School of Nursing and Health Professions, University of San Francisco, 2130 Fulton St, San Francisco, CA, 94117, USA.
Fielding School of Public Health, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
BMC Public Health. 2023 May 26;23(1):971. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15916-0.
Nonpharmaceutical interventions, including face mask-wearing, physical distancing, and avoidance of crowds and poorly ventilated spaces, have been widely recommended to limit the spread of SARS-CoV-2. To date, there is little data available on engagement in nonpharmaceutical interventions and COVID-19 in college students. Using a large sample of college students, we estimate the prevalence of engagement in mask-wearing, physical distancing, and avoidance of crowds/poorly ventilated spaces and their associations with COVID-19.
A cross-sectional study was conducted (February-March 2021) using a college-wide online survey among students (n = 2,132) in California. Multiple modified poisson regression models assessed associations between mask-wearing indoors, physical distancing (both indoors or public settings/outdoors), avoidance of crowds/poorly ventilated spaces and COVID-19, controlling for potential confounders.
Fourteen percent (14.4%) reported a previous COVID-19 illness. Most students reported wearing masks consistently indoors (58%), and 78% avoided crowds/poorly ventilated spaces. About half (50%) reported consistent physical distancing in public settings/outdoor and 45% indoors. Wearing a mask indoors was associated with 26% lower risk of COVID-19 disease (RR = 0.74; 95% CI: 0.60,0.92). Physical distancing indoors and in public settings/outdoors was associated with a 30% (RR = 0.70; 95% CI: 0.56,0.88) and 28% (RR = 0.72; 95% CI: 0.58,0.90) decrease risk of COVID-19, respectively. No association was observed with avoidance of crowds/poorly ventilated spaces. The risk of COVID-19 declined as the number of preventive behaviors a student engaged in increased. Compared to those who did not engage in any preventive behaviors (consistently), students who consistently engaged in one behavior had a 25% lower risk (RR = 0.75; 95% CI: 0.53,1.06), those who engaged in two behaviors had 26% lower risk (RR = 0.74; 95% CI: 0.53,1.03), those who engaged in three behaviors had 51% lower risk (RR = 0.49; 95% CI: 0.33,0.74), and those who consistently engaged in all four behaviors had 45% lower risk of COVID-19 (RR = 0.55; 95% CI: 0.40,0.78).
Wearing face masks and physical distancing were both associated with a lower risk of COVID-19. Students who engaged in more nonpharmaceutical interventions were less likely to report COVID-19. Our findings support guidelines promoting mask-wearing and physical distancing to limit the spread of COVID-19 on campuses and the surrounding communities.
非药物干预措施,包括戴口罩、保持身体距离、避免人群和通风不良的空间,已被广泛推荐用于限制 SARS-CoV-2 的传播。迄今为止,关于大学生戴口罩、保持身体距离和避免人群/通风不良空间的情况及其与 COVID-19 的关系,数据很少。本研究使用加利福尼亚州大学生的大样本,估计戴口罩、保持身体距离和避免人群/通风不良空间的比例及其与 COVID-19 的关系。
这是一项横断面研究(2021 年 2 月至 3 月),使用加利福尼亚州大学生的大学范围内在线调查。采用多项修正泊松回归模型,在控制潜在混杂因素后,评估了室内戴口罩、(室内或公共场所/户外)保持身体距离、避免人群/通风不良空间与 COVID-19 之间的关联。
14%(14.4%)报告曾患有 COVID-19。大多数学生报告经常在室内戴口罩(58%),78%避免人群/通风不良空间。约一半(50%)报告在公共场所/户外经常保持身体距离,45%在室内。在室内戴口罩与 COVID-19 风险降低 26%相关(RR=0.74;95%CI:0.60,0.92)。室内和公共场所/户外保持身体距离与 COVID-19 风险分别降低 30%(RR=0.70;95%CI:0.56,0.88)和 28%(RR=0.72;95%CI:0.58,0.90)相关。避免人群/通风不良空间与 COVID-19 无关联。学生参与的预防行为数量越多,COVID-19 的风险越低。与不采取任何预防措施的学生相比(始终不采取),始终采取一种预防措施的学生 COVID-19 风险降低 25%(RR=0.75;95%CI:0.53,1.06),采取两种预防措施的学生 COVID-19 风险降低 26%(RR=0.74;95%CI:0.53,1.03),采取三种预防措施的学生 COVID-19 风险降低 51%(RR=0.49;95%CI:0.33,0.74),始终采取四种预防措施的学生 COVID-19 风险降低 45%(RR=0.55;95%CI:0.40,0.78)。
戴口罩和保持身体距离均与 COVID-19 风险降低相关。参与非药物干预措施越多的学生,报告 COVID-19 的可能性越低。我们的研究结果支持了推广戴口罩和保持身体距离以限制 COVID-19 在校园和周边社区传播的指南。