Judson Timothy J, Subash Meera, Harrison James D, Yeager Jan, Williams Aimée M, Grouse Carrie K, Byron Maria
Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.
Houston School of Biomedical Informatics, UTHealth, Houston, TX, United States.
JMIR Aging. 2023 May 26;6:e45641. doi: 10.2196/45641.
Electronic visits (e-visits) are billable, asynchronous patient-initiated messages that require at least five minutes of medical decision-making by a provider. Unequal use of patient portal tools like e-visits by certain patient populations may worsen health disparities. To date, no study has attempted to qualitatively assess perceptions of e-visits in older adults.
In this qualitative study, we aimed to understand patient perceptions of e-visits, including their perceived utility, barriers to use, and care implications, with a focus on vulnerable patient groups.
We conducted a qualitative study using in-depth structured individual interviews with patients from diverse backgrounds to assess their knowledge and perceptions surrounding e-visits as compared with unbilled portal messages and other visit types. We used content analysis to analyze interview data.
We conducted 20 interviews, all in adults older than 65 years. We identified 4 overarching coding categories or themes. First, participants were generally accepting of the concept of e-visits and willing to try them. Second, nearly two-thirds of the participants voiced a preference for synchronous communication. Third, participants had specific concerns about the name "e-visit" and when to choose this type of visit in the patient portal. Fourth, some participants indicated discomfort using or accessing technology for e-visits. Financial barriers to the use of e-visits was not a common theme.
Our findings suggest that older adults are generally accepting of the concept of e-visits, but uptake may be limited due to their preference for synchronous communication. We identified several opportunities to improve e-visit implementation.
电子问诊(e-visits)是可计费的、由患者发起的异步消息,需要医生至少进行五分钟的医疗决策。某些患者群体对电子问诊等患者门户工具的使用不平等可能会加剧健康差距。迄今为止,尚无研究试图对老年人对电子问诊的看法进行定性评估。
在这项定性研究中,我们旨在了解患者对电子问诊的看法,包括他们感知到的效用、使用障碍和护理影响,重点关注弱势患者群体。
我们进行了一项定性研究,对来自不同背景的患者进行深入的结构化个人访谈,以评估他们对电子问诊的了解和看法,并与未计费的门户消息及其他问诊类型进行比较。我们使用内容分析法来分析访谈数据。
我们进行了20次访谈,所有访谈对象均为65岁以上的成年人。我们确定了4个总体编码类别或主题。首先,参与者普遍接受电子问诊的概念并愿意尝试。其次,近三分之二的参与者表示更喜欢同步沟通。第三,参与者对“电子问诊”这个名称以及在患者门户中何时选择这种问诊类型有具体担忧。第四,一些参与者表示在使用或访问电子问诊技术时感到不适。使用电子问诊的经济障碍并非常见主题。
我们的研究结果表明,老年人普遍接受电子问诊的概念,但由于他们对同步沟通的偏好,采用率可能会受到限制。我们确定了几个改进电子问诊实施的机会。