Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University Malaya, Lembah Pantai, Kuala Lumpur, 59100, Malaysia.
Department of Social Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
BMC Gastroenterol. 2023 May 25;23(1):185. doi: 10.1186/s12876-023-02817-0.
Inflammatory bowel disease is an uncommon disease in developing nations whereby patient's knowledge on the disease may be limited. The CCKNOW questionnaire, a widely known questionnaire to assess patient's knowledge on the disease, may be too complex to comprehend for patients in developing countries. The aim of this study is to develop a new tool known as AIBDKQ questionnaire to evaluate the local inflammatory bowel disease patient's knowledge.
This was a prospective study carried out in four phases. In phase 1, three gastroenterologists with expertise in IBD generated a total of 21 questions related to the general knowledge of the disease in the English language. Phase 2 involved content and face validity whereby the questions were further validated by other gastroenterologists. In phase 3, the validated questions were translated into three languages namely Malay, Mandarin and Tamil which are commonly used in Malaysia. In phase 4 (statistical validity), administration of the questionnaires to patients and hospital staff were conducted to assess the construct validity, discriminative ability, predictive validity and reliability of the questionnaires.
A total of 21 questions were generated initially. Further evaluation indicated that 20 items had adequate kappa and content validity index for relevance (CVI: 0.714 to 1, Kapp: 0.645 to 1) and clarity (CVI: 0.714 to 1, Kapp: 0.645 to 1). The questionnaires in four languages were administered to 213 patients to assess the construct validity. Six items were removed (three for low communality, one for small loading factors, two for cross loading), resulting in 16 final questions. Assessment with 34 hospital staff involving nurses, doctors and clerks showed significant differences in knowledge between the groups (F = 14.007, p < 0.001) and were able to discriminate doctors from nurses and clerks. Another group of 18 hospital staff administered with AIBDKQ and CCKNOW questionnaires showed a Pearson's correlation coefficient of 0.8 indicating strong correlation and concurrent predictive validity between the two questionnaires. Final assessment with 38 patients for reliability assessment revealed high intraclass correlation of the questionnaire among the four languages.
The AIBDKQ has an excellent discriminant ability and internal consistency with a strong correlation when compared to the standard CCKNOW questionnaire.
炎症性肠病在发展中国家较为少见,患者对疾病的了解可能有限。CCKNOW 问卷是一种广泛用于评估患者对疾病了解程度的问卷,但对于发展中国家的患者来说,可能过于复杂而难以理解。本研究旨在开发一种新的工具,称为 AIBDKQ 问卷,以评估当地炎症性肠病患者的知识。
这是一项前瞻性研究,分四个阶段进行。在第 1 阶段,三位具有炎症性肠病专业知识的胃肠病学家共提出了 21 个与疾病基本知识相关的问题,这些问题以英文呈现。在第 2 阶段,内容和表面有效性,进一步验证了这些问题的有效性,由其他胃肠病学家进行验证。在第 3 阶段,将经过验证的问题翻译成三种在马来西亚常用的语言,即马来语、普通话和泰米尔语。在第 4 阶段(统计有效性),向患者和医院工作人员发放问卷,以评估问卷的结构有效性、判别能力、预测有效性和可靠性。
最初共提出了 21 个问题。进一步评估表明,20 项与相关性(CVI:0.714 至 1,Kapp:0.645 至 1)和清晰度(CVI:0.714 至 1,Kapp:0.645 至 1)相关的项目具有足够的 Kappa 和内容有效性指数。四种语言的问卷共发放给 213 名患者,以评估结构有效性。由于低共性、小负荷因素、两个交叉负荷等原因,有 6 个项目被删除,最终确定了 16 个问题。涉及护士、医生和职员的 34 名医院工作人员的评估显示,不同组别之间的知识存在显著差异(F=14.007,p<0.001),并能够区分医生、护士和职员。另一组 18 名医院工作人员接受了 AIBDKQ 和 CCKNOW 问卷的评估,显示出两个问卷之间的 Pearson 相关系数为 0.8,表明两者之间具有很强的相关性和预测有效性。对 38 名患者进行可靠性评估的最终评估显示,四种语言之间的问卷具有很高的内部一致性。
与标准 CCKNOW 问卷相比,AIBDKQ 具有良好的判别能力和内部一致性,与标准 CCKNOW 问卷具有很强的相关性。