Mental Health Center Amager, University Hospital Copenhagen, Denmark.
Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.
Psychol Med. 2023 Oct;53(13):5902-5908. doi: 10.1017/S0033291723001605. Epub 2023 Jun 2.
Despite being a relatively new concept, psychiatric comorbidity, i.e. the co-occurrence of two or more mental disorders, has become widespread in clinical practice and psychiatric research. In this article, we trace the origin of the concept of psychiatric comorbidity, discuss the conceptual literature and point to basic problems concerning inadequate definition of the concept, differential diagnostic issues, and reification of mental disorders. We illustrate how these problems may have consequences for diagnostic assessment in current clinical practice and psychiatric research. To address some of the problems related to psychiatric comorbidity, we discuss potential principles for assessing psychiatric comorbidity. Inspired by Feinstein's original concept of comorbidity in general medicine and his differential diagnostic principles, we emphasize the importance of of mental disorders when assessing psychiatric comorbidity. We suggest that knowledge of . conditions and of the multitudinous clinical manifestations beyond what is captured in the diagnostic manuals may be helpful for assessing the independence of mental disorders and thus psychiatric comorbidity. We further argue that a more hierarchical diagnostic system and explicit exclusionary rules could improve clinical practice and research by reducing informational complexity and combating unwarranted psychiatric comorbidity.
尽管精神共病(即两种或多种精神障碍同时发生)是一个相对较新的概念,但它在临床实践和精神科研究中已经变得非常普遍。在本文中,我们追溯了精神共病概念的起源,讨论了概念文献,并指出了该概念定义不充分、鉴别诊断问题以及精神障碍具体化等基本问题。我们举例说明了这些问题可能对当前临床实践和精神科研究中的诊断评估产生的影响。为了解决与精神共病相关的一些问题,我们讨论了评估精神共病的潜在原则。受 Feinstein 在一般医学中对共病的原始概念及其鉴别诊断原则的启发,我们强调在评估精神共病时考虑精神障碍的多维度表现的重要性。我们认为,了解 疾病以及诊断手册中未涵盖的众多临床表现可能有助于评估精神障碍的独立性,从而评估精神共病。我们进一步认为,更具层级性的诊断系统和明确的排除规则可以通过减少信息复杂性和消除不必要的精神共病来改善临床实践和研究。