Exercise Science and Neuroscience Unit, Department of Exercise & Health, Faculty of Science, Paderborn University, Germany.
Education & Research Department, Isokinetic Medical Group, FIFA Medical Centre of Excellence, Bologna, Italy.
J Athl Train. 2024 Mar 1;59(3):262-269. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-0209.22.
Evidence is emerging that core neurocognitive functions such as working memory and inhibitory control (ie, motor-response and attentional inhibition) are linked to the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury risk. Research has been conducted in laboratory settings, but the contribution of neurocognition to actual ACL injuries under real-world conditions is unknown.
To describe the possible neurocognitive errors involved in noncontact ACL injury mechanisms.
Case series.
Soccer matches.
A total of 47 professional male soccer players.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Three independent reviewers evaluated 47 videos of players sustaining noncontact ACL injuries. Neurocognitive errors in inhibitory control were operationalized as follows: (1) motor-response inhibition was scored when a player demonstrated poor decision-making and approached the opponent with high speed that reduced the ability to stop or change the intended action and (2) an attentional error was scored when a player shifted his selective attention away from the relevant task to irrelevant stimuli.
Of 47 noncontact ACL injuries, 26 (55%) were related to a pressing-type injury, 19 (73%) of which involved a deceiving action made by the opponent, suggesting poor inhibitory control of the defender. Of the remaining 21 noncontact ACL injuries (45%), 16 (76%) could be attributed to attentional errors. Agreement among the 3 raters was very good for all items except poor decision-making, which showed fair to good agreement (Fleiss κ = 0.71). Interrater reliability was excellent (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.99-1.00).
Errors in motor-response inhibitory control and attentional inhibition were common during noncontact ACL injury events in professional male soccer players. The interrater agreement in detecting neurocognitive errors in general was very good.
有证据表明,核心神经认知功能(如工作记忆和抑制控制[即运动反应和注意力抑制])与前交叉韧带(ACL)损伤风险相关。研究已经在实验室环境中进行,但在实际情况下神经认知对实际 ACL 损伤的贡献尚不清楚。
描述非接触性 ACL 损伤机制中可能涉及的神经认知错误。
病例系列。
足球比赛。
共有 47 名职业男性足球运动员。
三名独立评审员评估了 47 名遭受非接触性 ACL 损伤的球员的视频。抑制控制中的神经认知错误如下操作化:(1)当球员表现出较差的决策能力并以高速接近对手从而降低停止或改变预期动作的能力时,会记录到运动反应抑制;(2)当球员将选择性注意力从相关任务转移到不相关的刺激时,会记录到注意力错误。
在 47 例非接触性 ACL 损伤中,26 例(55%)与加压型损伤有关,其中 19 例(73%)涉及对手的欺骗动作,表明防守者的抑制控制能力较差。在其余 21 例非接触性 ACL 损伤(45%)中,16 例(76%)可归因于注意力错误。除了较差的决策能力外,3 名评审员对所有项目的一致性均非常好,较差的决策能力显示出中等至良好的一致性(Fleiss κ = 0.71)。评分者间的可靠性非常好(组内相关系数= 0.99-1.00)。
在职业男性足球运动员的非接触性 ACL 损伤事件中,运动反应抑制和注意力抑制的错误很常见。总体而言,检测神经认知错误的评分者间一致性非常好。