Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School, Worcester, MA (Dr Essa).
Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School, Worcester, MA (Dr Kovell).
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2023 Aug;5(8):101034. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2023.101034. Epub 2023 May 25.
Cardiac disease is a leading cause of maternal morbidity and mortality in the United States, and an increasing number of patients with known cardiac disease are reaching childbearing age. Although guidelines indicate that cesarean deliveries should be reserved for obstetrical indications, rates of cesarean delivery among obstetrical patients with cardiovascular disease are higher than those of the general population.
This study aimed to evaluate mode of delivery and perinatal outcomes among patients with low-risk and moderate to high-risk cardiac disease as defined by the modified World Health Organization classification of maternal cardiovascular risk.
We performed a retrospective cohort study of obstetrical patients with known cardiac disease, as defined by the modified World Health Organization cardiovascular classification categories in pregnancy, who underwent a perinatal transthoracic echocardiogram at a single academic medical center between October 1, 2017 and May 1, 2022. Demographics, clinical characteristics, and perinatal outcomes were collected. Comparisons were made between patients with low- (modified World Health Organization Class I) and moderate to high-risk (modified World Health Organization Class II-IV) cardiac disease using chi-square, Fisher exact, or Student t-tests. Cohen d tests were used to estimate the effect size between group means. Logistic regression models were used to evaluate the odds of vaginal and cesarean delivery in low- and moderate to high-risk groups.
A total of 108 participants were eligible for inclusion, with 41 participants in the low-risk cardiac group and 67 in the moderate to high-risk group. Participants had a mean age of 32.1 (±5.5) years at the time of delivery and a mean pregravid body mass index of 29.9 (±7.8) kg/m. Chronic hypertension (13.9%) and a history of hypertensive disorder of pregnancy (14.9%) were the most common comorbid medical conditions. In total, 17.1% of the sample had a history of a cardiac event (eg, arrhythmia, heart failure, myocardial infarction). Rates of vaginal and cesarean deliveries were similar between the low- and moderate to high-risk cardiac groups. Patients in the moderate to high-risk cardiac group were more likely to be admitted to the intensive care unit during pregnancy (odds ratio, 7.8; P<.05) and experience severe maternal morbidity compared with patients in the low-risk cardiac group (P<.01). Mode of delivery was not associated with severe maternal morbidity in the higher-risk cardiac group (odds ratio, 3.2; P=.12). In addition, infants of mothers with higher-risk disease were more likely to be admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit (odds ratio, 3.6; P=.06) and have longer neonatal intensive care unit stays (P=.005).
There was no difference in mode of delivery by modified World Health Organization cardiac classification, and mode of delivery was not associated with risk of severe maternal morbidity. Despite the overall increased risk of morbidity in the higher-risk group, vaginal delivery should be considered as an option for certain patients with well-compensated cardiac disease. However, larger studies are needed to confirm these findings.
在美国,心脏疾病是产妇发病率和死亡率的主要原因,越来越多的已知患有心脏疾病的患者达到生育年龄。尽管指南表明剖宫产应保留给产科指征,但心血管疾病产科患者的剖宫产率高于普通人群。
本研究旨在评估根据改良世界卫生组织(WHO)产妇心血管风险分类定义的低危和中高危心脏疾病患者的分娩方式和围产儿结局。
我们对在单家学术医疗中心于 2017 年 10 月 1 日至 2022 年 5 月 1 日期间接受过围产期经胸超声心动图的已知心脏疾病的产科患者进行了回顾性队列研究,这些患者根据改良的 WHO 心血管分类类别进行了分类。收集了人口统计学、临床特征和围产儿结局数据。使用卡方检验、Fisher 确切检验或学生 t 检验比较低危(改良的 WHO Ⅰ级)和中高危(改良的 WHO Ⅱ-Ⅳ级)心脏疾病患者之间的差异。Cohen d 检验用于估计组间均值之间的效应大小。使用逻辑回归模型评估低危和中高危组阴道分娩和剖宫产的可能性。
共有 108 名参与者符合纳入标准,其中 41 名参与者在低危心脏组,67 名在中高危心脏组。参与者的分娩时平均年龄为 32.1(±5.5)岁,平均孕前体重指数为 29.9(±7.8)kg/m。最常见的合并症是慢性高血压(13.9%)和妊娠高血压疾病史(14.9%)。共有 17.1%的样本有心脏事件(如心律失常、心力衰竭、心肌梗死)史。低危和中高危心脏组的阴道分娩和剖宫产率相似。中高危心脏组患者在妊娠期间更有可能被收入重症监护病房(比值比,7.8;P<.05),并且与低危心脏组患者相比,发生严重产妇发病率的可能性更高(P<.01)。高危心脏组中,分娩方式与严重产妇发病率无关(比值比,3.2;P=.12)。此外,高危疾病母亲的婴儿更有可能被收入新生儿重症监护病房(比值比,3.6;P=.06),并且新生儿重症监护病房的住院时间更长(P<.005)。
根据改良的 WHO 心脏分类,分娩方式没有差异,分娩方式与严重产妇发病率无关。尽管高危组整体发病率较高,但对于某些病情代偿良好的心脏疾病患者,应考虑阴道分娩。然而,需要更大规模的研究来证实这些发现。