Department of Chemistry, School of Natural Sciences, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.
Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2023 Jun 28;25(25):16735-16744. doi: 10.1039/d3cp01278f.
The use of magnetisation decay measurements to characterise very slow relaxation of the magnetisation in single-molecule magnets is becoming increasingly prevalent as relaxation times move to longer timescales outside of the AC susceptibility range. However, experimental limitations and a poor understanding of the distribution underlying the stretched exponential function, commonly used to model the data, may be leading to misinterpretation of the results. Herein we develop guidelines on the experimental design, data fitting, and analysis required to accurately interpret magnetisation decay measurements. Various measures of the magnetic relaxation rate extracted from magnetisation decay measurements of [Dy(Dtp)][Al{OC(CF)}] previously characterised by Evans , fitted using combinations of fixing or freely fitting different parameters, are compared to those obtained using the innovative square-wave "waveform" technique of Hilgar The waveform technique is comparable to AC susceptometry for measurement of relaxation rates on long timescales. The most reliable measure of the relaxation time for magnetisation decays is found to be the average logarithmic relaxation time, e, obtained a fit of the decay trace using a stretched exponential function, where the initial and equilibrium magnetisation are fixed to first measured point and target values respectively. This new definition causes the largest differences to traditional approaches in the presence of large distributions or relaxation rates, with differences up to 50% with = 0.45, and hence could have a significant impact on the chemical interpretation of magnetic relaxation rates. A necessary step in progressing towards chemical control of magnetic relaxation is the accurate determination of relaxation times, and such large variations in experimental measures stress the need for consistency in fitting and interpretation of magnetisation decays.
利用磁化退磁场测量来描述单分子磁体中磁化的非常缓慢弛豫,随着弛豫时间移动到交流磁化率范围之外的较长时间尺度,这种方法变得越来越普遍。然而,实验限制和对扩展指数函数分布的理解不足,通常用于对数据进行建模,可能导致对结果的误解。在这里,我们为磁化退磁场测量的实验设计、数据拟合和分析制定了指导方针,以准确解释磁化退磁场测量结果。从以前由 Evans 表征的 [Dy(Dtp)][Al{OC(CF)}]的磁化退磁场测量中提取的各种磁弛豫率的测量值,通过固定或自由拟合不同参数的组合进行拟合,与使用 Hilgar 的创新方波“波形”技术获得的测量值进行比较。该波形技术在长时间尺度上测量弛豫率时,与交流磁化率相当。对于磁化退磁场,最可靠的弛豫时间测量值是使用扩展指数函数拟合衰减迹线时得到的平均对数弛豫时间 e,其中初始和平衡磁化强度分别固定到第一次测量点和目标值。这种新的定义在存在大分布或弛豫率的情况下,与传统方法存在最大差异,差异高达 50%,当 = 0.45 时,因此可能对磁弛豫率的化学解释产生重大影响。在朝着化学控制磁弛豫的方向前进的过程中,准确确定弛豫时间是必要的步骤,实验测量中如此大的差异强调了在磁化退磁场拟合和解释方面保持一致性的必要性。