Olearo Flaminia, Zanichelli Veronica, Exarchakou Aimilia, Both Anna, Uςkay Ilker, Aepfelbacher Martin, Rohde Holger
Institute of Medical Microbiology, Virology and Hygiene, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Departement of Infectious Diseases, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2023 May 7;10(5):ofad246. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofad246. eCollection 2023 May.
The aim of this systematic review was to address the question if short antibiotic treatment (SAT; at least 4 but <12 weeks) versus long antibiotic treatment (LAT) affects outcomes in prosthetic joint infections (PJIs). Database research (Medline, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane) retrieved 3740 articles, of which 10 studies were included in the analysis. Compared to LAT, 11% lower odds of treatment failure in the SAT group were found, although the difference was not statistically significant (pooled odds ratio, 0.89 [95% confidence interval, .53-1.50]). No difference in treatment failure was found between SAT and LAT once stratified by type of surgery, studies conducted in the United States versus Europe, study design, and follow-up. There is still no conclusive evidence that antibiotic treatment of PJIs for 12 weeks or longer is associated with better outcomes, irrespective of the type of surgical procedure. Most recent, high-quality studies tend to favor longer antibiotic courses, making them preferable in most situations.
本系统评价的目的是探讨短期抗生素治疗(SAT;至少4周但少于12周)与长期抗生素治疗(LAT)相比,对人工关节感染(PJI)结局的影响。通过数据库检索(Medline、Embase、Web of Science、Scopus、Cochrane)共获取3740篇文章,其中10项研究纳入分析。与LAT相比,SAT组治疗失败的几率低11%,尽管差异无统计学意义(合并比值比,0.89[95%置信区间,0.53 - 1.50])。按手术类型、在美国与欧洲开展的研究、研究设计和随访进行分层后,未发现SAT与LAT在治疗失败方面存在差异。目前仍没有确凿证据表明,无论手术方式如何,PJI使用抗生素治疗12周或更长时间会带来更好的结局。最近的高质量研究倾向于支持更长疗程的抗生素治疗,这使得在大多数情况下更长疗程的治疗更可取。