Effects of comprehensive care measures based on the HAPA model on self-care, neurotransmitters and clinical outcomes in cerebral infarction patients.

OBJECTIVE

Cerebral infarction is induced by cerebral artery occlusion, resulting in ischemia, hypoxia, necrosis of brain cells in the corresponding blood supply area, and then dysfunction. Health action process approach (HAPA) model emphasizes the proposal and practice of health behavior as a whole and uses self-monitoring and encouraging ultimately developed health behavior. The present study explores the effects of comprehensive nursing measures of HAPA model on neurotransmitters, self-care ability and clinical outcomes of cerebral infarction patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

One hundred and ten patients with cerebral infarction diagnosed and treated in our hospital from July 2020 to February 2022 were included as the subjects. The subjects were randomly grouped as the control (55 patients) and the study group (55 patients) and received conventional nursing measures and additional comprehensive nursing measures of HAPA model, respectively. The patients were tested for changes in self-care ability, nerve damage [myelin basic protein (MBP), S100B, glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), neuron-specific enolase (NSE)] and neurotransmitter indexes [acid-soluble protein (Asp), neuropeptide Y (NPY), substance P (SP), glutamate (Glu)], respectively. The patients were considered as the good prognosis group (47 cases) and poor prognosis group (63 cases) according to the prognosis after comprehensive care. The logistic regression model was used to analyze the risk factors affecting the poor prognosis of patients with cerebral infarction.

RESULTS

After nursing, China Stroke Scale (CSS) score, the Fugl Meyer Rating Scale (FMA) score and Barthel index were significantly higher in both groups than before nursing, and all indexes were significantly higher in the study group than in the control group (p< 0.05). The length of hospital stay was significantly shorter in the study group than in the control group (p< 0.05). Compared with before nursing, the health knowledge, self-care skills, self-responsibility and self-concept of two groups were strongly increased after nursing, and the study group had much higher indexes than the control group (p< 0.05). After nursing, the levels of MBP, S100B, GFAP, NSE, Asp, NPY, SP and Glu in both groups were largely decreased, and more significant decrease was found in the study group (p< 0.05). Age, body mass index (BMI), hypertension history, coronary heart disease history and National Institutes of Health Stroke Score (NIHSS) score after treatment were significantly different between the good and poor prognosis groups (p< 0.05). The prognosis of patients in the study group was 52.73%, which was significantly higher than 32.73% in the control group (p< 0.05). Age, hypertension history, and post-treatment NIHSS score were independent risk factors related to poor prognosis by logistic multiple regression analysis (p< 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Comprehensive care measures of HAPA model may be used with advantage to improve the self-care ability, reduce the degree of neurological damage, and improve neurological function in cerebral infarction patients. Age, hypertension history, and NIHSS score after treatment were all risk factors related to poor prognosis.