• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Educational Videos Versus Question Banks: Maximizing Medical Student Performance on the United States Medical Licensing Examination Step 1 Exam.教育视频与题库:最大化医学生在美国医师执照考试第一步考试中的表现
Cureus. 2023 Apr 25;15(4):e38110. doi: 10.7759/cureus.38110. eCollection 2023 Apr.
2
Development and Evaluation of a Student-Initiated Test Preparation Program for the USMLE Step 1 Examination.美国医师执照考试第一步(USMLE Step 1)学生自主备考计划的开发与评估
Teach Learn Med. 2018 Apr-Jun;30(2):193-201. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2017.1386106. Epub 2017 Dec 14.
3
Correlation of Medical College Admission Test Scores and Self-assessment Materials with the United States Medical Licensing Examination Step 1 Performance.医学院入学考试成绩及自我评估材料与美国医师执照考试第一步成绩的相关性
Cureus. 2020 Apr 2;12(4):e7519. doi: 10.7759/cureus.7519.
4
Correlation of the National Emergency Medicine M4 Clerkship Examination with USMLE Examination Performance.国家急诊医学M4临床实习考试与美国医师执照考试成绩的相关性。
West J Emerg Med. 2015 Dec;16(7):1159-65. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2015.10.25496. Epub 2015 Dec 14.
5
Exploring the Predictors of Post-Clerkship USMLE Step 1 Scores.探讨实习后 USMLE 步骤 1 成绩的预测因素。
Teach Learn Med. 2020 Jun-Jul;32(3):330-336. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2020.1721293. Epub 2020 Feb 19.
6
Predicting United States Medical Licensing Examination Step 2 Clinical Knowledge Scores from Previous Academic Performance Measures within a Longitudinal Interleaved Curriculum.从纵向交错课程中先前的学业成绩指标预测美国医师执照考试第二步临床知识分数。
Cureus. 2021 Sep 20;13(9):e18143. doi: 10.7759/cureus.18143. eCollection 2021 Sep.
7
Relationship between pathology curricular approaches and performance in the United States medical licensing examination (USMLE), step 1: a national cross-sectional study.美国医师执照考试(USMLE)第一步中病理学课程教学方法与考试成绩的关系:一项全国性横断面研究
Hum Pathol. 2003 May;34(5):417-22. doi: 10.1016/s0046-8177(03)00082-0.
8
Multivariable analysis of factors associated with USMLE scores across U.S. medical schools.多变量分析与美国医学院 USMLE 分数相关的因素。
BMC Med Educ. 2019 May 20;19(1):154. doi: 10.1186/s12909-019-1605-z.
9
Factors Predictive of Performance on USMLE Step 1: Do Commercial Study Aids Improve Scores?美国执业医师资格考试第一步(USMLE Step 1)成绩的预测因素:商业学习辅助工具能提高分数吗?
Med Sci Educ. 2019 May 7;29(3):667-672. doi: 10.1007/s40670-019-00722-4. eCollection 2019 Sep.
10
Are study strategies related to medical licensing exam performance?学习策略与医学执照考试成绩有关吗?
Int J Med Educ. 2014 Nov 2;5:199-204. doi: 10.5116/ijme.5439.6491.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring Students' Use of Medical Education Resources for the USMLE Step 2 CK Exam Preparation.探索学生使用医学教育资源备考美国医师执照考试第二步临床知识考试(USMLE Step 2 CK)的情况。
Med Sci Educ. 2025 Apr 3;35(3):1597-1603. doi: 10.1007/s40670-025-02362-3. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Learning together: a narrative review of external resources for medical education through a shared student-faculty lens.共同学习:从学生与教师共同视角对医学教育外部资源的叙述性综述
Ann Med. 2025 Dec;57(1):2483971. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2025.2483971. Epub 2025 Mar 28.
3
GPT-4 generated answer rationales to multiple choice assessment questions in undergraduate medical education.GPT-4为本科医学教育中多项选择题评估问题生成的答案原理。
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Mar 4;25(1):333. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-06862-z.
4
A Literature Review on Optimizing Study Strategies in Medical Education: Insights From Exam Scores and Study Resources.医学教育中优化学习策略的文献综述:来自考试成绩和学习资源的见解
Cureus. 2024 Nov 19;16(11):e74034. doi: 10.7759/cureus.74034. eCollection 2024 Nov.

本文引用的文献

1
Brave new E-world: Medical students' preferences for and usage of electronic learning resources during two different phases of their education.全新的电子世界:医学生在两个不同教育阶段对电子学习资源的偏好与使用情况
FASEB Bioadv. 2022 Jan 17;4(5):298-308. doi: 10.1096/fba.2021-00124. eCollection 2022 May.
2
Exploring students' [pre-pandemic] use and the impact of commercial-off-the-shelf learning platforms on students' national licensing exam performance: A focused review - BEME Guide No. 72.探索学生[疫情前]对现成商用学习平台的使用情况及其对学生国家执照考试成绩的影响:一项重点综述 - BEME指南第72号
Med Teach. 2022 Jul;44(7):707-719. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2022.2039380. Epub 2022 Mar 10.
3
Interactive retrieval practice in renal physiology improves performance on customized National Board of Medical Examiners examination of medical students.互动式检索实践在肾脏生理学中提高了医学生对定制国家医学考试委员会考试的表现。
Adv Physiol Educ. 2022 Mar 1;46(1):35-40. doi: 10.1152/advan.00118.2021. Epub 2021 Oct 28.
4
Exploring Preparation for the USMLE Step 2 Exams to Inform Best Practices.探索美国医师执照考试第二步(USMLE Step 2)的备考方法,以形成最佳实践方案。
PRiMER. 2021 Aug 31;5:26. doi: 10.22454/PRiMER.2021.693105. eCollection 2021.
5
Understanding Excellence: a Qualitative Analysis of High-Performing Learner Study Strategies.理解卓越:对高效学习者学习策略的定性分析
Med Sci Educ. 2021 Mar 25;31(3):1101-1108. doi: 10.1007/s40670-021-01279-x. eCollection 2021 Jun.
6
Factors Predictive of Performance on USMLE Step 1: Do Commercial Study Aids Improve Scores?美国执业医师资格考试第一步(USMLE Step 1)成绩的预测因素:商业学习辅助工具能提高分数吗?
Med Sci Educ. 2019 May 7;29(3):667-672. doi: 10.1007/s40670-019-00722-4. eCollection 2019 Sep.
7
University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences College of Medicine.阿肯色大学医学科学学院医学院。
Acad Med. 2020 Sep;95(9S A Snapshot of Medical Student Education in the United States and Canada: Reports From 145 Schools):S30-S32. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000003303.
8
Interventions for undergraduate and postgraduate medical learners with academic difficulties: A BEME systematic review: BEME Guide No. 56.干预措施对有学业困难的本科和研究生医学学习者:BEME 系统评价:BEME 指南第 56 号。
Med Teach. 2019 Sep;41(9):981-1001. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2019.1596239. Epub 2019 May 12.
9
The association of USMLE Step 1 and Step 2 CK scores with residency match specialty and location.美国医师执照考试第一步(USMLE Step 1)和第二步临床知识考试(Step 2 CK)成绩与住院医师匹配专业及地点的关联。
Med Educ Online. 2017;22(1):1358579. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2017.1358579.
10
Shifting the Curve: Fostering Academic Success in a Diverse Student Body.改变曲线:在多元化的学生群体中培养学术成功。
Acad Med. 2018 Jan;93(1):66-70. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001783.

教育视频与题库:最大化医学生在美国医师执照考试第一步考试中的表现

Educational Videos Versus Question Banks: Maximizing Medical Student Performance on the United States Medical Licensing Examination Step 1 Exam.

作者信息

Clemmons Karina R, Vuk Jasna, Jarrett Diane M

机构信息

Department of Medical Humanities and Bioethics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, USA.

Academic Affairs, Educational and Student Success Center, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, USA.

出版信息

Cureus. 2023 Apr 25;15(4):e38110. doi: 10.7759/cureus.38110. eCollection 2023 Apr.

DOI:10.7759/cureus.38110
PMID:37252516
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10211266/
Abstract

Objective The aim of this research was to determine if medical students' use of the active study strategy of working practice questions is associated with improved performance on the United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) Step 1 exam when compared to students who used the passive study strategy of watching educational videos. Methods The study used a correlational design. Participants were students from two cohorts in a United States medical school (N=164 and N=163) who completed their first two years and took the USMLE Step 1 exam. Data collected retrospectively included the number of practice questions completed, educational videos watched, Step 1 exam scores, average scores on in-class exams, and scores on the Medical College Admission Test (MCAT). Results The number of videos watched was negatively and significantly correlated with the Step 1 score for cohort 2022 (r= -0.294, α=0.01) and cohort 2023 (r= -0.175, α=0.05). The number of practice questions worked was positively and significantly correlated with the Step 1 score for cohort 2022 (r=0.176, α=0.05) and cohort 2023 (r=0.143 though not significant). The number of practice questions was a significant positive predictor of Step 1 score for cohort 2022 (β=0.141, p=0.017) and cohort 2023 (β=0.133, p=0.015). Videos were significant negative predictors for cohort 2023 (β= -0.118, p=0.034). Conclusions Answering practice questions appears to be a more effective study method than passively watching videos. Though other studies have supported the use of active learning methods, this study is unique in finding a negative correlation between test scores and the number of educational videos watched. Medical students should be urged to make the most effective use of study time by incorporating working practice questions and limiting watching educational videos.

摘要

目的 本研究的目的是确定与采用观看教育视频这种被动学习策略的学生相比,医学生使用做练习题这种主动学习策略是否与美国医师执照考试(USMLE)第一步考试成绩的提高相关。方法 本研究采用相关性设计。参与者是美国一所医学院两个队列的学生(N = 164和N = 163),他们完成了前两年的学业并参加了USMLE第一步考试。回顾性收集的数据包括完成的练习题数量、观看的教育视频数量、第一步考试成绩、课堂考试平均成绩以及医学院入学考试(MCAT)成绩。结果 2022队列(r = -0.294,α = 0.01)和2023队列(r = -0.175,α = 0.05)中,观看视频的数量与第一步考试成绩呈显著负相关。2022队列(r = 0.176,α = 0.05)和2023队列(r = 0.143,虽不显著)中,做练习题的数量与第一步考试成绩呈显著正相关。2022队列(β = 0.141,p = 0.017)和2023队列(β = 0.133,p = 0.015)中,练习题数量是第一步考试成绩的显著正预测因子。2023队列中,视频是显著的负预测因子(β = -0.118,p = 0.034)。结论 做练习题似乎是比被动观看视频更有效的学习方法。尽管其他研究支持使用主动学习方法,但本研究独特之处在于发现考试成绩与观看教育视频数量之间存在负相关。应敦促医学生通过做练习题并限制观看教育视频来最有效地利用学习时间。