Department of Cardiology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
J Med Internet Res. 2023 May 26;25:e44642. doi: 10.2196/44642.
Silent paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) may be difficult to diagnose, and AF burden is hard to establish. In contrast to conventional diagnostic devices, photoplethysmography (PPG)-driven smartwatches or wristbands allow for long-term continuous heart rhythm assessment. However, most smartwatches lack an integrated PPG-AF algorithm. Adding a standalone PPG-AF algorithm to these wrist devices might open new possibilities for AF screening and burden assessment.
The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy of a well-known standalone PPG-AF detection algorithm added to a popular wristband and smartwatch, with regard to discriminating AF and sinus rhythm, in a group of patients with AF before and after cardioversion (CV).
Consecutive consenting patients with AF admitted for CV in a large academic hospital in Amsterdam, the Netherlands, were asked to wear a Biostrap wristband or Fitbit Ionic smartwatch with Fibricheck algorithm add-on surrounding the procedure. A set of 1-min PPG measurements and 12-lead reference electrocardiograms was obtained before and after CV. Rhythm assessment by the PPG device-software combination was compared with the 12-lead electrocardiogram.
A total of 78 patients were included in the Biostrap-Fibricheck cohort (156 measurement sets) and 73 patients in the Fitbit-Fibricheck cohort (143 measurement sets). Of the measurement sets, 19/156 (12%) and 7/143 (5%), respectively, were not classifiable by the PPG algorithm due to bad quality. The diagnostic performance in terms of sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy was 98%, 96%, 96%, 99%, 97%, and 97%, 100%, 100%, 97%, and 99%, respectively, at an AF prevalence of ~50%.
This study demonstrates that the addition of a well-known standalone PPG-AF detection algorithm to a popular PPG smartwatch and wristband without integrated algorithm yields a high accuracy for the detection of AF, with an acceptable unclassifiable rate, in a semicontrolled environment.
无症状阵发性心房颤动(房颤)可能难以诊断,且房颤负荷难以确定。与传统诊断设备相比,光电容积脉搏波(PPG)驱动的智能手表或腕带可实现长期连续的心律评估。然而,大多数智能手表缺乏集成的 PPG-AF 算法。在这些腕带设备上添加独立的 PPG-AF 算法可能为房颤筛查和负荷评估开辟新的可能性。
本研究旨在评估一种知名的独立 PPG-AF 检测算法在添加到流行的腕带和智能手表后的准确性,该算法用于区分房颤和窦性心律,适用于接受电复律(CV)前后的房颤患者。
荷兰阿姆斯特丹一家大型学术医院的连续同意接受 CV 的房颤患者被要求在手术期间佩戴 Biostrap 腕带或 Fitbit Ionic 智能手表,并使用 Fibricheck 算法附加装置。在 CV 前后获得一组 1 分钟的 PPG 测量值和 12 导联参考心电图。PPG 设备软件组合的节律评估与 12 导联心电图进行比较。
Biostrap-Fibricheck 队列共纳入 78 例患者(156 个测量组),Fitbit-Fibricheck 队列纳入 73 例患者(143 个测量组)。在 156 个测量组中,有 19 个(12%),在 143 个测量组中,有 7 个(5%),因质量差而无法通过 PPG 算法进行分类。在房颤患病率约为 50%的情况下,该算法的诊断性能为敏感性 98%、特异性 96%、阳性预测值 96%、阴性预测值 99%和准确性 97%;100%、100%、100%、97%和 99%。
本研究表明,在无集成算法的流行 PPG 智能手表和腕带中添加知名的独立 PPG-AF 检测算法,可以在半受控环境中实现房颤的高准确性检测,且可接受的无法分类率。