Department of Laboratory Medicine and Healthcare Research Institute, Healthcare System Gangnam Center, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Department of Laboratory Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
J Clin Lab Anal. 2023 Sep;37(17-18):e24963. doi: 10.1002/jcla.24963. Epub 2023 Sep 7.
The Friedewald or Martin/Hopkins equation is widely used to estimate low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) at triglyceride (TG) levels <400 mg/dL. In this study, we aimed to validate the recently developed Sampson and extended Martin/Hopkins equations intended for use in patients with TG levels up to 800 mg/dL by comparing them to a direct homogenous assay.
In total, 8676 participants with serum TG levels <800 mg/dL were enrolled in this study. LDL-C was directly measured using Abbott homogeneous assay (DLDL) and estimated using the Friedewald (FLDL), Martin/Hopkins (MLDL), extended Martin/Hopkins (EMLDL), and Sampson equations (SLDL). The overall concordance between the DLDL and LDL-C estimates was calculated. The performance of the four equations was also compared using Bland-Altman plots and mean absolute difference (MAD).
The EMLDL was more accurate than other LDL-C equations particularly for patients with TG≥400 mg/dL (MAD = 10.43; vs. FLDL: MAD = 21.1; vs. SLDL: MAD 11.62). The overall concordance of FLDL, MLDL, EMLDL, and SLDL with DLDL in TG values ranging from 200 to 799 mg/dL were 52.2, 70.5, 71.6, and 65.7%, respectively (p < 0.001), demonstrating the EMLDL as the most optimal estimation method, particularly for high TG levels (≥200 mg/dL).
Both the original and extended Martin/Hopkins method are optimal in estimating LDL-C levels in clinical laboratories using the Abbott analyzer in patients with TG levels of 200-399 and 400-799 mg/dL, respectively. Meanwhile, caution is need that considerable underestimation of Friedewald and Sampson equation could lead to undertreatment in hypertriglyceridemia.
弗里德瓦尔德(Friedewald)或马丁/霍普金斯(Martin/Hopkins)方程被广泛用于估计甘油三酯(TG)水平<400mg/dL 的低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)。在这项研究中,我们旨在通过与直接均相测定法进行比较,验证最近开发的用于 TG 水平高达 800mg/dL 的 Sampson 和扩展 Martin/Hopkins 方程。
共有 8676 名 TG 水平<800mg/dL 的患者参与了这项研究。使用 Abbott 均相测定法(DLDL)直接测量 LDL-C,并使用弗里德瓦尔德(FLDL)、马丁/霍普金斯(MLDL)、扩展马丁/霍普金斯(EMLDL)和 Sampson 方程(SLDL)进行估计。计算了 DLDL 与 LDL-C 估计值之间的总一致性。还使用 Bland-Altman 图和平均绝对差(MAD)比较了四个方程的性能。
EMLDL 比其他 LDL-C 方程更准确,特别是对于 TG≥400mg/dL 的患者(MAD=10.43;与 FLDL 相比:MAD=21.1;与 SLDL 相比:MAD 11.62)。在 TG 值为 200-799mg/dL 的范围内,FLDL、MLDL、EMLDL 和 SLDL 与 DLDL 的总体一致性分别为 52.2%、70.5%、71.6%和 65.7%(p<0.001),表明 EMLDL 是最优化的估计方法,特别是对于高 TG 水平(≥200mg/dL)。
原始和扩展的 Martin/Hopkins 方法在使用 Abbott 分析仪在 TG 水平为 200-399 和 400-799mg/dL 的患者中分别是估计 LDL-C 水平的最佳方法。同时,需要注意,Friedewald 和 Sampson 方程的显著低估可能导致高甘油三酯血症的治疗不足。