IMU Centre for Education and School of Pharmacy, International Medical University, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
IMU Centre for Education and School of Medicine, International Medical University, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
BMC Med Educ. 2023 Jun 2;23(1):397. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04368-0.
Open book examinations have been used to assess students' higher order cognitive skills. These examinations can be conducted online remotely with the advancement of technology. However, there are concerns regarding its validity and reliability particularly if the examinations are not proctored. The objective of this study was to explore the perceptions of faculty and students in health professions programmes about remote online open book examinations (ROOBE).
Semi-structured interviews were conducted among 22 faculty staff who were involved in ROOBE in health professions programmes. All interviews were audio recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed using a thematic analysis approach. The perceptions of 249 medical students were obtained using an online questionnaire after they completed ROOBE.
The faculty agreed that open book examinations could promote students' higher order cognitive skills and reduce students' stress. However, they were concerned about students' academic integrity during non-invigilated ROOBE which could affect recognition by accreditation and professional bodies. The shift from traditional practice of closed-book examinations to ROOBE required change management with the support of guidelines and faculty training. Majority of the students claimed that the examinations were challenging as they assessed their ability to apply knowledge in real world problems. Nevertheless, they preferred ROOBE due to less anxiety and memorisation, and more emphasis on problem solving skills. The shortcomings were insufficient time for information searching during examinations and uncertainty in preparedness for future practice as they focused less on memorisation of factual knowledge during examination preparation. Cheating among peers and internet instability during non-invigilated ROOBE were the concerns highlighted by some students.
Faculty and students expressed favourable views about ROOBE in promoting higher order cognitive skills. Adequate technological support was essential during ROOBE. While there was a need to address issues related to academic integrity, ROOBE could be included as an authentic assessment within the systems of assessment.
开卷考试已被用于评估学生的高阶认知技能。随着技术的进步,这些考试可以在网上远程进行。然而,人们对其有效性和可靠性存在担忧,尤其是在考试无人监考的情况下。本研究的目的是探讨健康专业课程的教师和学生对远程在线开卷考试(ROOBE)的看法。
对参与健康专业课程 ROOBE 的 22 名教师进行了半结构化访谈。所有访谈均进行录音,并逐字转录,采用主题分析方法进行分析。在学生完成 ROOBE 后,通过在线问卷获得了 249 名医学生的意见。
教师们一致认为开卷考试可以促进学生的高阶认知技能,并减轻学生的压力。然而,他们担心在无人监考的情况下学生的学术诚信问题,这可能会影响到认证和专业机构的认可。从传统的闭卷考试向 ROOBE 转变需要变革管理,同时需要指南和教师培训的支持。大多数学生表示,考试具有挑战性,因为它们评估了他们在现实世界问题中应用知识的能力。然而,他们更喜欢 ROOBE,因为它的焦虑和记忆负担较小,更强调解决问题的能力。缺点是考试期间用于信息搜索的时间不足,以及对未来实践准备的不确定性,因为他们在考试准备期间较少关注对事实知识的记忆。一些学生还提到了在无人监考的 ROOBE 中存在的同伴作弊和网络不稳定等问题。
教师和学生对 ROOBE 促进高阶认知技能的观点表示赞同。ROOBE 期间需要充分的技术支持。虽然需要解决与学术诚信相关的问题,但 ROOBE 可以作为评估体系中的一种真实评估方式。