• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

软组织损伤后外侧踝关节扭伤青少年跑者的跑步步态适应性。

Running gait adaptations among adolescent runners with soft tissue impairments following lateral ankle sprains.

机构信息

School of Kinesiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.

Micheli Center for Sports Injury Prevention, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA.

出版信息

PM R. 2023 Dec;15(12):1557-1564. doi: 10.1002/pmrj.13000. Epub 2023 Jun 27.

DOI:10.1002/pmrj.13000
PMID:37249347
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Lateral ankle sprains (LAS) frequently lead to residual soft tissue impairments, often attributed to biomechanical dysfunction during movement.

OBJECTIVE

To compare running biomechanics between adolescent runners with soft tissue pathologies following LAS (injured) and healthy runners (control) and between limbs.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Hospital-affiliated sports injury prevention center.

PARTICIPANTS

Twenty-five adolescent runners with a history of LAS and current ankle impingement or tendinopathy (23 female, 2 male; age: 15 ± 2 years; body mass index [BMI]: 19.5 ± 2.5 kg/m ; symptom duration: 1.1 ± 0.9 years), and 23 healthy controls without any LAS history (19 female, 4 male; age: 15 ± 1 years; BMI: 19.2 ± 2.7 kg/m ) were included in this study.

INTERVENTIONS

All participants completed a clinical gait assessment in which they ran at a self-selected speed on a force-plate instrumented treadmill, while two video cameras recorded two-dimensional sagittal and coronal views.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Foot rotation, step width, contact time, and cadence were compared between groups and limbs (involved, uninvolved [or "better" for bilateral cases]) using a multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA). Rearfoot landing and foot strike type were compared between groups and limbs using a chi-square analysis.

RESULTS

The injured group had significantly increased step width (F = 4.71, p = .04; mean difference [MD] with SE: 1.5 [0.7] cm) compared to controls. The injured groups' involved limb had longer contact time (F = 4.62, p = .03; MD : 12 [7] ms, MD : 22 [11] ms) with more internal foot rotation (F = 14.60, p < .001; MD : 2.2 [1.2] degrees, MD : 4.2 [1.3] degrees) compared to controls and their contralateral limb. There were no significant differences for cadence (F = 2.43, p = .13; MD: 4 [3] steps/min), foot landing (X  = 1.28, p = .53), or foot strike (X  = 1.24, p = .54).

CONCLUSIONS

Spatiotemporal and kinematic running adaptations may predispose young runners with initial LAS to secondary soft tissue dysfunction due to loss of stability from ligamentous structures and an overreliance on myotendinous control. Clinicians may consider targeting these maladaptations during gait-training interventions.

摘要

背景

外侧踝关节扭伤 (LAS) 常导致软组织损伤残留,通常归因于运动过程中的生物力学功能障碍。

目的

比较有 LAS 病史的青少年跑步者(受伤)和健康跑步者(对照组)以及肢体之间的跑步生物力学。

设计

回顾性队列研究。

地点

医院附属运动伤害预防中心。

参与者

25 名有 LAS 病史且当前踝关节撞击或肌腱病(23 名女性,2 名男性;年龄:15 ± 2 岁;体重指数 [BMI]:19.5 ± 2.5 kg/m ;症状持续时间:1.1 ± 0.9 年)的青少年跑步者,以及 23 名无任何 LAS 病史的健康对照组(19 名女性,4 名男性;年龄:15 ± 1 岁;BMI:19.2 ± 2.7 kg/m )被纳入本研究。

干预

所有参与者都完成了临床步态评估,他们在测力平板跑步机上以自选择的速度跑步,同时两个摄像机记录二维矢状面和冠状面视图。

主要观察指标

使用多变量方差分析 (MANOVA) 比较组间和肢体间(受伤、未受伤[或双侧病例中的“更好”])的足部旋转、步幅、接触时间和步频。使用卡方分析比较组间和肢体间的后足着地和足触地类型。

结果

与对照组相比,受伤组的步幅明显增加(F=4.71,p=0.04;均值差异[MD],SE:1.5 [0.7] cm)。受伤组的受累肢体接触时间更长(F=4.62,p=0.03;MD:12 [7] ms,MD:22 [11] ms),足部内旋更多(F=14.60,p<0.001;MD:2.2 [1.2] 度,MD:4.2 [1.3] 度)与对照组和对侧肢体相比。步频无显著差异(F=2.43,p=0.13;MD:4 [3] 步/min),足部着地(X 2=1.28,p=0.53)或足触地类型(X 2=1.24,p=0.54)。

结论

时空和运动学跑步适应可能使有初始 LAS 的年轻跑步者易患继发性软组织功能障碍,原因是韧带结构丧失稳定性和过度依赖肌腱控制。临床医生在进行步态训练干预时可能需要针对这些适应不良进行治疗。

相似文献

1
Running gait adaptations among adolescent runners with soft tissue impairments following lateral ankle sprains.软组织损伤后外侧踝关节扭伤青少年跑者的跑步步态适应性。
PM R. 2023 Dec;15(12):1557-1564. doi: 10.1002/pmrj.13000. Epub 2023 Jun 27.
2
Military Service Members with Major Lower Extremity Fractures Return to Running with a Passive-dynamic Ankle-foot Orthosis: Comparison with a Normative Population.下肢主要骨折的军人使用被动式踝足矫形器恢复跑步:与正常人群的比较。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2021 Nov 1;479(11):2375-2384. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001873.
3
Biomechanical running gait assessments across prevalent adolescent musculoskeletal injuries.常见青少年肌肉骨骼损伤的生物力学跑步步态评估。
Gait Posture. 2022 Jul;96:123-129. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2022.05.025. Epub 2022 May 23.
4
Redistribution of Mechanical Work at the Knee and Ankle Joints During Fast Running in Minimalist Shoes.极简主义跑鞋快速奔跑时膝关节和踝关节的机械功再分配
J Athl Train. 2016 Oct;51(10):806-812. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-51.12.05. Epub 2016 Nov 11.
5
Increased Contact Time and Strength Deficits in Runners With Exercise-Related Lower Leg Pain.跑步者出现与运动相关的小腿疼痛时,接触时间增加,力量下降。
J Athl Train. 2020 Dec 1;55(12):1247-1254. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-0514.19.
6
Adaptation of Running Biomechanics to Repeated Barefoot Running: A Randomized Controlled Study.适应重复赤脚跑步的跑步生物力学:一项随机对照研究。
Am J Sports Med. 2019 Jul;47(8):1975-1983. doi: 10.1177/0363546519849920. Epub 2019 Jun 5.
7
Is There a Pathological Gait Associated With Common Soft Tissue Running Injuries?常见软组织跑步损伤是否存在病理性步态?
Am J Sports Med. 2018 Oct;46(12):3023-3031. doi: 10.1177/0363546518793657. Epub 2018 Sep 7.
8
Metabolic, cardiopulmonary, and gait profiles of recently injured and noninjured runners.近期受伤和未受伤跑步者的代谢、心肺功能及步态概况。
PM R. 2015 Jan;7(1):26-33. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2014.06.013. Epub 2014 Jul 1.
9
Transition to forefoot strike reduces load rates more effectively than altered cadence.从后足过渡到前足着地能更有效地降低负荷率,而改变步频则不然。
J Sport Health Sci. 2020 May;9(3):248-257. doi: 10.1016/j.jshs.2019.07.006. Epub 2019 Jul 17.
10
Kinematics Analysis of Male Runners via Forefoot and Rearfoot Strike Strategies: A Preliminary Study.男性跑步者前脚掌和后脚掌着地策略的运动学分析:一项初步研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 29;19(23):15924. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192315924.