Pan Luping, Jin Jiaolei, Huang Rui, Wang Wanping, Chen Qiuyue
Department of Neurology, Taizhou Central Hospital (Affiliated Hospital of Taizhou University), Taizhou 318000, Zhejiang, China. Corresponding author: Chen Qiuyue, Email:
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2020 Jul;32(7):835-839. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20200410-00281.
To investigate the application value of transcranial Doppler (TCD) in the prognosis assessment of nerve function in patients with acute cerebral infarction (ACI) after intracranial mechanical thrombectomy.
A retrospective analysis was conducted. The clinical data of 43 patients with acute anterior circulation cerebral infarction who received intra-arterial mechanical thrombotomy for recanalization admitted to Taizhou Central Hospital from January 2018 to December 2019 were analyzed. The modified Rankin scale (mRS) score of patients were followed up by telephone at 3 months after surgery to evaluate the prognosis of neurologic outcome. Patients with mRS score 0-2 were enrolled in the good prognosis group, while those with a score of 3-6 were enrolled in the poor prognosis group. The gender, age, past history, underlying diseases, occluded arteries, atherosclerotic stenosis and bridging treatment, time from onset to reperfusion, blood flow dynamics under TCD at 1 day after thrombectomy, and National Institutes of Health stroke scale (NIHSS) scores before and 1, 7, and 14 days after thrombectomy were compared between the two groups. Multivariate Logistic regression analysis was used to screen the prognostic factors of nerve function at 3 months after mechanical thrombectomy in patients with ACI. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was drawn to evaluate the prognostic value for neurological function assessed by TCD.
Forty-three patients were enrolled in the final analysis, with 23 patients in the good prognosis group and 20 in the poor prognosis group. The recanalization was successfully achieved in both groups without complications. However, the hemodynamics of intracranial arteries evaluated by TCD 1 day after operation in both groups still showed partial or complete occlusion, and the hemodynamics of patients in the poor prognosis group was worse than that in the good prognosis group (poor blood flow: 40.0% vs. 0%, inadequate blood flow: 30.0% vs. 17.4%, good blood flow: 30.0% vs. 82.6%), and the differences were statistically significant (all P < 0.01). Before thrombotomy, there was no significant difference in NIHSS score between the two groups. After thrombotomy, the NIHSS score of the two groups gradually decreased with the extension of time, but the NIHSS score at 14 days after operation of the poor prognosis group was still significantly higher than that of the good prognosis group (10.55±2.93 vs. 4.65±1.70, P < 0.01). Univariate analysis showed that compared with the good prognosis group, the proportion of patients with diabetes and arteriosclerosis stenosis in the poor prognosis group were significantly increased (30.0% vs. 4.3%, 45.0% vs. 17.4%, both P < 0.05), and the time from onset to reperfusion was prolonged (minutes: 385.9±96.2 vs. 294.5±95.1, P < 0.01). Multivariable Logistic regression analysis showed that the therosclerosis stenosis [odds ratio (OR) = 9.334, 95% confidence interval (95%CI) was 1.092-79.775, P = 0.041] and the reperfusion time (OR = 1.016, 95%CI was 1.006-1.027, P = 0.002) were associated with prognosis of nerve function at 3 months after mechanical thrombectomy in patients with ACI. ROC curve analysis suggested that the evaluation of intracranial hemodynamics by TCD might be able to predict the prognosis of neurological function in patients with ACI after 3 months of intracranial mechanical thrombectomy, the area under ROC curve (AUC) was 0.768 (95%CI was 0.620-0.917), the sensitivity was 65.0%, the specificity was 87.0%, the positive predictive value was 82.6%, and the negative predictive value was 70.0%.
The evaluation of intracranial hemodynamics assessed by TCD is helpful in early judging the prognosis of neurological function in patients with ACI after intracranial mechanical thrombectomy.
探讨经颅多普勒(TCD)在急性脑梗死(ACI)患者颅内机械取栓术后神经功能预后评估中的应用价值。
进行回顾性分析。分析2018年1月至2019年12月在台州中心医院接受动脉内机械血栓切除术以实现再通的43例急性前循环脑梗死患者的临床资料。术后3个月通过电话随访患者的改良Rankin量表(mRS)评分,以评估神经功能预后。mRS评分0 - 2分的患者纳入预后良好组,评分3 - 6分的患者纳入预后不良组。比较两组患者的性别、年龄、既往史、基础疾病、闭塞动脉、动脉粥样硬化狭窄及桥接治疗情况、发病至再灌注时间、取栓术后1天TCD检测的血流动力学以及取栓术前、术后1天、7天和14天的美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表(NIHSS)评分。采用多因素Logistic回归分析筛选ACI患者机械取栓术后3个月神经功能的预后因素。绘制受试者操作特征(ROC)曲线,评估TCD评估神经功能的预后价值。
最终纳入43例患者,其中预后良好组23例,预后不良组20例。两组均成功实现再通,无并发症发生。然而,两组术后1天通过TCD评估的颅内动脉血流动力学仍显示部分或完全闭塞,预后不良组患者的血流动力学比预后良好组更差(血流差:40.0% 对0%,血流不足:30.0% 对17.4%,血流良好:30.0% 对82.6%),差异有统计学意义(均P < 0.01)。取栓术前,两组NIHSS评分无显著差异。取栓术后,两组NIHSS评分随时间延长逐渐降低,但预后不良组术后14天的NIHSS评分仍显著高于预后良好组(10.55±2.93对4.65±1.70,P < 0.01)。单因素分析显示,与预后良好组相比,预后不良组糖尿病和动脉粥样硬化狭窄患者的比例显著增加(30.0% 对4.3%,45.0% 对17.4%,均P < 0.05),发病至再灌注时间延长(分钟:385.9±96.2对294.5±95.1,P < 0.01)。多因素Logistic回归分析显示,动脉粥样硬化狭窄[比值比(OR) = 9.334,95%置信区间(95%CI)为1.092 - 79.775,P = 0.041]和再灌注时间(OR = 1.016,95%CI为1.006 - 1.027,P = 0.002)与ACI患者机械取栓术后三个月神经功能预后相关。ROC曲线分析提示,TCD评估颅内血流动力学可能能够预测ACI患者颅内机械取栓术后3个月的神经功能预后,ROC曲线下面积(AUC)为0.768(95%CI为0.620 - 0.917),灵敏度为65.0%,特异度为87.0%,阳性预测值为82.6%,阴性预测值为70.0%。
TCD评估颅内血流动力学有助于早期判断ACI患者颅内机械取栓术后神经功能的预后。