• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

分类和主题关系依赖于不同类型的语义特征:来自 fMRI 元分析和语义启动研究的证据。

Taxonomic and thematic relations rely on different types of semantic features: Evidence from an fMRI meta-analysis and a semantic priming study.

机构信息

School of Philosophy, Psychology & Language Sciences, University of Edinburgh, UK.

School of Philosophy, Psychology & Language Sciences, University of Edinburgh, UK.

出版信息

Brain Lang. 2023 Jul;242:105287. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2023.105287. Epub 2023 May 31.

DOI:10.1016/j.bandl.2023.105287
PMID:37263104
Abstract

Taxonomic and thematic relations are major components of semantic representation but their neurocognitive underpinnings are still debated. We hypothesised that taxonomic relations preferentially activate parts of anterior temporal lobe (ATL) because they rely more on colour and shape features, while thematic relations preferentially activate temporoparietal cortex (TPC) because they rely more on action and location knowledge. We first conducted activation likelihood estimation (ALE) meta-analysis to assess evidence for neural specialisation in the existing fMRI literature (Study 1), then used a primed semantic judgement task to examine if the two relations are primed by different feature types (Study 2). We find that taxonomic relations show minimal feature-based specialisation but preferentially activate the lingual gyrus. Thematic relations are more dependent on action and location features and preferentially engage TPC. The meta-analysis also showed that lateral ATL is preferentially engaged by Thematic relations, which may reflect their greater reliance on verbal associations.

摘要

分类和主题关系是语义表示的主要组成部分,但它们的神经认知基础仍存在争议。我们假设,分类关系优先激活前颞叶(ATL)的某些部分,因为它们更多地依赖于颜色和形状特征,而主题关系优先激活颞顶叶皮层(TPC),因为它们更多地依赖于动作和位置知识。我们首先进行激活似然估计(ALE)荟萃分析,以评估现有 fMRI 文献中神经特化的证据(研究 1),然后使用启动语义判断任务来检查这两种关系是否由不同的特征类型启动(研究 2)。我们发现,分类关系显示出最小的基于特征的特化,但优先激活舌回。主题关系更依赖于动作和位置特征,优先激活 TPC。荟萃分析还表明,外侧 ATL 优先参与主题关系,这可能反映了它们对语言联想的更大依赖。

相似文献

1
Taxonomic and thematic relations rely on different types of semantic features: Evidence from an fMRI meta-analysis and a semantic priming study.分类和主题关系依赖于不同类型的语义特征:来自 fMRI 元分析和语义启动研究的证据。
Brain Lang. 2023 Jul;242:105287. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2023.105287. Epub 2023 May 31.
2
Dissociations in semantic cognition: Oscillatory evidence for opposing effects of semantic control and type of semantic relation in anterior and posterior temporal cortex.语义认知中的分离:前颞叶和后颞叶皮质中语义控制和语义关系类型的相反效应的振荡证据。
Cortex. 2019 Nov;120:308-325. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2019.07.002. Epub 2019 Jul 16.
3
Phase synchronization during the processing of taxonomic and thematic relations.在分类和主题关系处理过程中的相位同步。
Brain Lang. 2024 Feb;249:105379. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2024.105379. Epub 2024 Jan 18.
4
Intracranial EEG evidence of functional specialization for taxonomic and thematic relations.颅内脑电图证据表明在分类和主题关系上具有功能专业化。
Cortex. 2021 Jul;140:40-50. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2021.03.018. Epub 2021 Apr 9.
5
Doctor, Teacher, and Stethoscope: Neural Representation of Different Types of Semantic Relations.医生、教师和听诊器:不同类型语义关系的神经表示。
J Neurosci. 2018 Mar 28;38(13):3303-3317. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2562-17.2018. Epub 2018 Feb 23.
6
The neurocognitive basis of knowledge about object identity and events: dissociations reflect opposing effects of semantic coherence and control.关于物体身份和事件的知识的神经认知基础:分离反映了语义连贯性和控制的相反影响。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2020 Feb 3;375(1791):20190300. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2019.0300. Epub 2019 Dec 16.
7
Automatic processing of semantic relations in fMRI: neural activation during semantic priming of taxonomic and thematic categories.功能磁共振成像中语义关系的自动处理:分类和主题类别语义启动期间的神经激活
Brain Res. 2008 Jul 7;1218:194-205. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2008.03.045. Epub 2008 Apr 1.
8
Both frontal and temporal cortex exhibit phonological and semantic specialization during spoken language processing in 7- to 8-year-old children.在 7 至 8 岁儿童的口语处理过程中,额叶和颞叶皮层都表现出语音和语义的专门化。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2021 Aug 1;42(11):3534-3546. doi: 10.1002/hbm.25450. Epub 2021 May 5.
9
Automatic and Controlled Semantic Retrieval: TMS Reveals Distinct Contributions of Posterior Middle Temporal Gyrus and Angular Gyrus.自动与受控语义检索:经颅磁刺激揭示颞中回后部和角回的不同作用
J Neurosci. 2015 Nov 18;35(46):15230-9. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4705-14.2015.
10
The neural bases of taxonomic and thematic conceptual relations: an MEG study.分类和主题概念关系的神经基础:一项 MEG 研究。
Neuropsychologia. 2015 Feb;68:176-89. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.01.011. Epub 2015 Jan 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Functional magnetic resonance imaging of taxonomic and thematic processing of abstract and concrete word pairs.抽象词与具体词对的分类和主题处理的功能磁共振成像
J Neuropsychol. 2025 Sep;19(3):541-558. doi: 10.1111/jnp.12424. Epub 2025 Mar 29.
2
A Rose by Any Other Name: Mapping Taxonomic and Thematic Naming Errors Poststroke.换个玫瑰名:中风后分类和主题命名错误的映射。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2024 Oct 1;36(10):2251-2267. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_02236.
3
Representation of event and object concepts in ventral anterior temporal lobe and angular gyrus.
腹侧前颞叶和角回中事件与物体概念的表征。
Cereb Cortex. 2024 Jan 31;34(2). doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhad519.