Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.
Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Eur Stroke J. 2023 Jun;8(2):434-447. doi: 10.1177/23969873231151262. Epub 2023 Jan 18.
Acute ischaemic stroke due to distal medium vessel occlusion (AIS-DMVO) causes significant morbidity. Endovascular thrombectomy advancement has made treating AIS-DMVO with stent retrievers (SR) and aspiration catheters (AC) possible, however the optimal technique remains unknown. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the efficacy and safety of SR use compared to purely AC use in patients with AIS-DMVO.
We systematically searched PubMed, Cochrane Library and EMBASE, from inception to 2nd September 2022, for studies comparing SR or primary combined (SR/PC) against AC in AIS-DMVO. We adopted the Distal Thrombectomy Summit Group's definition of DMVO. Efficacy outcomes were functional independence (modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 0-2 at 90 days), first pass effect (modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction scale (mTICI) 2c-3 or expanded Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction scale (eTICI) 2c-3 at first pass), successful final recanalisation (mTICI or eTICI 2b-3), and excellent final recanalisation (mTICI or eTICI 2c-3). Safety outcomes were symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage (sICH) and 90-day mortality.
12 cohort studies and 1 randomised-controlled trial were included, involving 1881 patients with 1274 receiving SR/PC and 607 receiving AC only. SR/PC achieved higher odds of functional independence (odds ratio (OR) 1.33, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.06-1.67) and lower odds of mortality (OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.50-0.94) than AC. Odds of successful/excellent recanalisation and sICH were similar between both groups. Stratified to compare only SR and only AC, the use of only SR, achieved significantly higher odds of successful recanalisation as compared to only AC (OR 1.80, 95% CI 1.17-2.78).
There is potential for efficacy and safety benefits in SR/PC use as compared to AC only in AIS-DMVO. Further trials are necessary to validate the efficacy and safety of SR use in AIS-DMVO.
由于远端中等血管闭塞(AIS-DMVO)导致的急性缺血性脑卒中会引起显著的发病率。血管内血栓切除术的进步使得使用支架取栓器(SR)和抽吸导管(AC)治疗 AIS-DMVO 成为可能,然而最佳技术仍不清楚。我们进行了一项系统评价和荟萃分析,以调查与单纯使用 AC 相比,SR 在 AIS-DMVO 患者中的疗效和安全性。
我们系统地检索了 PubMed、Cochrane 图书馆和 EMBASE,从成立到 2022 年 9 月 2 日,以比较 SR 或单纯 AC 在 AIS-DMVO 中的应用。我们采用远端血栓切除术峰会组织的 DMVO 定义。疗效终点为功能独立性(90 天时改良 Rankin 量表(mRS)0-2)、初次通过效果(改良脑梗死溶栓分级(mTICI)2c-3 或扩展脑梗死溶栓分级(eTICI)2c-3)、最终成功再通(mTICI 或 eTICI 2b-3)和最终优秀再通(mTICI 或 eTICI 2c-3)。安全性终点为症状性颅内出血(sICH)和 90 天死亡率。
共纳入 12 项队列研究和 1 项随机对照试验,共涉及 1881 名患者,其中 1274 名患者接受了 SR/PC 治疗,607 名患者仅接受了 AC 治疗。与 AC 相比,SR/PC 治疗具有更高的功能独立性(优势比(OR)1.33,95%置信区间(CI)1.06-1.67)和更低的死亡率(OR 0.69,95%CI 0.50-0.94)。两组间成功/优秀再通和 sICH 的发生率相似。分层比较仅 SR 和仅 AC 时,与仅 AC 相比,仅使用 SR 可显著提高再通成功率(OR 1.80,95%CI 1.17-2.78)。
与单纯使用 AC 相比,SR/PC 治疗在 AIS-DMVO 中具有潜在的疗效和安全性优势。需要进一步的试验来验证 SR 在 AIS-DMVO 中的疗效和安全性。