• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在患有高甘油三酯血症的儿科患者中,比较桑普森法和扩展马丁/霍普金斯法计算低密度脂蛋白胆固醇与直接测量法的差异。

Comparison of Sampson and extended Martin/Hopkins methods of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol calculations with direct measurement in pediatric patients with hypertriglyceridemia.

作者信息

Touhidul Islam S M, Muthukumar Alagar R, Mary Jones Patricia, Hashim Ibrahim, Cao Jing

机构信息

University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, US.

Children's Health Dallas , TX, US.

出版信息

Lab Med. 2024 Mar 7;55(2):140-144. doi: 10.1093/labmed/lmad047.

DOI:10.1093/labmed/lmad047
PMID:37253142
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The Friedewald equation is the commonly used method of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) calculation, requiring reflex to direct LDL-C measurement when triglycerides (TG) ≥ 400 mg/dL. Recently formulated Sampson and extended Martin/Hopkins methods have been validated with TG up to 800 mg/dL and thus have the potential to replace direct LDL-C measurement. Given the growing prevalence of childhood dyslipidemia, the objective of this study was to compare Sampson and extended Martin/Hopkins methods of LDL-C calculation with the direct measurement in a pediatric cohort with 400 ≤ TG ≤ 799 mg/dL.

METHODS

This study retrieved standard lipid panels and corresponding direct LDL-C measurements of 131 patients with 400 ≤ TG ≤ 799 mg/dL from a pediatric population. Following the application of Sampson and extended Martin/Hopkins calculations, calculated values were compared with direct LDL-C measurements using ordinary least squares linear regression analysis and bias plotting.

RESULTS

Both Sampson and extended Martin/Hopkins LDL-C calculations exhibited a strong correlation with the direct measurements (Pearson r = 0.89) in patients with 400 ≤ TG ≤ 800 mg/dL. Average percentages of bias of 45% and 21% were found between the direct LDL-C measurements and Sampson or extended Martin/Hopkins calculations, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Both Sampson and extended Martin/Hopkins calculations are applicable as clinical alternatives of direct LDL-C measurement in pediatric patients given 400 ≤ TG ≤ 799 mg/dL.

摘要

目的

弗里德瓦尔德方程是计算低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)的常用方法,当甘油三酯(TG)≥400mg/dL时需要采用直接LDL-C测量法。最近制定的桑普森法以及扩展的马丁/霍普金斯法已在TG高达800mg/dL的情况下得到验证,因此有潜力取代直接LDL-C测量法。鉴于儿童血脂异常的患病率不断上升,本研究的目的是在TG为400≤TG≤799mg/dL的儿科队列中,比较桑普森法和扩展的马丁/霍普金斯法计算LDL-C与直接测量法的差异。

方法

本研究从儿科人群中检索了131例TG为400≤TG≤799mg/dL患者的标准血脂谱及相应的直接LDL-C测量值。应用桑普森法和扩展的马丁/霍普金斯法进行计算后,使用普通最小二乘法线性回归分析和偏差绘图将计算值与直接LDL-C测量值进行比较。

结果

在TG为400≤TG≤800mg/dL的患者中,桑普森法和扩展的马丁/霍普金斯法计算的LDL-C与直接测量值均显示出强相关性(皮尔逊r=0.89)。直接LDL-C测量值与桑普森法或扩展的马丁/霍普金斯法计算值之间的平均偏差百分比分别为45%和21%。

结论

对于TG为400≤TG≤799mg/dL的儿科患者,桑普森法和扩展的马丁/霍普金斯法计算均可作为直接LDL-C测量的临床替代方法。

相似文献

1
Comparison of Sampson and extended Martin/Hopkins methods of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol calculations with direct measurement in pediatric patients with hypertriglyceridemia.在患有高甘油三酯血症的儿科患者中,比较桑普森法和扩展马丁/霍普金斯法计算低密度脂蛋白胆固醇与直接测量法的差异。
Lab Med. 2024 Mar 7;55(2):140-144. doi: 10.1093/labmed/lmad047.
2
Comparison of Methods to Estimate Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol in Patients With High Triglyceride Levels.比较高甘油三酯血症患者估算低密度脂蛋白胆固醇的方法。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Oct 1;4(10):e2128817. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.28817.
3
Correlation of extended Martin/Hopkins equation with a direct homogeneous assay in assessing low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in patients with hypertriglyceridemia.扩展的 Martin/Hopkins 方程与直接均相法评估高甘油三酯血症患者的低密度脂蛋白胆固醇的相关性。
J Clin Lab Anal. 2023 Sep;37(17-18):e24963. doi: 10.1002/jcla.24963. Epub 2023 Sep 7.
4
Discordance Between Standard Equations for Determination of LDL Cholesterol in Patients With Atherosclerosis.动脉粥样硬化患者 LDL 胆固醇测定的标准方程之间的差异。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022 Feb 15;79(6):530-541. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2021.11.042.
5
Validation of Friedewald, Martin-Hopkins and Sampson low-density lipoprotein cholesterol equations.验证 Friedewald、Martin-Hopkins 和 Sampson 低密度脂蛋白胆固醇方程。
PLoS One. 2022 May 13;17(5):e0263860. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0263860. eCollection 2022.
6
Comparison of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol equations in patients with dyslipidaemia receiving cholesterol ester transfer protein inhibition.在接受胆固醇酯转移蛋白抑制治疗的血脂异常患者中比较低密度脂蛋白胆固醇方程。
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother. 2023 Feb 2;9(2):148-155. doi: 10.1093/ehjcvp/pvac056.
7
Calculated LDL-cholesterol: comparability of the extended Martin/Hopkins, Sampson/NIH, Friedewald and four other equations in South African patients.计算 LDL-胆固醇:南非患者中扩展的 Martin/Hopkins、Sampson/NIH、Friedewald 以及其他四个方程的可比性。
J Clin Pathol. 2024 Sep 19;77(10):656-662. doi: 10.1136/jcp-2023-208916.
8
Comparability of 11 different equations for estimating LDL cholesterol on different analysers.比较不同分析仪上 11 种不同 LDL 胆固醇估算方程的可比性。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2021 Aug 12;59(12):1930-1943. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2021-0747. Print 2021 Nov 25.
9
Validation of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol equations in pediatric population.验证低密度脂蛋白胆固醇方程在儿科人群中的适用性。
PeerJ. 2023 Jan 5;11:e14544. doi: 10.7717/peerj.14544. eCollection 2023.
10
Assessment of three equations to calculate plasma LDL cholesterol concentration in fasting and non-fasting hypertriglyceridemic patients.评估三种公式在空腹和非空腹高甘油三酯血症患者中计算血浆 LDL 胆固醇浓度的效果。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2023 Sep 8;62(2):270-279. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2023-0360. Print 2024 Jan 26.