物质使用症状清单对帮助临床医生在初级保健中评估物质使用障碍的心理测量性能。

Psychometric Performance of a Substance Use Symptom Checklist to Help Clinicians Assess Substance Use Disorder in Primary Care.

机构信息

Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle.

Department of Health Systems and Population Health, University of Washington School of Public Health, Seattle.

出版信息

JAMA Netw Open. 2023 May 1;6(5):e2316283. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.16283.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Substance use disorders (SUDs) are underrecognized in primary care, where structured clinical interviews are often infeasible. A brief, standardized substance use symptom checklist could help clinicians assess SUD.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the psychometric properties of the Substance Use Symptom Checklist (hereafter symptom checklist) used in primary care among patients reporting daily cannabis use and/or other drug use as part of population-based screening and assessment.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cross-sectional study was conducted among adult primary care patients who completed the symptom checklist during routine care between March 1, 2015, and March 1, 2020, at an integrated health care system. Data analysis was conducted from June 1, 2021, to May 1, 2022.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The symptom checklist included 11 items corresponding to SUD criteria in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual for Mental Disorders (Fifth Edition) (DSM-5). Item response theory (IRT) analyses tested whether the symptom checklist was unidimensional and reflected a continuum of SUD severity and evaluated item characteristics (discrimination and severity). Differential item functioning analyses examined whether the symptom checklist performed similarly across age, sex, race, and ethnicity. Analyses were stratified by cannabis and/or other drug use.

RESULTS

A total of 23 304 screens were included (mean [SD] age, 38.2 [5.6] years; 12 554 [53.9%] male patients; 17 439 [78.8%] White patients; 20 393 [87.5%] non-Hispanic patients). Overall, 16 140 patients reported daily cannabis use only, 4791 patients reported other drug use only, and 2373 patients reported both daily cannabis and other drug use. Among patients with daily cannabis use only, other drug use only, or both daily cannabis and other drug use, 4242 (26.3%), 1446 (30.2%), and 1229 (51.8%), respectively, endorsed 2 or more items on the symptom checklist, consistent with DSM-5 SUD. For all cannabis and drug subsamples, IRT models supported the unidimensionality of the symptom checklist, and all items discriminated between higher and lower levels of SUD severity. Differential item functioning was observed for some items across sociodemographic subgroups but did not result in meaningful change (<1 point difference) in the overall score (0-11).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this cross-sectional study, a symptom checklist, administered to primary care patients who reported daily cannabis and/or other drug use during routine screening, discriminated SUD severity as expected and performed well across subgroups. Findings support the clinical utility of the symptom checklist for standardized and more complete SUD symptom assessment to help clinicians make diagnostic and treatment decisions in primary care.

摘要

重要性

物质使用障碍(SUD)在初级保健中未得到充分认识,而结构化的临床访谈通常是不可行的。一份简短的、标准化的物质使用症状清单可以帮助临床医生评估 SUD。

目的

评估物质使用症状清单(以下简称症状清单)在报告日常使用大麻和/或其他药物的患者中的心理测量特性,这些患者是作为基于人群的筛查和评估的一部分。

设计、地点和参与者:这是一项横断面研究,在 2015 年 3 月 1 日至 2020 年 3 月 1 日期间,在综合医疗保健系统中,接受常规护理的成年初级保健患者在常规护理期间完成症状清单。数据分析于 2021 年 6 月 1 日至 2022 年 5 月 1 日进行。

主要结果和措施

症状清单包括 11 项与精神障碍诊断与统计手册(第五版)(DSM-5)中的 SUD 标准相对应的项目。项目反应理论(IRT)分析测试了症状清单是否具有单一维度,反映了 SUD 严重程度的连续体,并评估了项目特征(区分度和严重程度)。不同项目功能分析检查了症状清单在年龄、性别、种族和民族方面的表现是否相似。分析按大麻和/或其他药物的使用情况进行分层。

结果

共纳入 23304 次筛查(平均[标准差]年龄为 38.2[5.6]岁;12554 名[53.9%]男性患者;17439 名[78.8%]白人患者;20393 名[87.5%]非西班牙裔患者)。总体而言,16140 名患者报告每日使用大麻,4791 名患者报告仅使用其他药物,2373 名患者报告同时使用每日大麻和其他药物。在仅使用大麻的患者、仅使用其他药物的患者或同时使用大麻和其他药物的患者中,分别有 4242 名(26.3%)、1446 名(30.2%)和 1229 名(51.8%)在症状清单上勾选了 2 项或更多项目,符合 DSM-5 SUD 的标准。对于所有大麻和药物亚样本,IRT 模型支持症状清单的单一维度,所有项目都能区分 SUD 严重程度的高低。在一些社会人口统计学亚组中观察到了不同项目的功能差异,但在总分(0-11)方面没有导致有意义的变化(差异小于 1 分)。

结论和相关性

在这项横断面研究中,对在常规筛查中报告日常使用大麻和/或其他药物的初级保健患者进行了症状清单评估,结果表明,该清单可区分 SUD 严重程度,并在各个亚组中表现良好。研究结果支持该症状清单在标准化和更全面的 SUD 症状评估方面的临床实用性,以帮助临床医生在初级保健中做出诊断和治疗决策。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dea8/10220521/8ed2dff42c07/jamanetwopen-e2316283-g001.jpg

相似文献

引用本文的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索