• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

哨兵事件后根本原因分析过程中的团队经验:定性案例研究。

Team experiences of the root cause analysis process after a sentinel event: a qualitative case study.

机构信息

Department of Health Sciences, Ålesund, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Larsgårdsvegen 2, Ålesund, 6025, Norway.

Faculty of Health Sciences and Social Care, Molde University College, PO. Box 2110, Molde, 6402, Norway.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Nov 8;23(1):1224. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-10178-3.

DOI:10.1186/s12913-023-10178-3
PMID:37940969
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10634119/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Root cause analysis (RCA) is a systematic approach, typically involving several stages, used in healthcare to identify the underlying causes of a medical error or sentinel event. This study focuses on how members of a Norwegian RCA team experience aspects of an RCA process and whether it complies with the Norwegian RCA method.

METHOD

Based on a sentinel event in which a child died unexpectedly during childbirth in a Norwegian hospital in 2021, the following research questions are addressed: 1. What was the RCA team's experience of the RCA process? 2. Was there compliance with the Norwegian RCA method in this case? A case study was chosen out of the desire to understand complex social phenomena and to allow in-depth focus on a case.

RESULTS

The result covered three main themes. The first theme related to the hospital's management system and aspects of the case that made it challenging to follow all recommendations in the Norwegian RCA guidelines. The second theme encompassed external and internal assessment. The RCA team was composed of members with methodological and medical expertise. However, the police's involvement in the case made it complex for the team to carry out the process. The third and final theme covered intrapersonal challenges RCA team members faced. Team members experienced various challenges during the RCA process, including being neutral, dealing with role-related challenges, grappling with ambivalence, and managing the additional time burden and resource constraints. As anticipated in the RCA guidelines, the team's ability to remain neutral was tested.

CONCLUSION

The findings of this study can help stakeholders better comprehend how an inter-professional RCA teamwork intervention can affect a healthcare organization and enhance the teamwork experience of healthcare staff while facilitating improvements in work processes and patient safety. Additionally, these results can guide stakeholders in creating, executing, utilizing, and educating others about RCA processes.

摘要

背景

根本原因分析(RCA)是一种系统方法,通常涉及几个阶段,用于医疗保健领域,以确定医疗错误或警戒事件的根本原因。本研究重点关注挪威 RCA 团队成员在多大程度上体验 RCA 过程的各个方面,以及该过程是否符合挪威 RCA 方法。

方法

基于 2021 年挪威一家医院在分娩期间一名儿童意外死亡的警戒事件,提出了以下研究问题:1. RCA 团队对 RCA 过程的体验是什么?2. 在这种情况下,是否符合挪威 RCA 方法?选择案例研究是出于对理解复杂社会现象的渴望,并允许对案例进行深入关注。

结果

结果涵盖了三个主要主题。第一个主题涉及医院的管理系统和案例的某些方面,这些方面使得难以遵循挪威 RCA 指南中的所有建议。第二个主题包括外部和内部评估。RCA 团队由具有方法学和医学专业知识的成员组成。然而,警方参与该案使得团队难以开展该过程。第三个也是最后一个主题涵盖了 RCA 团队成员面临的个人挑战。团队成员在 RCA 过程中面临各种挑战,包括保持中立、应对与角色相关的挑战、应对矛盾心理以及管理额外的时间负担和资源限制。正如 RCA 指南所预期的那样,团队保持中立的能力受到了考验。

结论

本研究的结果可以帮助利益相关者更好地理解跨专业 RCA 团队合作干预如何影响医疗保健组织,并增强医疗保健人员的团队合作体验,同时促进工作流程和患者安全的改进。此外,这些结果可以为利益相关者创建、执行、利用和教育他人有关 RCA 流程提供指导。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d04/10634119/a409784dd958/12913_2023_10178_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d04/10634119/1f842313870f/12913_2023_10178_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d04/10634119/a409784dd958/12913_2023_10178_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d04/10634119/1f842313870f/12913_2023_10178_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d04/10634119/a409784dd958/12913_2023_10178_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Team experiences of the root cause analysis process after a sentinel event: a qualitative case study.哨兵事件后根本原因分析过程中的团队经验:定性案例研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Nov 8;23(1):1224. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-10178-3.
2
What are the experiences of team members involved in root cause analysis? A qualitative study.团队成员参与根本原因分析的体验是什么?一项定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Oct 25;23(1):1152. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-10164-9.
3
Our first review: an evaluation of effectiveness of root cause analysis recommendations in Hong Kong public hospitals.我们的首次综述:对香港公立医院根本原因分析建议有效性的评估。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Jun 5;20(1):507. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05356-6.
4
Implementing root cause analysis in Iranian hospitals: challenges and benefits.在伊朗医院实施根本原因分析:挑战与益处
Int J Health Plann Manage. 2017 Apr;32(2):147-162. doi: 10.1002/hpm.2335. Epub 2016 Jan 12.
5
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
6
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
7
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
8
Healthcare stakeholders' perceptions and experiences of factors affecting the implementation of critical care telemedicine (CCT): qualitative evidence synthesis.医疗保健利益相关者对影响重症监护远程医疗(CCT)实施因素的看法和经验:定性证据综合分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Feb 18;2(2):CD012876. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012876.pub2.
9
Root cause analysis of critical events in neurosurgery, New South Wales.新南威尔士州神经外科危急事件的根本原因分析
ANZ J Surg. 2015 Sep;85(9):626-30. doi: 10.1111/ans.12934. Epub 2015 Jan 12.
10
Training health care professionals in root cause analysis: a cross-sectional study of post-training experiences, benefits and attitudes.培训医疗保健专业人员进行根本原因分析:一项关于培训后经验、收益和态度的横断面研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2013 Feb 7;13:50. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-50.

引用本文的文献

1
Tracing Missing Surgical Specimens: A Quality Improvement Strategy for Adverse Events Based on Root Cause Analysis.追踪缺失的手术标本:基于根本原因分析的不良事件质量改进策略
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2025 Jun 27;18:2139-2150. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S527015. eCollection 2025.
2
Hospital managers' experiences of conducting a root cause analysis: a case study following a sentinel event.医院管理人员进行根本原因分析的经验:一项哨点事件后的案例研究
Front Health Serv. 2025 Apr 29;5:1566335. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2025.1566335. eCollection 2025.
3
Experience of nurse-guided root cause analysis after a sentinel event: a qualitative study.

本文引用的文献

1
Implementing a human factors approach to RCA : Tools, processes and strategies.实施人为因素方法进行根本原因分析:工具、流程和策略。
J Healthc Risk Manag. 2021 Jul;41(1):31-46. doi: 10.1002/jhrm.21454. Epub 2020 Dec 19.
2
Hospital managers' perspectives with implementing quality improvement measures and a new regulatory framework: a qualitative case study.医院管理者对实施质量改进措施和新监管框架的看法:一项定性案例研究
BMJ Open. 2020 Dec 3;10(12):e042847. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042847.
3
Our first review: an evaluation of effectiveness of root cause analysis recommendations in Hong Kong public hospitals.
一起警讯事件后护士主导的根本原因分析经验:一项定性研究
BMC Nurs. 2025 Feb 6;24(1):140. doi: 10.1186/s12912-025-02787-6.
4
Is It Still Time for Safety Walkaround? Pilot Project Proposing a New Model and a Review of the Methodology.安全巡视是否仍有必要?一项提出新模式的试点项目和方法回顾。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 May 29;60(6):903. doi: 10.3390/medicina60060903.
我们的首次综述:对香港公立医院根本原因分析建议有效性的评估。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Jun 5;20(1):507. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05356-6.
4
How Much of Root Cause Analysis Translates into Improved Patient Safety: A Systematic Review.根本原因分析在多大程度上转化为改善患者安全:系统评价。
Med Princ Pract. 2020;29(6):524-531. doi: 10.1159/000508677. Epub 2020 May 15.
5
Implementation and strength of root cause analysis recommendations following serious adverse events involving paediatric patients in the Queensland public health system between 2012 and 2014.2012 年至 2014 年期间昆士兰州公立卫生系统内涉及儿科患者的严重不良事件后,根本原因分析建议的实施情况和力度。
J Paediatr Child Health. 2019 Sep;55(9):1070-1076. doi: 10.1111/jpc.14344. Epub 2018 Dec 23.
6
Experience feedback committees: A way of implementing a root cause analysis practice in hospital medical departments.经验反馈委员会:在医院医疗部门实施根本原因分析实践的一种方式。
PLoS One. 2018 Jul 26;13(7):e0201067. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0201067. eCollection 2018.
7
Using systems thinking in patient safety: a case study on medicines management.在患者安全中运用系统思维:药品管理案例研究
Nurs Manag (Harrow). 2017 Jun 29;24(4):28-33. doi: 10.7748/nm.2017.e1621.
8
Our current approach to root cause analysis: is it contributing to our failure to improve patient safety?我们当前的根本原因分析方法:它是否导致了我们在改善患者安全方面的失败?
BMJ Qual Saf. 2017 May;26(5):381-387. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2016-005991. Epub 2016 Dec 9.
9
How to perform a root cause analysis for workup and future prevention of medical errors: a review.如何对医学检查及未来医疗差错预防进行根本原因分析:综述
Patient Saf Surg. 2016 Sep 21;10:20. doi: 10.1186/s13037-016-0107-8. eCollection 2016.
10
Effect size of contributory factors on adverse events: an analysis of RCA series in a teaching hospital.促成因素对不良事件的效应量:一家教学医院的根本原因分析系列研究
J Diabetes Metab Disord. 2016 Jul 28;15:27. doi: 10.1186/s40200-016-0249-3. eCollection 2015.