Song Guihua, Zhang Yan, Yu Suping, Sun Mengmeng, Zhang Bingxue, Peng Minghao, Lv Weigang, Zhou Hongyun
Department of Pediatric, The First Affiliated Hospital of Henan University of TCM, 19 Renmin Road, Jinshui District, 450000, Zhengzhou, China.
Pediatr Res. 2023 Nov;94(5):1600-1608. doi: 10.1038/s41390-023-02591-5. Epub 2023 May 26.
This study summarized the available randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to assess the efficacy and safety of macrolides on pathogens, lung function, laboratory parameters, and safety in children with bronchiectasis.
PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library were searched for available papers published up to June 2021. The outcomes were the pathogens, adverse events (AEs), and the forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1%) predicted.
Seven RCTs (633 participants) were included. The long-term use of macrolides reduced the risk of the presence of Moraxella catarrhalis (RR = 0.67, 95% CI: 0.30-1.50, P = 0.001; I = 0.0%, P = 0.433), but not Haemophilus influenza (RR = 0.19, 95% CI: 0.08-0.49, P = 0.333; I = 57.0%, P = 0.040), Streptococcus pneumonia (RR = 0.91, 95% CI: 0.61-1.35, P = 0.635; I = 0.0%, P = 0.515), Staphylococcus aureus (RR = 1.01, 95% CI: 0.36-2.84, P = 0.986; I = 61.9%, P = 0.033), and any pathogens present (RR = 0.61, 95% CI: 0.29-1.29, P = 0.195; I = 80.3%, P = 0.006). Long-term macrolides had no effect on FEV1% predicted (WMD = 2.61, 95% CI: -1.31, 6.53, P = 0.192; I = 0.0%, P = 0.896). Long-term macrolides did not increase the risk of AEs or serious AEs.
Macrolides do not significantly reduce the risk of pathogens present (except for Moraxella catarrhalis) or increase FEV1% predicted among children with bronchiectasis. Moreover, macrolides were not associated with AEs. Considering the limitations of the meta-analysis, further larger-scale RCTs are needed to confirm the findings.
Macrolides do not significantly reduce the risk of pathogens present (except for Moraxella catarrhalis) among children with bronchiectasis. Macrolides do not significantly increase FEV1% predicted among children with bronchiectasis. This meta-analysis reports on the efficacy and safety of macrolides in the treatment of children with bronchiectasis, providing evidence for the management of children with bronchiectasis. This meta-analysis does not support the use of macrolides in the management of children with bronchiectasis unless the presence of Moraxella catarrhalis is provenor suspected.
本研究总结了现有的随机对照试验(RCT),以评估大环内酯类药物对支气管扩张症患儿的病原体、肺功能、实验室指标及安全性的疗效和安全性。
检索PubMed、EMBASE和Cochrane图书馆中截至2021年6月发表的可用论文。观察指标为病原体、不良事件(AE)和预测的一秒用力呼气量(FEV1%)。
纳入7项RCT(633名参与者)。长期使用大环内酯类药物可降低卡他莫拉菌感染风险(RR = 0.67,95%CI:0.30 - 1.50,P = 0.001;I² = 0.0%,P = 0.433),但不能降低流感嗜血杆菌感染风险(RR = 0.19,95%CI:0.08 - 0.49,P = 0.333;I² = 57.0%,P = 0.040)、肺炎链球菌感染风险(RR = 0.91,95%CI:0.61 - 1.35,P = 0.635;I² = 0.0%,P = 0.515)、金黄色葡萄球菌感染风险(RR = 1.01,95%CI:0.36 - 2.84,P = 0.986;I² = 61.9%,P = 0.033)及任何病原体感染风险(RR = 0.61,95%CI:0.29 - 1.29,P = 0.195;I² = 80.3%,P = 0.006)。长期使用大环内酯类药物对预测的FEV1%无影响(WMD = 2.61,95%CI: - 1.31,6.53,P = 0.192;I² = 0.0%,P = 0.896)。长期使用大环内酯类药物不会增加AE或严重AE的风险。
大环内酯类药物不会显著降低支气管扩张症患儿的病原体感染风险(卡他莫拉菌除外),也不会增加预测的FEV1%。此外,大环内酯类药物与AE无关。考虑到荟萃分析的局限性,需要进一步开展更大规模的RCT来证实这些发现。
大环内酯类药物不会显著降低支气管扩张症患儿的病原体感染风险(卡他莫拉菌除外)。大环内酯类药物不会显著增加支气管扩张症患儿预测的FEV1%。本荟萃分析报告了大环内酯类药物治疗支气管扩张症患儿的疗效和安全性,为支气管扩张症患儿的管理提供了证据。本荟萃分析不支持在支气管扩张症患儿的管理中使用大环内酯类药物,除非已证实或怀疑存在卡他莫拉菌感染。