• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在癌症门诊护理中实施用药核对。

Implementation of medication reconciliation in outpatient cancer care.

机构信息

Cancer Quality Lab, Princess Margaret Hospital Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Hospital Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

BMJ Open Qual. 2023 May;12(2). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2022-002211.

DOI:10.1136/bmjoq-2022-002211
PMID:37247944
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10230967/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Medication reconciliation (MedRec) is a process where providers work with patients to document and communicate comprehensive medication information by creating a complete medication list (best possible medication history (BPMH)) then reconciling it against what patient is actually taking to identify potential issues such as drug-drug interactions. We undertook an environmental scan of current MedRec practices in outpatient cancer care to inform a quality improvement project at our centre with the aim of 30% of patients having a BPMH or MedRec within 30 days of initiating treatment with systemic therapy.

METHODS

We conducted semi-structured interviews with key stakeholders from 21 cancer centres across Canada, probing on current policies, and barriers and facilitators to MedRec. Guided by the findings of the scan, we then undertook a quality improvement project at our cancer centre, comprising six iterative improvement cycles.

RESULTS

Most institutions interviewed had a process in place for collecting a BPMH (81%) and targeted patients initiating systemic therapy (59%); however, considerable practice variation was noted and completion of full MedRec was uncommon. Lack of resources, high patient volumes, lack of a common medical record spanning institutions and settings which limits access to medication records from external institutions and community pharmacies were identified as significant barriers. Despite navigating challenges related to the COVID-19 pandemic, we achieved 26.6% of eligible patients with a documented BPMH. However, uptake of full MedRec remained low whereby 4.7% of patients had a documented MedRec.

CONCLUSIONS

Realising improvements to completion of MedRec in outpatient cancer care is possible but takes considerable time and iteration as the process is complex. Resource allocation and information sharing remain major barriers which need to be addressed in order to observe meaningful improvements in MedRec.

摘要

背景

药物重整(MedRec)是一个过程,医疗保健提供者通过创建完整的药物清单(最佳可能的药物史(BPMH)),与患者一起记录和交流全面的药物信息,然后与患者实际服用的药物进行核对,以确定潜在的问题,如药物相互作用。我们对门诊癌症护理中的当前 MedRec 实践进行了环境扫描,以为我们中心的一个质量改进项目提供信息,目标是在开始接受系统治疗后 30 天内,有 30%的患者有 BPMH 或 MedRec。

方法

我们对来自加拿大 21 个癌症中心的关键利益相关者进行了半结构化访谈,探讨了当前的政策、药物重整的障碍和促进因素。根据扫描结果,我们在我们的癌症中心开展了一个质量改进项目,包括六个迭代改进周期。

结果

大多数接受采访的机构都有收集 BPMH 的流程(81%),并针对开始接受系统治疗的患者(59%);然而,注意到实践存在很大差异,完整的 MedRec 完成率不高。缺乏资源、患者数量高、机构和环境之间缺乏通用的医疗记录,限制了从外部机构和社区药店获取药物记录的机会,这些都是重大障碍。尽管在 COVID-19 大流行期间遇到了挑战,我们仍实现了 26.6%符合条件的患者有记录的 BPMH。然而,完整的 MedRec 采用率仍然很低,只有 4.7%的患者有记录的 MedRec。

结论

在门诊癌症护理中实现药物重整完成情况的改善是可能的,但需要相当长的时间和迭代,因为这个过程很复杂。资源分配和信息共享仍然是需要解决的主要障碍,以便在药物重整方面取得有意义的改进。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f808/10230967/1e879b8a55ad/bmjoq-2022-002211f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f808/10230967/666edcaade31/bmjoq-2022-002211f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f808/10230967/1e879b8a55ad/bmjoq-2022-002211f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f808/10230967/666edcaade31/bmjoq-2022-002211f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f808/10230967/1e879b8a55ad/bmjoq-2022-002211f02.jpg

相似文献

1
Implementation of medication reconciliation in outpatient cancer care.在癌症门诊护理中实施用药核对。
BMJ Open Qual. 2023 May;12(2). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2022-002211.
2
Implementing medication reconciliation in outpatient pediatrics.在儿科门诊实施用药重整。
Pediatrics. 2011 Dec;128(6):e1600-7. doi: 10.1542/peds.2011-0993. Epub 2011 Nov 28.
3
Electronic Decision Support for Deprescribing in Patients on Hemodialysis: Clinical Research Protocol for a Prospective, Controlled, Quality Improvement Study.血液透析患者减药的电子决策支持:一项前瞻性、对照性质量改进研究的临床研究方案
Can J Kidney Health Dis. 2023 Jun 26;10:20543581231165712. doi: 10.1177/20543581231165712. eCollection 2023.
4
A Mixed-Method Study of Practitioners' Perspectives on Issues Related to EHR Medication Reconciliation at a Health System.一项关于医疗系统中从业者对电子健康记录药物重整相关问题看法的混合方法研究。
Qual Manag Health Care. 2019 Apr/Jun;28(2):84-95. doi: 10.1097/QMH.0000000000000208.
5
Process mapping evaluation of medication reconciliation in academic teaching hospitals: a critical step in quality improvement.学术教学医院用药重整的流程映射评估:质量改进的关键步骤。
BMJ Open. 2016 Dec 30;6(12):e013663. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013663.
6
Impact of PharmaNet-Based Admission Medication Reconciliation on Best Possible Medication Histories for Warfarin.基于药物网络的入院用药核对对华法林最佳用药史的影响。
Can J Hosp Pharm. 2016 Sep-Oct;69(5):348-355. doi: 10.4212/cjhp.v69i5.1589. Epub 2016 Oct 31.
7
Medication reconciliation process: Assessing value, adoption, and the potential of information technology from pharmacists' perspective.用药重整流程:从药师角度评估其价值、采用情况和信息技术的潜力。
Health Informatics J. 2021 Jan-Mar;27(1):1460458220987276. doi: 10.1177/1460458220987276.
8
Implementing a sustainable medication reconciliation process in Australian hospitals: The World Health Organization High 5s project.在澳大利亚医院实施可持续的用药核对流程:世界卫生组织“高5”项目
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2020 Mar;16(3):290-298. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2019.05.011. Epub 2019 May 23.
9
Assessing the knowledge, perception and practices of physicians and pharmacists towards medication reconciliation in Kuwait governmental hospitals: a cross-sectional study.评估科威特政府医院医生和药剂师在药物重整方面的知识、认知和实践:一项横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Jun 16;9(6):e027395. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027395.
10
A Health System's Pilot Experience with Using Social Knowledge Networking (SKN) Technology to Enable Meaningful Use of EHR Medication Reconciliation Technology.一个卫生系统运用社会知识网络(SKN)技术以实现电子健康记录用药核对技术的有意义使用的试点经验。
J Hosp Manag Health Policy. 2019 Sep;3. doi: 10.21037/jhmhp.2019.08.01. Epub 2019 Sep 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Effectiveness of digital platform in reducing unintentional medication discrepancies at transition of care from hospital discharge to primary healthcare settings: a randomised controlled trial.数字平台在减少从医院出院到基层医疗环境过渡期间无意用药差异方面的有效性:一项随机对照试验。
BMC Prim Care. 2025 Jul 2;26(1):206. doi: 10.1186/s12875-025-02904-z.
2
Factors associated with perceived medication safety during transitions of care in patients with cancer: A secondary data analysis of a cross-sectional survey.癌症患者护理转接期间与感知药物安全性相关的因素:一项横断面调查的二次数据分析
Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2025 Jun;76:102857. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2025.102857. Epub 2025 Mar 4.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Impact of Medication Reconciliation by a Dialysis Pharmacist.透析药师进行药物重整的影响。
Kidney360. 2022 Mar 25;3(5):922-925. doi: 10.34067/KID.0007182021. eCollection 2022 May 26.
2
Implementation of a Medication Reconciliation Risk Stratification Tool Integrated within an electronic health record: A Case Series of Three Academic Medical Centers.在电子健康记录中集成用药核对风险分层工具的实施:三个学术医疗中心的病例系列
Healthc (Amst). 2022 Dec;10(4):100654. doi: 10.1016/j.hjdsi.2022.100654. Epub 2022 Sep 18.
3
Impact of integrated medication management program on medication errors in a medical center: an interrupted time series study.
Discussion on the optimization of personalized medication using information systems based on pharmacogenomics: an example using colorectal cancer.
基于药物基因组学的信息系统在个性化用药优化中的探讨:以结直肠癌为例
Front Pharmacol. 2025 Jan 14;15:1516469. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1516469. eCollection 2024.
4
The Community Pharmacy as a Study Center for the Epidemiological Analysis of the Population Vaccination against SARS-CoV-2: Evaluation of Vaccine Safety and Pharmaceutical Service.社区药房作为针对SARS-CoV-2人群疫苗接种进行流行病学分析的研究中心:疫苗安全性评估与药学服务
Pharmacy (Basel). 2024 Jan 20;12(1):16. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy12010016.
5
How Safe are Outpatient Electronic Health Records? An Evaluation of Medication-Related Decision Support using the Ambulatory Electronic Health Record Evaluation Tool.门诊电子健康记录有多安全?使用门诊电子健康记录评估工具对药物相关决策支持进行的评估。
Appl Clin Inform. 2023 Oct;14(5):981-991. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1777107. Epub 2023 Dec 13.
综合药物管理方案对医疗中心药物错误的影响:一项中断时间序列研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Jun 20;22(1):796. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08178-w.
4
Virtual clinical pharmacy services: A model of care to improve medication safety in rural and remote Australian health services.虚拟临床药学服务:改善澳大利亚农村和偏远地区医疗服务药物安全的护理模式。
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2022 Aug 5;79(16):1376-1384. doi: 10.1093/ajhp/zxac082.
5
Patterns and predictors of cancer-specific patient health portal usage among patients with cancer: results from the UWCCC Survivorship Program.癌症患者使用癌症特定患者健康门户的模式和预测因素:来自 UWCCC 生存项目的结果。
Cancer Med. 2021 Oct;10(20):7373-7382. doi: 10.1002/cam4.4234. Epub 2021 Aug 28.
6
Prevalence of Medication Errors and the Associated Factors: A Prospective Observational Study Among Cancer Patients at Mbarara Regional Referral Hospital.用药错误的发生率及其相关因素:姆巴拉拉地区转诊医院癌症患者的前瞻性观察研究
Cancer Manag Res. 2021 May 10;13:3739-3748. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S307001. eCollection 2021.
7
Effects of a refined evidence-based toolkit and mentored implementation on medication reconciliation at 18 hospitals: results of the MARQUIS2 study.精细化循证工具包和指导实施对 18 家医院药物重整的影响:MARQUIS2 研究结果。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2022 Apr;31(4):278-286. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2020-012709. Epub 2021 Apr 29.
8
Digital Applications Targeting Medication Safety in Ambulatory High-Risk CKD Patients: Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.针对门诊高危 CKD 患者用药安全的数字应用:随机对照临床试验。
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2021 Apr 7;16(4):532-542. doi: 10.2215/CJN.15020920. Epub 2021 Mar 18.
9
A cross-sectional study: medication safety among cancer in-patients in tertiary care hospitals in KPK, Pakistan.横断面研究:巴基斯坦开伯尔-普赫图赫瓦省三级护理医院癌症住院患者的用药安全。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Aug 19;19(1):583. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4420-7.
10
Implementing a sustainable medication reconciliation process in Australian hospitals: The World Health Organization High 5s project.在澳大利亚医院实施可持续的用药核对流程:世界卫生组织“高5”项目
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2020 Mar;16(3):290-298. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2019.05.011. Epub 2019 May 23.