Suppr超能文献

DSM-5 物质使用障碍标准在法国门诊成瘾诊所参与者中的项目反应理论分析。渴求有多特别?

Item Response Theory analyses of DSM-5 substance use disorder criteria in French outpatient addiction clinic participants. How much is craving special?

机构信息

University of Bordeaux, Phenomenology and Determinants of Appetitive Behaviors (Addiction Team), Sleep, Addiction and Neuropsychiatry Laboratory (SANPSY), USR CNRS 3413, 146 Bis Rue Léo Saignat, 33076, Bordeaux, France; Pôle Addictologie, CH Ch. Perrens and CHU de Bordeaux, 121 Rue De La Béchade, 33076, Bordeaux, France.

New York State Psychiatric Institute, 1051 Riverside Drive, New York, NY 10032, USA; Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 1051 Riverside Drive, New York, NY 10032, USA.

出版信息

Drug Alcohol Depend. 2020 Jul 1;212:108036. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2020.108036. Epub 2020 May 12.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the dimensionality and psychometric validity of the 11 DSM-5 criteria for 5 substance use disorders, with a focus on craving, and taking into account age, gender and psychiatric comorbidities in a French sample of subjects seeking addiction treatment.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study, included participants with DSM-5 substance use disorders that sought treatment for at least one addiction from outpatient clinics. Diagnostic criteria were evaluated with the Mini international Neuropsychiatric Interview. In Current regular user (2 times per week), factor and 2-parameter IRT analysis was used to investigate the dimensionality and psychometric properties of the 11 DSM-5 SUD criteria. Differential Item and Test functioning (DIF and DTF) analysis were performed across sociodemographic characteristics and psychiatric disorders.

RESULTS

1359 participants (alcohol n = 787, opiates n = 131, cocaine n = 141, tobacco n = 1014, cannabis n = 504), were included (68% male; mean age 38.7). One-factor dimensionality was confirmed, except for tobacco. Craving criterion had the strongest factor loadings, lower difficulty (range, -1.29 to -0.67) and higher discrimination (range, 2.11-3.05), and no DIF compared to other criteria. The tobacco criteria set functioned differently by mood and anxiety disorders.

CONCLUSIONS

We confirmed the unidimensionality of the 11 SUD DSM-5 criteria and furthermore that craving was the most selective criterion because of its psychometric properties and no DIF compared to other criteria, regardless of the substance in this adult clinical sample. Unidimensionality of tobacco criteria was not confirmed, suggesting DSM-IV abuse criteria limitations as indicators of the construct.

摘要

背景

评估 11 项 DSM-5 物质使用障碍标准的维度和心理测量效度,重点关注渴求,并考虑到年龄、性别和精神共病,在一个寻求成瘾治疗的法国受试者样本中。

方法

本横断面研究包括患有 DSM-5 物质使用障碍的参与者,他们至少因一种成瘾症在门诊诊所接受治疗。使用 Mini 国际神经精神访谈评估诊断标准。在当前的常规使用者(每周 2 次)中,使用因子和 2-参数 IRT 分析来研究 11 项 DSM-5 SUD 标准的维度和心理测量特性。进行了跨社会人口统计学特征和精神障碍的差异项目和测试功能(DIF 和 DTF)分析。

结果

共纳入 1359 名参与者(酒精 n = 787,阿片类 n = 131,可卡因 n = 141,烟草 n = 1014,大麻 n = 504)(68%为男性;平均年龄 38.7 岁)。除了烟草外,还证实了单因素维度。渴求标准的因子负荷最强,难度较低(范围为-1.29 至-0.67),鉴别力较高(范围为 2.11 至 3.05),与其他标准相比没有 DIF。烟草标准集的功能因心境和焦虑障碍而异。

结论

我们证实了 11 项 SUD DSM-5 标准的单维度性,并且由于其心理测量特性和与其他标准相比没有 DIF,渴求标准是最具选择性的标准,这在这个成年临床样本中。烟草标准的单维度性未得到证实,这表明 DSM-IV 滥用标准作为该结构的指标存在局限性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验