• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过使用迷你根本原因分析与行动来减少因用药错误导致的非哨兵伤害事件。

Reducing Nonsentinel Harm Events due to Medication Errors by Using Mini-Root Cause Analysis and Action.

作者信息

Al Mardawi Ghada Hussain, Rajendram Rajkumar, Alowesie Souzan Mohammed, Alkatheri Mufareh

机构信息

Department of Quality Improvement, King Abdulaziz Medical City, King Abdulaziz International Medical Research Center, Ministry of National Guard - Health Affairs, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Department of Medicine, King Abdulaziz Medical City, King Abdulaziz International Medical Research Center, Ministry of National Guard - Health Affairs, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

Glob J Qual Saf Healthc. 2021 Mar 5;4(1):27-43. doi: 10.36401/JQSH-20-25. eCollection 2021 Feb.

DOI:10.36401/JQSH-20-25
PMID:37260533
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10229010/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

A full root cause analysis (RCA) such as that required following a sentinel event is time-consuming, labor-intensive, and expensive. This quality improvement project used a similar but abbreviated process (mini-RCA and action; mini-RCA) in response to medication errors that caused less serious harm.

METHODS

In 2018, all medication errors that caused harm due to system failures but were not sentinel events were investigated by mini-RCA. The incidence of similar medication errors reported in the year before and in the year after the introduction of mini-RCA was compared to determine the impact of this intervention. Similar events were identified by searching the safety reporting system database for reported medication errors by drug name (e.g., Humate® P) and/or event type (e.g., prescribing error-omission of a patient's home medications on admission to hospital). The time and labor costs of this intervention were estimated.

RESULTS

Seven medication errors were investigated by mini-RCA. More than 48 members of staff from 11 clinical and nonclinical departments contributed to the identification of 39 system failures and made 42 recommendations, of which 22 (52%) were implemented. This reduced the recurrence of reports of similar events from 35 (0.57%) to 21 (0.36%). Although this 0.21% absolute decrease did not achieve statistical significance, recurrence of similar harm events was reduced from 7 (0.11%) to 0 ( = 0.016). Benefits were greatest when the mini-RCA recommendations were fully implemented. This reduced the recurrence of similar events from 9 (0.21%) to 0 ( = 0.007). A total of 251 hours (mean ± SD, 35.9 ± 16.6 hours) were required for this intervention. The associated labor cost was Saudi Arabia Riyal (SAR) 34,181 (US $8256; mean SAR ± SD, 4883 ± 1302 [mean US $ ± SD, $2102 ± $561]).

CONCLUSION

The use of mini-RCA to review medication errors provided a structured process to manage reported events, monitor the implementation of recommendations, and assess the effectiveness of implemented actions. The use of this rapid process to investigate errors that cause harm but are not sentinel events reduced recurrence of similar medication errors. Although the time and cost required for this intervention is not insignificant, the cumulative benefit to patients, healthcare professionals, and the organization are greater.

摘要

引言

全面的根本原因分析(RCA),如在发生警讯事件后所要求进行的那样,既耗时、费力又昂贵。本质量改进项目针对造成不太严重伤害的用药错误,采用了类似但简化的流程(小型RCA及行动;小型RCA)。

方法

2018年,通过小型RCA对所有因系统故障导致伤害但并非警讯事件的用药错误进行了调查。比较在引入小型RCA之前和之后一年报告的类似用药错误的发生率,以确定该干预措施的影响。通过在安全报告系统数据库中按药品名称(如Humate® P)和/或事件类型(如处方错误——患者入院时遗漏家庭用药)搜索已报告的用药错误来识别类似事件。估算了该干预措施的时间和劳动力成本。

结果

通过小型RCA调查了7起用药错误。来自11个临床和非临床科室的48多名工作人员参与了识别39个系统故障并提出了42条建议,其中22条(52%)得到了实施。这使得类似事件报告的复发率从35起(0.57%)降至21起(0.36%)。尽管这0.21%的绝对降幅未达到统计学显著性,但类似伤害事件的复发率从7起(0.11%)降至0起(P = 0.016)。当小型RCA的建议得到充分实施时,益处最大。这使得类似事件的复发率从9起(0.21%)降至0起(P = 0.007)。该干预措施总共需要251小时(均值±标准差,35.9±16.6小时)。相关劳动力成本为沙特里亚尔(SAR)34,181(8256美元;均值SAR±标准差,4883±1302[均值美元±标准差,2102±561美元])。

结论

使用小型RCA来审查用药错误提供了一个结构化的流程,用于管理报告的事件、监测建议的实施情况以及评估已实施行动的有效性。使用这种快速流程来调查造成伤害但并非警讯事件的错误,减少了类似用药错误的复发。尽管该干预措施所需的时间和成本并非微不足道,但对患者、医疗专业人员和组织的累积益处更大。

相似文献

1
Reducing Nonsentinel Harm Events due to Medication Errors by Using Mini-Root Cause Analysis and Action.通过使用迷你根本原因分析与行动来减少因用药错误导致的非哨兵伤害事件。
Glob J Qual Saf Healthc. 2021 Mar 5;4(1):27-43. doi: 10.36401/JQSH-20-25. eCollection 2021 Feb.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Medication Dispensing Errors and Prevention药物调配错误与预防
4
Prevention of Surgical Errors手术失误的预防
5
Medical Error Reduction and Prevention减少和预防医疗差错
6
Reducing medication errors for adults in hospital settings.减少医院环境中成人的用药错误。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Nov 25;11(11):CD009985. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009985.pub2.
7
Our first review: an evaluation of effectiveness of root cause analysis recommendations in Hong Kong public hospitals.我们的首次综述:对香港公立医院根本原因分析建议有效性的评估。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Jun 5;20(1):507. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05356-6.
8
Effective interventions and implementation strategies to reduce adverse drug events in the Veterans Affairs (VA) system.在退伍军人事务部(VA)系统中减少药物不良事件的有效干预措施和实施策略。
Qual Saf Health Care. 2008 Feb;17(1):37-46. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2006.021816.
9
Patient Safety/Quality Improvement Primer, Part II: Prevention of Harm Through Root Cause Analysis and Action (RCA).患者安全/质量改进基础教程,第二部分:通过根本原因分析和行动(RCA)预防伤害。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019 Dec;161(6):911-921. doi: 10.1177/0194599819878683. Epub 2019 Oct 1.
10
Team experiences of the root cause analysis process after a sentinel event: a qualitative case study.哨兵事件后根本原因分析过程中的团队经验:定性案例研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Nov 8;23(1):1224. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-10178-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Using the Failure Mode and Effect Analysis Tool to Improve the Automatic Stop Order Process.使用失效模式与效应分析工具改进自动停止医嘱流程。
Glob J Qual Saf Healthc. 2024 Jul 10;7(4):197-206. doi: 10.36401/JQSH-24-9. eCollection 2024 Nov.
2
Medication safety climate from the perspectives of healthcare providers: A cross-sectional study.医疗服务提供者视角下的用药安全氛围:一项横断面研究。
J Educ Health Promot. 2023 Jun 30;12:195. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_1096_22. eCollection 2023.
3
Reducing Medication Harms: Thoughts and Strategies.减少用药危害:思考与策略
Glob J Qual Saf Healthc. 2021 Mar 5;4(1):1-2. doi: 10.36401/JQSH-20-X8. eCollection 2021 Feb.
4
Investigation of Medication Safety Incidents Using Root Cause Analysis and Action.使用根本原因分析与行动对用药安全事件进行调查。
Glob J Qual Saf Healthc. 2021 Mar 5;4(1):50-52. doi: 10.36401/JQSH-20-X9. eCollection 2021 Feb.

本文引用的文献

1
How Much of Root Cause Analysis Translates into Improved Patient Safety: A Systematic Review.根本原因分析在多大程度上转化为改善患者安全:系统评价。
Med Princ Pract. 2020;29(6):524-531. doi: 10.1159/000508677. Epub 2020 May 15.
2
Medication Errors: Is it the Hidden Part of the Submerged Iceberg in Our Health-care System?用药差错:它是我们医疗体系中隐藏在水下的冰山一角吗?
Int J Appl Basic Med Res. 2019 Jul-Sep;9(3):135-142. doi: 10.4103/ijabmr.IJABMR_96_19.
3
The Hidden Cost of Regulation: The Administrative Cost of Reporting Serious Reportable Events.监管的隐性成本:报告严重可报告事件的行政成本。
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2018 Apr;44(4):212-218. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2017.08.006. Epub 2018 Jan 3.
4
Our current approach to root cause analysis: is it contributing to our failure to improve patient safety?我们当前的根本原因分析方法:它是否导致了我们在改善患者安全方面的失败?
BMJ Qual Saf. 2017 May;26(5):381-387. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2016-005991. Epub 2016 Dec 9.
5
A cross-sectional study on the relationship between utilization of root cause analysis and patient safety at 139 Department of Veterans Affairs medical centers.一项关于139家退伍军人事务部医疗中心根本原因分析的应用与患者安全之间关系的横断面研究。
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2013 Jan;39(1):32-7. doi: 10.1016/s1553-7250(13)39006-0.
6
From a blame culture to a just culture in health care.从归咎文化到医疗公正文化。
Health Care Manage Rev. 2009 Oct-Dec;34(4):312-22. doi: 10.1097/HMR.0b013e3181a3b709.
7
The organizational costs of preventable medical errors.可预防医疗差错的组织成本。
Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 2001 Oct;27(10):533-9. doi: 10.1016/s1070-3241(01)27047-3.
8
Joint Commission sentinel event policy and procedures update.联合委员会警讯事件政策与程序更新
J AHIMA. 1999 Mar;70(3):49-50.
9
The costs of adverse drug events in hospitalized patients. Adverse Drug Events Prevention Study Group.住院患者药物不良事件的成本。药物不良事件预防研究组。
JAMA. 1997;277(4):307-11.
10
Adverse drug events in hospitalized patients. Excess length of stay, extra costs, and attributable mortality.住院患者的药物不良事件。住院时间延长、额外费用及可归因死亡率。
JAMA. 1997;277(4):301-6.