Vecchio Daniela, Piras Fabrizio, Ciullo Valentina, Piras Federica, Natalizi Federica, Ducci Giuseppe, Ambrogi Sonia, Spalletta Gianfranco, Banaj Nerisa
Laboratory of Neuropsychiatry, Department of Clinical and Behavioral Neurology, IRCCS Santa Lucia Foundation, 00179 Rome, Italy.
Department of Psychology, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Via dei Marsi 78, 00185 Rome, Italy.
J Pers Med. 2023 May 6;13(5):799. doi: 10.3390/jpm13050799.
Patients with deficit schizophrenia (SZD) suffer from primary and enduring negative symptoms. Limited pieces of evidence and neuroimaging studies indicate they differ from patients with non-deficit schizophrenia (SZND) in neurobiological aspects, but the results are far from conclusive. We applied for the first time, graph theory analyses to discriminate local and global indices of brain network topology in SZD and SZND patients compared with healthy controls (HC). High-resolution T1-weighted images were acquired for 21 SZD patients, 21 SZND patients, and 21 HC to measure cortical thickness from 68 brain regions. Graph-based metrics (i.e., centrality, segregation, and integration) were computed and compared among groups, at both global and regional networks. When compared to HC, at the regional level, SZND were characterized by temporoparietal segregation and integration differences, while SZD showed widespread alterations in all network measures. SZD also showed less segregated network topology at the global level in comparison to HC. SZD and SZND differed in terms of centrality and integration measures in nodes belonging to the left temporoparietal cortex and to the limbic system. SZD is characterized by topological features in the network architecture of brain regions involved in negative symptomatology. Such results help to better define the neurobiology of SZD (SZD: Deficit Schizophrenia; SZND: Non-Deficit Schizophrenia; SZ: Schizophrenia; HC: healthy controls; CC: clustering coefficient; L: characteristic path length; E: efficiency; D: degree; CC: CC of a node; CC: the global CC of the network; E: efficiency of the information transfer flow either within segregated subgraphs or neighborhoods nodes; E: efficiency of the information transfer flow among the global network; FDA: Functional Data Analysis; and D: estimated minimum densities).
缺陷型精神分裂症(SZD)患者存在原发性且持久的阴性症状。有限的证据和神经影像学研究表明,他们在神经生物学方面与非缺陷型精神分裂症(SZND)患者不同,但结果远未定论。我们首次应用图论分析来区分SZD和SZND患者与健康对照(HC)相比脑网络拓扑的局部和全局指标。对21例SZD患者、21例SZND患者和21例HC采集高分辨率T1加权图像,以测量68个脑区的皮质厚度。计算基于图的指标(即中心性、分离度和整合度)并在组间、全局和区域网络层面进行比较。与HC相比,在区域层面,SZND的特征是颞顶叶分离和整合差异,而SZD在所有网络测量中均表现出广泛改变。与HC相比,SZD在全局层面也表现出分离度较低的网络拓扑。SZD和SZND在属于左侧颞顶叶皮质和边缘系统的节点的中心性和整合度测量方面存在差异。SZD的特征是参与阴性症状学的脑区网络架构中的拓扑特征。这些结果有助于更好地定义SZD的神经生物学(SZD:缺陷型精神分裂症;SZND:非缺陷型精神分裂症;SZ:精神分裂症;HC:健康对照;CC:聚类系数;L:特征路径长度;E:效率;D:度;CC:节点的CC;CC:网络的全局CC;E:隔离子图或邻域节点内信息传递流的效率;E:全局网络间信息传递流的效率;FDA:功能数据分析;D:估计的最小密度)。