Suppr超能文献

2019年冠状病毒病二价疫苗的有效性。

Effectiveness of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Bivalent Vaccine.

作者信息

Shrestha Nabin K, Burke Patrick C, Nowacki Amy S, Simon James F, Hagen Amanda, Gordon Steven M

机构信息

Department of Infectious Diseases, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.

Infection Prevention, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.

出版信息

Open Forum Infect Dis. 2023 Apr 19;10(6):ofad209. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofad209. eCollection 2023 Jun.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether a bivalent coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine protects against COVID-19.

METHODS

The study included employees of Cleveland Clinic in employment when the bivalent COVID-19 vaccine first became available. Cumulative incidence of COVID-19 over the following 26 weeks was examined. Protection provided by vaccination (analyzed as a time-dependent covariate) was evaluated using Cox proportional hazards regression, with change in dominant circulating lineages over time accounted for by time-dependent coefficients. The analysis was adjusted for the pandemic phase when the last prior COVID-19 episode occurred and the number of prior vaccine doses.

RESULTS

Among 51 017 employees, COVID-19 occurred in 4424 (8.7%) during the study. In multivariable analysis, the bivalent-vaccinated state was associated with lower risk of COVID-19 during the BA.4/5-dominant (hazard ratio, 0.71 [95% confidence interval, .63-79]) and the BQ-dominant (0.80 [.69-.94]) phases, but decreased risk was not found during the XBB-dominant phase (0.96 [.82-.1.12]). The estimated vaccine effectiveness was 29% (95% confidence interval, 21%-37%), 20% (6%-31%), and 4% (-12% to 18%), during the BA.4/5-, BQ-, and XBB-dominant phases, respectively. The risk of COVID-19 also increased with time since the most recent prior COVID-19 episode and with the number of vaccine doses previously received.

CONCLUSIONS

The bivalent COVID-19 vaccine given to working-aged adults afforded modest protection overall against COVID-19 while the BA.4/5 lineages were the dominant circulating strains, afforded less protection when the BQ lineages were dominant, and effectiveness was not demonstrated when the XBB lineages were dominant.

摘要

背景

本研究的目的是评估二价2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)疫苗是否能预防COVID-19。

方法

研究纳入了二价COVID-19疫苗首次可用时在克利夫兰诊所工作的员工。对接下来26周内COVID-19的累积发病率进行了检查。使用Cox比例风险回归评估疫苗接种提供的保护作用(作为时间依赖性协变量进行分析),并通过时间依赖性系数考虑随时间变化的主要流行谱系。分析针对最后一次先前COVID-19发作时的大流行阶段和先前接种疫苗的剂量进行了调整。

结果

在51017名员工中,4424人(8.7%)在研究期间发生了COVID-19。在多变量分析中,接种二价疫苗状态与在BA.4/5为主的阶段(风险比,0.71[95%置信区间,0.63 - 0.79])和BQ为主的阶段(0.80[0.69 - 0.94])COVID-19风险较低相关,但在XBB为主的阶段未发现风险降低(0.96[0.82 - 1.12])。在BA.4/5、BQ和XBB为主的阶段,估计的疫苗效力分别为29%(95%置信区间,21% - 37%)、20%(6% - 31%)和4%(-12%至18%)。自上次先前COVID-19发作以来的时间以及先前接种疫苗的剂量增加,COVID-19风险也增加。

结论

在工作年龄成年人中接种的二价COVID-19疫苗在BA.4/5谱系为主要流行毒株时总体上对COVID-19提供了适度保护,在BQ谱系为主时提供的保护较少,而在XBB谱系为主时未显示出有效性。

相似文献

1
Effectiveness of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Bivalent Vaccine.
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2023 Apr 19;10(6):ofad209. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofad209. eCollection 2023 Jun.
2
Effectiveness of the 2023-2024 Formulation of the COVID-19 Messenger RNA Vaccine.
Clin Infect Dis. 2024 Aug 16;79(2):405-411. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciae132.
3
Risk of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) among those up-to-date and not up-to-date on COVID-19 vaccination by US CDC criteria.
PLoS One. 2023 Nov 8;18(11):e0293449. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0293449. eCollection 2023.
6
Coronavirus Disease 2019 Vaccine Boosting in Previously Infected or Vaccinated Individuals.
Clin Infect Dis. 2022 Dec 19;75(12):2169-2177. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciac327.

引用本文的文献

2
Factors affecting the impact of COVID-19 vaccination on post COVID-19 conditions among adults: A systematic literature review.
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2025 Dec;21(1):2474772. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2025.2474772. Epub 2025 Mar 13.
3
All-cause mortality according to COVID-19 vaccination status: An analysis of the UK office for National statistics public data.
F1000Res. 2025 Feb 20;13:886. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.154058.2. eCollection 2024.
7
Antigenic Imprinting Dominates Humoral Responses to New Variants of SARS-CoV-2 in a Hamster Model of COVID-19.
Microorganisms. 2024 Dec 14;12(12):2591. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms12122591.
9
Is resistance to Covid-19 vaccination a "problem"? A critical policy inquiry of vaccine mandates for healthcare workers.
AIMS Public Health. 2024 Jun 12;11(3):688-714. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2024035. eCollection 2024.
10
Vaccination against rapidly evolving pathogens and the entanglements of memory.
Nat Immunol. 2024 Nov;25(11):2015-2023. doi: 10.1038/s41590-024-01970-2. Epub 2024 Oct 9.

本文引用的文献

1
2
Imprinted SARS-CoV-2 humoral immunity induces convergent Omicron RBD evolution.
Nature. 2023 Feb;614(7948):521-529. doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-05644-7. Epub 2022 Dec 19.
5
Rate of SARS-CoV-2 Reinfection During an Omicron Wave in Iceland.
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Aug 1;5(8):e2225320. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.25320.
7
Seroprevalence of Infection-Induced SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies - United States, September 2021-February 2022.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2022 Apr 29;71(17):606-608. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7117e3.
8
Coronavirus Disease 2019 Vaccine Boosting in Previously Infected or Vaccinated Individuals.
Clin Infect Dis. 2022 Dec 19;75(12):2169-2177. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciac327.
10
Protection against the Omicron Variant from Previous SARS-CoV-2 Infection.
N Engl J Med. 2022 Mar 31;386(13):1288-1290. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc2200133. Epub 2022 Feb 9.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验