Suppr超能文献

度洛西汀与安慰剂相比用于术后急性疼痛管理:随机临床试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。

Postoperative acute pain management with duloxetine as compared to placebo: A systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesiology, Shri Guru Ram Rai Institute of Medical & Health Sciences, Dehradun, India.

Department of Neurosurgery, Shri Guru Ram Rai Institute of Medical & Health Sciences, Dehradun, India.

出版信息

Pain Pract. 2023 Sep;23(7):818-837. doi: 10.1111/papr.13253. Epub 2023 May 28.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Duloxetine has been used as an adjunct in multimodal analgesia for acute postoperative pain in clinical studies. This meta-analysis aims to conclude whether oral duloxetine, when given perioperatively, is any better than a placebo in managing postoperative pain. Effects of duloxetine on postoperative pain scores, time to first rescue analgesia, postoperative rescue analgesia consumption, side effects attributable to duloxetine, and patient satisfaction profile were assessed.

METHOD

MEDLINE, Web of Science, EMBASE, Scholar Google, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) were searched with keywords including "Duloxetine" AND "postoperative pain", "Duloxetine" AND "acute pain" and with "Duloxetine" till October 2022. This meta-analysis included randomized clinical trials in which perioperative duloxetine 60 mg per oral was administered not more than 7 days before surgery and for at least 24 after surgery but not more than 14 days after surgery. All RCTs in which the comparator is placebo and outcomes related to analgesic efficacy like pain scores, opioid consumption, and side effects of duloxetine until 48 h postoperatively were included. Data were extracted from the studies and a risk of bias summary was formed using the Cochrane Collaboration tool. Effect sizes were given as standardized mean differences for continuous outcomes and risk ratios (RR) by the Mantel-Haenszel test for the categorical outcome. Confirmation of publication bias was done by Egger's regression test (p < 0.05). If publication bias or heterogeneity was detected, the trim-and-fill method was used to calculate the adjusted effect size. Sensitivity analysis was done by leaving one out method after excluding the study with a high risk of bias. Subgroup analysis was done based on the type of surgery and gender. The study was prospectively registered in the PROSPERO under the registration number CRD42019139559.

FINDINGS

29 studies with 2043 patients met the inclusion criteria and were reviewed for this meta-analysis. Postoperative pain scores at 24 h [Std. Mean Difference (95% CI); -0.69 (-1.07, -0.32)] and at 48 h [-1.13 (-1.68, -0.58)] are significantly less with duloxetine (p-value < 0.05). Time to first rescue analgesia was significantly more in patients where duloxetine was administered [1.27 (1.10, 1.45); p-value > 0.05]. Opioid consumption up to 24 h [-1.82 (-2.46, -1.18)] and 48 h [-2.48 (-3.46, -1.50)] was significantly less (p-value < 0.05) in patients who received duloxetine. Complications and recovery profiles were similar in patients receiving either duloxetine or a placebo.

INTERPRETATION

Based on GRADE findings, we conclude that there is low to moderate evidence to advocate the use of duloxetine for managing postoperative pain. Further trials are needed to replicate or refute these results based on robust methodology.

摘要

背景

度洛西汀已在临床研究中被用作多模式镇痛辅助药物,用于治疗急性术后疼痛。本荟萃分析旨在得出结论,即在围手术期给予口服度洛西汀是否比安慰剂更能有效控制术后疼痛。评估度洛西汀对术后疼痛评分、首次解救性镇痛时间、术后解救性镇痛消耗、与度洛西汀相关的副作用以及患者满意度的影响。

方法

使用关键词“度洛西汀”和“术后疼痛”、“度洛西汀”和“急性疼痛”以及“度洛西汀”对 MEDLINE、Web of Science、EMBASE、Scholar Google 和 Cochrane 对照试验中心注册库(CENTRAL)进行检索,检索截至 2022 年 10 月。本荟萃分析纳入了随机临床试验,其中度洛西汀 60mg 口服,在术前 7 天内给予,并在术后至少 24 小时内给予,但不超过术后 14 天。所有 RCT 中,安慰剂作为对照组,与镇痛疗效相关的结局,如疼痛评分、阿片类药物消耗和度洛西汀的副作用,直至术后 48 小时。从研究中提取数据,并使用 Cochrane 协作工具形成风险偏倚摘要。连续结局的效应大小以标准化均数差表示,分类结局的效应大小以 Mantel-Haenszel 检验的风险比(RR)表示。通过 Egger 回归检验(p<0.05)确认发表偏倚。如果检测到发表偏倚或异质性,则使用修剪和填充方法计算调整后的效应大小。通过剔除高偏倚风险的研究,进行敏感性分析。基于手术类型和性别进行亚组分析。该研究已在 PROSPERO 中进行了前瞻性注册,注册号为 CRD42019139559。

发现

符合纳入标准的 29 项研究共纳入 2043 例患者,进行了荟萃分析。术后 24 小时 [标准均数差(95%置信区间);-0.69(-1.07,-0.32)]和术后 48 小时 [-1.13(-1.68,-0.58)]的疼痛评分显著较低(p 值<0.05)。首次解救性镇痛时间显著延长,给予度洛西汀的患者 [1.27(1.10,1.45);p 值>0.05]。术后 24 小时 [-1.82(-2.46,-1.18)]和 48 小时 [-2.48(-3.46,-1.50)]的阿片类药物消耗明显减少(p 值<0.05)。接受度洛西汀或安慰剂的患者的并发症和恢复情况相似。

解释

基于 GRADE 证据,我们得出结论,有低到中等质量的证据支持使用度洛西汀治疗术后疼痛。需要进一步的试验来基于稳健的方法复制或反驳这些结果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验