Department of Neurosurgery, Emory University School of Medicine Atlanta, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Neurosurgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.
J Neurointerv Surg. 2023 Sep;15(e1):e93-e101. doi: 10.1136/jnis-2022-019023. Epub 2022 Aug 2.
Endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) is the standard-of-care for proximal large vessel occlusion (LVO) stroke. Data on technical and clinical outcomes in distal vessel occlusions (DVOs) remain limited.
This was a retrospective study of patients undergoing EVT for stroke at 32 international centers. Patients were divided into LVOs (internal carotid artery/M1/vertebrobasilar), medium vessel occlusions (M2/A1/P1) and isolated DVOs (M3/M4/A2/A3/P2/P3) and categorized by thrombectomy technique. Primary outcome was a good functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale ≤2) at 90 days. Secondary outcomes included recanalization, procedure-time, thrombectomy attempts, hemorrhage, and mortality. Multivariate logistic regressions were used to evaluate the impact of technical variables. Propensity score matching was used to compare outcome in patients with DVO treated with aspiration versus stent retriever RESULTS: We included 7477 patients including 213 DVOs. Distal location did not independently predict good functional outcome at 90 days compared with proximal (p=0.467). In distal occlusions, successful recanalization was an independent predictor of good outcome (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 5.11, p<0.05) irrespective of technique. Younger age, bridging therapy, and lower admission National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) were also predictors of good outcome. Procedure time ≤1 hour or ≤3 thrombectomy attempts were independent predictors of good outcomes in DVOs irrespective of technique (aOR 4.5 and 2.3, respectively, p<0.05). There were no differences in outcomes in a DVO matched cohort of aspiration versus stent retriever. Rates of hemorrhage and good outcome showed an exponential relationship to procedural metrics, and were more dependent on time in the aspiration group and attempts in the stent retriever group.
Outcomes following EVT for DVO are comparable to LVO with similar results between techniques. Techniques may exhibit different futility metrics; stent retriever thrombectomy was influenced by attempts whereas aspiration was more dependent on procedure time.
血管内血栓切除术(EVT)是治疗近端大血管闭塞(LVO)卒中的标准治疗方法。关于远端血管闭塞(DVO)的技术和临床结果的数据仍然有限。
这是一项在 32 个国际中心进行的接受 EVT 治疗卒中的患者的回顾性研究。患者分为 LVO(颈内动脉/M1/椎基底动脉)、中等血管闭塞(M2/A1/P1)和孤立的 DVO(M3/M4/A2/A3/P2/P3),并根据血栓切除术技术进行分类。主要结局是 90 天时的良好功能结局(改良 Rankin 量表≤2)。次要结局包括再通、手术时间、血栓切除术尝试、出血和死亡率。多变量逻辑回归用于评估技术变量的影响。倾向评分匹配用于比较接受抽吸与支架取栓治疗的 DVO 患者的结局。
我们纳入了 7477 例患者,其中 213 例为 DVO。与近端相比,DVO 部位并不独立预测 90 天时的良好功能结局(p=0.467)。在远端闭塞中,成功再通是良好结局的独立预测因素(调整后的优势比(aOR)5.11,p<0.05),与技术无关。年轻、桥接治疗和较低的入院国立卫生研究院卒中量表(NIHSS)评分也是良好结局的预测因素。无论技术如何,手术时间≤1 小时或≤3 次血栓切除术尝试都是 DVO 良好结局的独立预测因素(aOR 分别为 4.5 和 2.3,p<0.05)。在抽吸与支架取栓的 DVO 匹配队列中,结局没有差异。出血和良好结局的发生率与程序指标呈指数关系,并且在抽吸组中更依赖于时间,在支架取栓组中更依赖于尝试次数。
EVT 治疗 DVO 的结局与 LVO 相当,两种技术的结果相似。技术可能表现出不同的无效性指标;支架取栓血栓切除术受尝试次数影响,而抽吸术更依赖于手术时间。