Au Algae K Y, Ng Jacky C K, Wu Wesley C H, Chen Sylvia Xiaohua
The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Kowloon Hong Kong.
Humanit Soc Sci Commun. 2023;10(1):272. doi: 10.1057/s41599-023-01747-2. Epub 2023 May 30.
Based upon a mixed-methods follow-up exploratory model, we examined the link between trust and coping during the early outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic at the society level. Qualitative data were collected from the supportive messages written by 10,072 community adults across 35 societies. Trust and coping were used as the two pre-defined themes in the conceptual content analysis. Five subthemes emerged from the theme trust, depicting five distinct trusted targets: God, a larger us, country/government, science/healthcare, and the affected. Six subthemes emerged from the theme coping, depicting six distinct coping strategies: interpersonal/social coping, religious/spiritual coping, acceptance, blame, wishful thinking, and strength-based coping. A follow-up quantitative investigation also showed that four society-level factors (viz., individualism, cultural tightness, globalization, and severity of pandemic) had differential effects on people's trusted targets and ways of coping with the pandemic. Our study made both methodological and practical contributions to cross-cultural research on COVID-19 by using a mixed-methods approach in a multinational study and demonstrating the importance of making meaningful virtual connection during a time of physical distancing.
基于混合方法的后续探索性模型,我们在社会层面考察了新冠疫情早期爆发期间信任与应对之间的联系。定性数据收集自35个社会中10072名社区成年人所写的支持性信息。在概念内容分析中,信任和应对被用作两个预先定义的主题。从信任主题中出现了五个子主题,描绘了五个不同的被信任对象:上帝、更广大的“我们”、国家/政府、科学/医疗保健以及受影响者。从应对主题中出现了六个子主题,描绘了六种不同的应对策略:人际/社会应对、宗教/精神应对、接受、责备、一厢情愿以及基于力量的应对。一项后续定量调查还表明,四个社会层面的因素(即个人主义、文化紧密性、全球化和疫情严重程度)对人们的被信任对象和应对疫情的方式有不同影响。我们的研究通过在跨国研究中使用混合方法,并证明在物理距离时期建立有意义的虚拟联系的重要性,为新冠疫情的跨文化研究做出了方法和实践上的贡献。