皮质轨迹固定与传统椎弓根螺钉固定治疗骨质疏松性腰椎退变性疾病:一项前瞻性随机对照试验。
Cortical Trajectory Fixation Versus Traditional Pedicle-Screw Fixation in the Treatment of Lumbar Degenerative Patients with Osteoporosis: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.
机构信息
Department of Spine Surgery, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University of China, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
出版信息
Clin Interv Aging. 2022 Feb 23;17:175-184. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S349533. eCollection 2022.
STUDY DESIGN
This was a prospective randomized controlled trial study.
OBJECTIVE
To elucidate clinical and radiographic outcomes and complications of cortical bone trajectory (CBT)-screw fixation in patients with osteoporosis at 24-month follow-up and to compare the results with those after transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) using traditional pedicle screw (PS) fixation.
METHODS
We enrolled 124 patients and randomly assigned them to two groups (each group had 62 participants). The primary outcome was fusion rate. Secondary outcomes were VAS, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores, operation duration, incision length, estimated blood loss, drainage volume, radiological outcomes, and complications.
RESULTS
At the 6- and 12-month follow-up points, similar fusion rates were observed based on CT scans in both groups (=0.583 and 0.583). CBT provided significantly better short-term functional status at 3 months postoperation on ODI and JOA scores (=0.012 and 0) and similar improvements in pain intensity and functional status at other follow-up points. In addition, CBT resulted in significantly better surgical characteristics. Notably, CBT fixation led to lower incidence of screw loosening (=0.006).
CONCLUSION
CBT-screw fixation for single-level lumbar fusion in patients with osteoporosis provided improvement in clinical symptoms comparable to that of TLIF using PS fixation. Significantly better lumbar stability was found in the CBT group. We suggest that CBT-screw fixation is a reasonable and superior alternative to PS in TLIF in osteoporosis.
TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER
ChiCTR1900022658.
DATE OF REGISTRATION
April 20, 2019.
研究设计
这是一项前瞻性随机对照试验研究。
目的
阐明骨质疏松症患者在 24 个月随访时皮质骨轨迹(CBT)螺钉固定的临床和影像学结果及并发症,并与传统经椎间孔腰椎体间融合(TLIF)使用传统椎弓根螺钉(PS)固定的结果进行比较。
方法
我们纳入了 124 名患者并将其随机分配到两组(每组 62 名患者)。主要结局是融合率。次要结局是视觉模拟评分(VAS)、Oswestry 功能障碍指数(ODI)和日本骨科协会(JOA)评分、手术时间、切口长度、估计失血量、引流量、影像学结果和并发症。
结果
在 6 个月和 12 个月的随访时,两组的 CT 扫描显示融合率相似(=0.583 和 0.583)。CBT 在术后 3 个月的 ODI 和 JOA 评分上提供了更好的短期功能状态(=0.012 和 0),并且在其他随访时间点的疼痛强度和功能状态方面也有相似的改善。此外,CBT 导致了更好的手术特征。值得注意的是,CBT 固定导致螺钉松动的发生率显著降低(=0.006)。
结论
在骨质疏松症患者中,单节段腰椎融合术采用 CBT 螺钉固定可改善临床症状,与 PS 固定 TLIF 相当。CBT 组的腰椎稳定性明显更好。我们建议 CBT 螺钉固定是 TLIF 治疗骨质疏松症的一种合理且优越的替代 PS 的方法。
临床试验注册号
ChiCTR1900022658。
注册日期
2019 年 4 月 20 日。
相似文献
引用本文的文献
N Am Spine Soc J. 2025-5-27
本文引用的文献
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2020-9-15
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2019-5-21
Global Spine J. 2018-9