School of Nursing, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.
School of Nursing, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Stress Health. 2024 Feb;40(1):e3279. doi: 10.1002/smi.3279. Epub 2023 Jun 2.
Various types of stress and the choice of coping strategies may be risk factors for higher levels of sleep disturbance in oncology patients. Purposes were to evaluate for differences in global, cancer-specific, and cumulative life stress, as well as resilience and the use of coping strategies among three subgroups of patients with distinct sleep disturbance profiles (i.e., Low, High, Very High). Oncology outpatients (n = 1331) completed measures of global (Perceived Stress Scale), cancer-specific (Impact of Event Scale-Revised), and cumulative life (Life Stressor Checklist-Revised) stress, resilience (Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale) and coping (Brief Cope) prior to their second or third cycle of chemotherapy. Sleep disturbance was assessed six times over two chemotherapy cycles. Differences were evaluated using parametric and non-parametric tests. All stress measures showed a dose response effect (i.e., as the sleep disturbance profile worsened, levels of all types of stress increased). Compared to Low class, the other two classes reported higher levels of global perceived stress and higher occurrence rates and effect from previous stressful life events. Impact of Event Scale-Revised scores for the Very High class indicated post-traumatic symptomatology. Patients in High and Very High classes had resilience scores below the normative score for the United States population and used a higher number of disengagement coping strategies. Our findings suggest that very high levels of sleep disturbance are associated with higher levels of various types of stress, lower levels of resilience, and higher use of disengagement coping strategies. Clinicians need to perform routine assessments and implement symptom management interventions to reduce stress and encourage the use of engagement coping strategies.
各种类型的压力和应对策略的选择可能是肿瘤患者睡眠障碍程度较高的风险因素。目的是评估具有不同睡眠障碍特征的三组患者(即低、高、极高)之间的整体、癌症特异性和累积生活压力,以及弹性和应对策略的使用方面是否存在差异。1331 名肿瘤门诊患者在接受第二或第三周期化疗前完成了整体(感知压力量表)、癌症特异性(修订后的事件影响量表)和累积生活(生活应激源检查表修订版)压力、弹性(Connor-Davidson 弹性量表)和应对(简短应对量表)的测量。在两个化疗周期中,共进行了六次睡眠障碍评估。使用参数和非参数检验评估差异。所有压力测量都表现出剂量反应效应(即,随着睡眠障碍特征的恶化,所有类型的压力水平都增加)。与低分类相比,其他两个分类报告了更高水平的整体感知压力以及更高的发生率和来自以前压力性生活事件的影响。极高分类的修订后的事件影响量表得分表明存在创伤后症状。高分类和极高分类的患者的弹性评分低于美国人群的正常评分,并且使用了更多的脱离应对策略。我们的研究结果表明,非常高的睡眠障碍水平与更高水平的各种压力、更低的弹性和更高的脱离应对策略的使用相关。临床医生需要进行常规评估并实施症状管理干预,以减轻压力并鼓励使用参与应对策略。