Suppr超能文献

双侧基底节出血:病因、治疗策略和临床结局的系统评价。

Bilateral basal ganglia hemorrhage: a systematic review of etiologies, management strategies, and clinical outcomes.

机构信息

John A. Burns School of Medicine, University of Hawai'i, Honolulu, HI, USA.

Department of Neurosurgery, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA.

出版信息

Neurosurg Rev. 2023 Jun 5;46(1):135. doi: 10.1007/s10143-023-02044-x.

Abstract

Bilateral basal ganglia hemorrhages (BBGHs) represent rare accidents, with no clear standard of care currently defined. We reviewed the literature on BBGHs and analyzed the available conservative and surgical strategies. PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane were searched following the PRISMA guidelines to include studies reporting patients with BBGHs. Clinical characteristics, management, and outcomes were analyzed. We included 64 studies comprising 75 patients, 25 (33%) traumatic and 50 (67%) non-traumatic. Traumatic cases affected younger patients (mean age 35 vs. 46 years, p=0.014) and males (84% vs. 71%, p=0.27) and were characterized by higher proportion of normal blood pressures at admission (66% vs. 13%, p=0.0016) compared to non-traumatic cases. Most patients were comatose at admission (56%), with a mean Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score of 7 and a higher proportion of comatose patients in the traumatic than in the non-traumatic group (64% vs. 52%, p=0.28). Among the traumatic group, motor vehicle accidents and falls accounted for 79% of cases. In the non-traumatic group, hemorrhage was most associated with hypertensive or ischemic (54%) and chemical (28%) etiologies. Management was predominantly conservative (83%). Outcomes were poor in 56% of patients with mean follow-up of 8 months. Good recovery was significantly higher in the traumatic than in the non-traumatic group (48% vs. 17%, p=0.019). BBGHs are rare occurrences with dismal prognoses. Standard management follows that of current intracerebral hemorrhage guidelines with supportive care and early blood pressure management. Minimally invasive surgery is promising, though substantial evidence is required to outweigh the potentially increased risks of bilateral hematoma evacuation.

摘要

双侧基底节区脑出血(BBGHs)较为罕见,目前尚无明确的治疗标准。我们回顾了关于 BBGH 的文献,并分析了现有的保守和手术策略。我们按照 PRISMA 指南检索了 PubMed、Scopus、Web of Science 和 Cochrane 数据库,纳入了报道 BBGH 患者的研究。分析了临床特征、治疗方法和结局。我们纳入了 64 项研究,共纳入 75 例患者,25 例(33%)为创伤性,50 例(67%)为非创伤性。与非创伤性病例相比,创伤性病例的患者更年轻(平均年龄 35 岁 vs. 46 岁,p=0.014),且更常见男性(84% vs. 71%,p=0.27),入院时血压正常的比例更高(66% vs. 13%,p=0.0016)。大多数患者入院时处于昏迷状态(56%),格拉斯哥昏迷评分(GCS)平均为 7 分,且创伤性组昏迷患者的比例高于非创伤性组(64% vs. 52%,p=0.28)。在创伤性组中,机动车事故和跌倒占病例的 79%。在非创伤性组中,出血最常见的病因是高血压或缺血性(54%)和化学性(28%)。治疗主要采用保守治疗(83%)。在平均 8 个月的随访中,56%的患者预后较差。创伤性组的良好恢复率明显高于非创伤性组(48% vs. 17%,p=0.019)。BBGHs 预后较差,发病率较低。标准治疗遵循目前的脑出血指南,包括支持性治疗和早期血压管理。微创手术有一定前景,但需要更多证据来证明其优势,以抵消双侧血肿清除术可能增加的风险。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80bb/10240133/9671b106615e/10143_2023_2044_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验