Shrestha Nabin K, Burke Patrick C, Nowacki Amy S, Simon James F, Hagen Amanda, Gordon Steven M
Department of Infectious Diseases, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Infection Prevention, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2023 Apr 19;10(6):ofad209. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofad209. eCollection 2023 Jun.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether a bivalent coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine protects against COVID-19.
The study included employees of Cleveland Clinic in employment when the bivalent COVID-19 vaccine first became available. Cumulative incidence of COVID-19 over the following 26 weeks was examined. Protection provided by vaccination (analyzed as a time-dependent covariate) was evaluated using Cox proportional hazards regression, with change in dominant circulating lineages over time accounted for by time-dependent coefficients. The analysis was adjusted for the pandemic phase when the last prior COVID-19 episode occurred and the number of prior vaccine doses.
Among 51 017 employees, COVID-19 occurred in 4424 (8.7%) during the study. In multivariable analysis, the bivalent-vaccinated state was associated with lower risk of COVID-19 during the BA.4/5-dominant (hazard ratio, 0.71 [95% confidence interval, .63-79]) and the BQ-dominant (0.80 [.69-.94]) phases, but decreased risk was not found during the XBB-dominant phase (0.96 [.82-.1.12]). The estimated vaccine effectiveness was 29% (95% confidence interval, 21%-37%), 20% (6%-31%), and 4% (-12% to 18%), during the BA.4/5-, BQ-, and XBB-dominant phases, respectively. The risk of COVID-19 also increased with time since the most recent prior COVID-19 episode and with the number of vaccine doses previously received.
The bivalent COVID-19 vaccine given to working-aged adults afforded modest protection overall against COVID-19 while the BA.4/5 lineages were the dominant circulating strains, afforded less protection when the BQ lineages were dominant, and effectiveness was not demonstrated when the XBB lineages were dominant.
本研究的目的是评估二价2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)疫苗是否能预防COVID-19。
研究纳入了二价COVID-19疫苗首次可用时在克利夫兰诊所工作的员工。对接下来26周内COVID-19的累积发病率进行了检查。使用Cox比例风险回归评估疫苗接种提供的保护作用(作为时间依赖性协变量进行分析),并通过时间依赖性系数考虑随时间变化的主要流行谱系。分析针对最后一次先前COVID-19发作时的大流行阶段和先前接种疫苗的剂量进行了调整。
在51017名员工中,4424人(8.7%)在研究期间发生了COVID-19。在多变量分析中,接种二价疫苗状态与在BA.4/5为主的阶段(风险比,0.71[95%置信区间,0.63 - 0.79])和BQ为主的阶段(0.80[0.69 - 0.94])COVID-19风险较低相关,但在XBB为主的阶段未发现风险降低(0.96[0.82 - 1.12])。在BA.4/5、BQ和XBB为主的阶段,估计的疫苗效力分别为29%(95%置信区间,21% - 37%)、20%(6% - 31%)和4%(-12%至18%)。自上次先前COVID-19发作以来的时间以及先前接种疫苗的剂量增加,COVID-19风险也增加。
在工作年龄成年人中接种的二价COVID-19疫苗在BA.4/5谱系为主要流行毒株时总体上对COVID-19提供了适度保护,在BQ谱系为主时提供的保护较少,而在XBB谱系为主时未显示出有效性。