Centre for Carbon Water and Food, School of Life and Environmental Sciences, The University of Sydney, Camden, NSW 2570, Australia.
School of Environmental and Rural Science, University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia.
Res Vet Sci. 2023 Jul;160:30-38. doi: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2023.05.006. Epub 2023 May 17.
Subacute ruminal acidosis (SARA) in feedlot cattle during the feed transition to grain-based diets is a significant constraint to animal health and productivity. This experiment assessed an antibiotic-free supplement (ProTect®) effects on ruminal pH variability and methane (CH) emissions of cattle during the challenge of SARA. Ten 18-month-old Angus steers (472 ± 4.8 kg) were randomly allocated into monensin (n = 5) and ProTect® groups (n = 5) and progressively introduced to grain diets incorporating monensin or ProTect® for 36 days of the experiment [starter (7 days; 45% grain), T1 (7 days; 56% grain), T2 (7 days; 67% grain), finisher (15 days; 78% grain)]. The pH variability on the finisher period was reduced by the ProTect® supplement (6.6% vs. 5.2%; P < 0.01), with CH emissions being significantly higher relative to the monensin group [88.2 g/day (9.3 g CH/kg DMI) vs. 133.7 g/day (14.1 g CH/kg DMI); P < 0.01]. There was no difference between treatments in the time spent on the ruminal pH < 5.6 or < 5.8 (P > 0.05). The model evaluation for the ruminal pH variation indicated that the mean absolute error (MAE) proportion for both groups was good within the same range [4.05% (monensin) vs. 4.25% (ProTect®)] with identical root mean square prediction error (RMSPE) (0.34). It is concluded that the ProTect® supplement is an effective alternative to monensin for preventing SARA in feedlot cattle by managing ruminal pH variation during the transition to high-grain diets. Both monensin and ProTect® supplemented cattle exhibited lower CH yield compared to cattle fed forages and low-concentrate diets.
在育肥牛从饲料过渡到谷物日粮期间,亚急性瘤胃酸中毒(SARA)是动物健康和生产力的重大限制因素。本试验评估了一种无抗生素的补充剂(ProTect®)对 SARA 挑战期间牛瘤胃 pH 变异性和甲烷(CH)排放的影响。10 头 18 月龄安格斯阉牛(472±4.8kg)被随机分配到莫能菌素(n=5)和 ProTect®组(n=5),并在试验的 36 天内逐渐引入含有莫能菌素或 ProTect®的谷物日粮[起始(7 天;45%谷物)、T1(7 天;56%谷物)、T2(7 天;67%谷物)、育肥期(15 天;78%谷物)]。ProTect®补充剂降低了育肥期的 pH 变异性(6.6%对 5.2%;P<0.01),与莫能菌素组相比,CH 排放量显著增加[88.2g/天(9.3g CH/kg DMI)对 133.7g/天(14.1g CH/kg DMI);P<0.01]。两种处理方法在瘤胃酸度<5.6 或<5.8 的时间上没有差异(P>0.05)。瘤胃 pH 变化的模型评估表明,两组的平均绝对误差(MAE)比例在同一范围内都很好[4.05%(莫能菌素)对 4.25%(ProTect®)],具有相同的均方根预测误差(RMSPE)(0.34)。结论:ProTect®补充剂是一种有效的莫能菌素替代品,可通过在向高谷物日粮过渡期间管理瘤胃 pH 变化来预防育肥牛的 SARA。与饲喂草料和低浓缩日粮的牛相比,莫能菌素和 ProTect®补充的牛的 CH 产量较低。