Suppr超能文献

公众参与养老院研究的有效方法:系统评价与叙述性综合分析

Effective approaches to public involvement in care home research: a systematic review and narrative synthesis.

作者信息

Burgher Tanisha, Shepherd Victoria, Nollett Claire

机构信息

School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.

Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, 4Th Floor, Neuadd Meirionnydd, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4YS, UK.

出版信息

Res Involv Engagem. 2023 Jun 2;9(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00453-2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Public involvement (often referred to as patient and public involvement or PPI) integrates the voices of the public in health and care research. However, groups such as care home residents are often excluded from involvement opportunities due to the complexities of involving people with additional care and communication needs. Despite a range of approaches being used, there is little understanding about how best to incorporate their experiences, and those of other care home stakeholders, into the design and conduct of research.

OBJECTIVE

A systematic review was conducted to identify PPI methods that better meet the specific needs of care home stakeholders. This was undertaken by (1) outlining effective PPI approaches used in care home research and the key stakeholders involved; (2) describing the role of PPI in different care home contexts and (3) identifying stakeholders' experiences and attitudes towards PPI in care homes.

METHODS

Databases CINAHL, Embase, MEDLINE, PsycINFO and Scopus were searched for English language papers from inception to November 2021. A narrative synthesis approach was utilised to organise the extracted data into five themes.

RESULTS

The search initially yielded 2314 articles (following de-duplication), with 27 meeting the inclusion criteria. Articles reported a range of input from stakeholders (including residents, staff, relatives and community stakeholders), with the impact of PPI varying according to the type of care establishment and research context. The experiences and reflections of stakeholders' about their involvement in care home research varied, with some studies offering first-hand accounts compared with summaries from researchers. Some articles explicitly evaluated the effectiveness of the PPI approach using specific outcome measures whilst others indirectly described the impact of their approach. Five themes were identified as characterising an effective PPI approach: (1) valuing stakeholders' perspectives, (2) awareness of the multi-faceted research context, (3) ensuring inclusivity and transparency, (4) maintaining flexibility and adaptability and (5) utilising resources and wider support.

CONCLUSION

Effective PPI in care home research requires researchers to create person-centred opportunities to adequately involve groups with physical and cognitive impairments. The findings led to the creation of evidence-based practical recommendations to support future involvement opportunities and help researchers develop strategies for inclusive opportunities for involvement.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

The review was prospectively registered on PROPSERO (CRD42021293353).

摘要

背景

公众参与(通常称为患者及公众参与或PPI)将公众的声音纳入卫生与保健研究。然而,诸如养老院居民等群体往往因涉及有额外护理和沟通需求人群的复杂性而被排除在参与机会之外。尽管采用了一系列方法,但对于如何最好地将他们以及其他养老院利益相关者的经历纳入研究设计和实施过程,人们了解甚少。

目的

进行一项系统综述,以确定能更好满足养老院利益相关者特定需求的PPI方法。具体通过以下方式进行:(1)概述养老院研究中使用的有效PPI方法以及所涉及的关键利益相关者;(2)描述PPI在不同养老院背景下的作用;(3)确定利益相关者对养老院PPI的经历和态度。

方法

检索CINAHL、Embase、MEDLINE、PsycINFO和Scopus数据库,查找从建库至2021年11月的英文论文。采用叙述性综合方法将提取的数据组织成五个主题。

结果

检索最初得到2314篇文章(去重后),其中27篇符合纳入标准。文章报道了利益相关者(包括居民、工作人员、亲属和社区利益相关者)的一系列投入,PPI的影响因护理机构类型和研究背景而异。利益相关者对其参与养老院研究的经历和反思各不相同,一些研究提供了第一手叙述,而其他研究则是研究人员的总结。一些文章使用特定结果指标明确评估了PPI方法的有效性,而其他文章则间接描述了其方法的影响。确定了表征有效PPI方法的五个主题:(1)重视利益相关者的观点;(2)认识到多方面的研究背景;(3)确保包容性和透明度;(4)保持灵活性和适应性;(5)利用资源和更广泛的支持。

结论

养老院研究中的有效PPI要求研究人员创造以患者为中心的机会,以使身体和认知有障碍的群体充分参与。这些发现促成了基于证据的实用建议的制定,以支持未来的参与机会,并帮助研究人员制定包容性参与机会的策略。

系统综述注册

该综述已在PROSPERO(CRD42021293353)上进行前瞻性注册。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验