• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Does the Type of Chronic Heart Failure Impact In-Hospital Outcomes for Aortic Valve Replacement Procedures?慢性心力衰竭类型是否会影响主动脉瓣置换术的住院治疗结果?
Tex Heart Inst J. 2023 May 1;50(3). doi: 10.14503/THIJ-21-7775.
2
Transcatheter or surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with advanced kidney disease: A propensity score-matched analysis.晚期肾病患者的经导管或外科主动脉瓣置换术:一项倾向评分匹配分析。
Clin Cardiol. 2017 Nov;40(11):1156-1162. doi: 10.1002/clc.22806. Epub 2017 Nov 22.
3
Is Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Better Than Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease? A Nationwide Inpatient Sample Analysis.经导管主动脉瓣置换术与外科主动脉瓣置换术治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的比较:一项全国性住院患者样本分析。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2018 Apr 1;7(7):e008408. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.008408.
4
Temporal Trends and Outcomes of Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement for Bicuspid Aortic Valve Stenosis.经导管主动脉瓣置换术与外科主动脉瓣置换术治疗二叶式主动脉瓣狭窄的时间趋势和结局。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Sep 23;12(18):1811-1822. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.06.037.
5
Transcatheter and Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement Outcomes for Patients with Chronic Heart Failure.慢性心力衰竭患者行经导管主动脉瓣置换术和外科主动脉瓣置换术的结局。
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2021 Mar;35(3):888-895. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2020.06.082. Epub 2020 Jul 3.
6
The impact of mitral stenosis on outcomes of aortic valve stenosis patient undergoing surgical aortic valve replacement or transcatheter aortic valve replacement.二尖瓣狭窄对接受外科主动脉瓣置换术或经导管主动脉瓣置换术的主动脉瓣狭窄患者预后的影响。
J Interv Cardiol. 2018 Oct;31(5):655-660. doi: 10.1111/joic.12519. Epub 2018 May 17.
7
Hospital outcomes of transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in female in the United States.美国女性经导管主动脉瓣置换术与外科主动脉瓣置换术的医院治疗结果
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Mar 1;91(4):813-819. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27362. Epub 2017 Oct 9.
8
Acute kidney injury after aortic valve replacement in a nationally representative cohort in the USA.美国全国代表性队列中主动脉瓣置换术后急性肾损伤。
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2019 Feb 1;34(2):295-300. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfy097.
9
A Comparative Study of TAVR versus SAVR in Moderate and High-Risk Surgical Patients: Hospital Outcome and Midterm Results.中高危手术患者经导管主动脉瓣置换术与外科主动脉瓣置换术的比较研究:医院结局和中期结果
Heart Surg Forum. 2019 Aug 27;22(5):E331-E339. doi: 10.1532/hsf.2243.
10
In-hospital outcomes after transcatheter or surgical aortic valve replacement in younger patients less than 75 years old: a propensity-matched comparison.75 岁以下年轻患者行经导管主动脉瓣置换术或外科主动脉瓣置换术后的院内转归:倾向评分匹配比较。
EuroIntervention. 2018 May 20;14(1):50-57. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-17-01051.

本文引用的文献

1
Transcatheter and Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement Outcomes for Patients with Chronic Heart Failure.慢性心力衰竭患者行经导管主动脉瓣置换术和外科主动脉瓣置换术的结局。
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2021 Mar;35(3):888-895. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2020.06.082. Epub 2020 Jul 3.
2
Balloon-Expandable Versus Self-Expanding Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Propensity-Matched Comparison From the FRANCE-TAVI Registry.球囊扩张式与自膨式经导管主动脉瓣置换术:法国 TAVI 注册研究的倾向性匹配比较。
Circulation. 2020 Jan 28;141(4):243-259. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.043785. Epub 2019 Nov 16.
3
Expanding the indications for transcatheter aortic valve implantation.经导管主动脉瓣植入术适应证的拓展。
Nat Rev Cardiol. 2020 Feb;17(2):75-84. doi: 10.1038/s41569-019-0254-6. Epub 2019 Sep 16.
4
Transcatheter Aortic-Valve Replacement with a Balloon-Expandable Valve in Low-Risk Patients.经皮球囊扩张式主动脉瓣置换术治疗低危患者。
N Engl J Med. 2019 May 2;380(18):1695-1705. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1814052. Epub 2019 Mar 16.
5
Transcatheter Aortic-Valve Replacement with a Self-Expanding Valve in Low-Risk Patients.经导管主动脉瓣置换术治疗低危患者的自膨式瓣膜。
N Engl J Med. 2019 May 2;380(18):1706-1715. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1816885. Epub 2019 Mar 16.
6
Durability of Transcatheter and Surgical Bioprosthetic Aortic Valves in Patients at Lower Surgical Risk.低手术风险患者行经导管和外科生物瓣主动脉瓣膜的耐久性。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 Feb 12;73(5):546-553. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.10.083.
7
Acute kidney injury after transcatheter aortic valve replacement in the elderly: outcomes and risk management.老年患者经导管主动脉瓣置换术后的急性肾损伤:结局和风险管理。
Clin Interv Aging. 2019 Jan 21;14:195-201. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S149916. eCollection 2019.
8
Cost-Effectiveness of Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis at Intermediate Risk.经导管主动脉瓣置换术与外科主动脉瓣置换术治疗中危重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者的成本效果分析。
Circulation. 2019 Feb 12;139(7):877-888. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.035236.
9
Is Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Better Than Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease? A Nationwide Inpatient Sample Analysis.经导管主动脉瓣置换术与外科主动脉瓣置换术治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的比较:一项全国性住院患者样本分析。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2018 Apr 1;7(7):e008408. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.008408.
10
Transcatheter and Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With End-Stage Renal Disease.终末期肾病患者的经导管与外科主动脉瓣置换术
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Apr 11;69(14):1875-1876. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.01.049.

慢性心力衰竭类型是否会影响主动脉瓣置换术的住院治疗结果?

Does the Type of Chronic Heart Failure Impact In-Hospital Outcomes for Aortic Valve Replacement Procedures?

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas.

Advanced Cardiopulmonary Therapies and Transplantation, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas.

出版信息

Tex Heart Inst J. 2023 May 1;50(3). doi: 10.14503/THIJ-21-7775.

DOI:10.14503/THIJ-21-7775
PMID:37270296
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10353272/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study assessed in-hospital outcomes of patients with chronic systolic, diastolic, or mixed heart failure (HF) undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) or surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR).

METHODS

The Nationwide Inpatient Sample database was used to identify patients with aortic stenosis and chronic HF who underwent TAVR or SAVR between 2012 and 2015. Propensity score matching and multivariate logistic regression were used to determine outcome risk.

RESULTS

A cohort of 9,879 patients with systolic (27.2%), diastolic (52.2%), and mixed (20.6%) chronic HF were included. No statistically significant differences in hospital mortality were noted. Overall, patients with diastolic HF had the shortest hospital stays and lowest costs. Compared with patients with diastolic HF, the risk of acute myocardial infarction (TAVR odds ratio [OR], 1.95; 95% CI, 1.20-3.19; P = .008; SAVR OR, 1.38; 95% CI, 0.98-1.95; P = .067) and cardiogenic shock (TAVR OR, 2.15; 95% CI, 1.43-3.23; P < .001; SAVR OR, 1.89; 95% CI, 1.42-2.53; P ≤ .001) was higher in patients with systolic HF, whereas the risk of permanent pacemaker implantation (TAVR OR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.45-0.76; P < .001; SAVR OR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.40-0.84; P = .004) was lower following aortic valve procedures. In TAVR, the risk of acute deep vein thrombosis and kidney injury was higher, although not statistically significant, in patients with systolic HF than in those with diastolic HF.

CONCLUSION

These outcomes suggest that chronic HF types do not incur statistically significant hospital mortality risk in patients undergoing TAVR or SAVR.

摘要

背景

本研究评估了慢性收缩性、舒张性或混合性心力衰竭(HF)患者行经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)或外科主动脉瓣置换术(SAVR)的住院期间结局。

方法

利用全国住院患者样本数据库,确定了 2012 年至 2015 年间接受 TAVR 或 SAVR 的主动脉瓣狭窄合并慢性 HF 患者。采用倾向评分匹配和多变量逻辑回归来确定结局风险。

结果

纳入了 9879 例收缩性(27.2%)、舒张性(52.2%)和混合性(20.6%)慢性 HF 患者。两组患者的院内死亡率无统计学差异。总体而言,舒张性 HF 患者的住院时间最短,费用最低。与舒张性 HF 患者相比,收缩性 HF 患者发生急性心肌梗死的风险更高(TAVR 比值比 [OR],1.95;95%置信区间 [CI],1.20-3.19;P =.008;SAVR OR,1.38;95% CI,0.98-1.95;P =.067)和心源性休克(TAVR OR,2.15;95% CI,1.43-3.23;P <.001;SAVR OR,1.89;95% CI,1.42-2.53;P ≤.001),而永久性心脏起搏器植入的风险更低(TAVR OR,0.58;95% CI,0.45-0.76;P <.001;SAVR OR,0.58;95% CI,0.40-0.84;P =.004)。在 TAVR 中,尽管没有统计学意义,但收缩性 HF 患者的急性深静脉血栓形成和肾损伤风险高于舒张性 HF 患者。

结论

这些结局表明,慢性 HF 类型不会导致接受 TAVR 或 SAVR 的患者发生有统计学意义的院内死亡率风险。