Impact of Nasal Cavity CT Opacification Upon Sinonasal Quality of Life.

BACKGROUND

Current methods of quantifying inflammation in chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) on computed tomography (CT) imaging focus on opacification of the paranasal sinuses and show limited correlation with patient-reported outcome measures.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to determine if quantifying CT opacification of the nasal cavity correlated with Sino-Nasal Outcomes Test scores (SNOT-22).

METHODS

Thirty patients with CRS were enrolled. Lund-Mackay and SNOT-22 scores were measured. Nasal cavity regions of interest (ROIs) were measured by 2 independent raters using ImageJ at 3 points on coronal CT scans: anteriorly at the lacrimal duct, at the approximate midpoint demarcated by the posterior aspect of the globe, and posteriorly at the transition from the hard to soft palate. Superior and inferior regions were defined based upon the root of the inferior turbinate. Percent opacification was calculated for each ROI. Analyses were conducted bilaterally and for the side with greater opacification (worse side).

RESULTS

Interrater reliability was strong for all ROIs. Lund-Mackay scores correlated with nasal blockage only ( = .495,  = .01) and did not correlate with nasal cavity ROI opacification. Inferior nasal cavity opacification for worse-sided anterior ROI and middle ROI correlated with SNOT-22 scores for nasal blockage (anterior  = .41,  = .03) (middle  = .42,  = .023) and runny nose (anterior  = .44,  = .02) (middle  = .38,  = .04). Posterior ROIs did not correlate with SNOT-22.

CONCLUSIONS

Traditional CT scoring of sinus opacification does not correlate well with nasal cavity opacification or SNOT-22. Inferior nasal cavity inflammation provides unique correlations with SNOT-22 nasal questions and may guide targeted interventions in these regions.