Medical Sciences Division, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Brain Behav Immun. 2023 Aug;112:85-95. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2023.05.014. Epub 2023 May 30.
The association between COVID-19 and subsequent neurological and psychiatric disorders is well established. However, two important questions remain unanswered. First, what are the risks in those admitted to intensive care unit (ICU) with COVID-19? Admission to ICU is itself associated with neurological and psychiatric sequelae and it is not clear whether COVID-19 further increases those risks or changes their profile. Second, what are the trajectories of neurological and psychiatric risks in patients admitted to hospital or ICU with COVID-19, and when do the risks subside? We sought to answer these two questions using a retrospective cohort study based on electronic health records (EHR) data from the TriNetX Analytics Network (covering 89 million patients, mostly in the USA). Cohorts of patients admitted to hospital or ICU with COVID-19 were propensity score-matched (for 82 covariates capturing risk factors for COVID-19 and more severe COVID-19 illness) to patients admitted to hospital or ICU (respectively) for any other reason. Matched cohorts were followed for up to two years and the risk of 14 neurological and psychiatric outcomes were compared. A total of 280,173 patients admitted to hospital and 46,573 patients admitted to ICU with COVID-19 were successfully matched to an equal number of patients admitted to hospital or ICU for any other reason. Those hospitalised with COVID-19 were found to be at a greater risk of a range of neurological and psychiatric outcomes including seizure/epilepsy, encephalitis, myoneural junction/muscle disease, Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS), dementia, cognitive deficits, psychotic disorder, mood and anxiety disorders, but not ischaemic stroke or intracranial haemorrhage. When risks were elevated after COVID-19, most remained so for the whole two years of follow-up (except for mood and anxiety disorders). Risk profiles and trajectories were substantially different among those admitted to ICU: compared to those admitted for any other reasons, those admitted with COVID-19 were at a greater risk of myoneural junction/muscle disease, GBS, cognitive deficits and anxiety disorder, but at a significantly lower risk of ischaemic stroke, intracranial haemorrhage, encephalitis, and mood disorder. When elevated, the risks in those admitted to ICU with COVID-19 were mostly short-lived. In summary, risks of neurological and psychiatric sequelae in patients hospitalised with COVID-19 are wide ranging and long standing whereas those in patients admitted to ICU with COVID-19 are similar to, or lower than, the risks observed post-ICU admission for any other cause. These contrasting risk trajectories are relevant for researchers, clinicians, patients, and policymakers.
新型冠状病毒病(COVID-19)与随后发生的神经和精神障碍之间存在关联,这一点已得到充分证实。然而,目前仍有两个重要问题尚未得到解答。首先,因 COVID-19 而住进重症监护病房(ICU)的患者存在哪些风险?住进 ICU 本身就与神经和精神后遗症相关,目前尚不清楚 COVID-19 是否会进一步增加这些风险,或者改变这些风险的特征。其次,因 COVID-19 而住进医院或 ICU 的患者的神经和精神风险轨迹如何,以及这些风险何时会消退?我们试图通过基于 TriNetX 分析网络(覆盖 8900 万患者,主要来自美国)的电子健康记录(EHR)数据进行一项回顾性队列研究来回答这两个问题。我们将因 COVID-19 而住进医院或 ICU 的患者队列与因任何其他原因住进医院或 ICU 的患者队列进行倾向性评分匹配(针对 82 个混杂因素,这些因素可捕捉 COVID-19 及更严重 COVID-19 疾病的风险因素)。对匹配的队列进行了长达两年的随访,并比较了 14 种神经和精神结局的风险。共有 280173 名因 COVID-19 而住进医院的患者和 46573 名因 COVID-19 而住进 ICU 的患者成功匹配到了因任何其他原因住进医院或 ICU 的人数相等的患者。研究发现,因 COVID-19 而住院的患者发生一系列神经和精神结局的风险更高,包括癫痫/癫痫发作、脑炎、肌神经接头/肌肉疾病、格林-巴利综合征(GBS)、痴呆、认知缺陷、精神病性障碍、情绪和焦虑障碍,但不会发生缺血性中风或颅内出血。COVID-19 后出现风险升高的患者,在整个两年的随访期间,大多数风险仍然升高(情绪和焦虑障碍除外)。入住 ICU 的患者的风险特征和轨迹存在显著差异:与因任何其他原因入住 ICU 的患者相比,因 COVID-19 入住 ICU 的患者发生肌神经接头/肌肉疾病、GBS、认知缺陷和焦虑障碍的风险更高,但发生缺血性中风、颅内出血、脑炎和情绪障碍的风险显著降低。当 ICU 中 COVID-19 患者的风险升高时,这些风险大多是短暂的。总之,因 COVID-19 而住院的患者发生神经和精神后遗症的风险范围广泛且持续时间较长,而因 COVID-19 而住进 ICU 的患者的风险与因任何其他原因住进 ICU 后的风险相似,或者更低。这些对比鲜明的风险轨迹对研究人员、临床医生、患者和政策制定者具有重要意义。