Suppr超能文献

2019年冠状病毒病二价疫苗的有效性。

Effectiveness of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Bivalent Vaccine.

作者信息

Shrestha Nabin K, Burke Patrick C, Nowacki Amy S, Simon James F, Hagen Amanda, Gordon Steven M

机构信息

Department of Infectious Diseases, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.

Infection Prevention, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.

出版信息

Open Forum Infect Dis. 2023 Apr 19;10(6):ofad209. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofad209. eCollection 2023 Jun.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether a bivalent coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine protects against COVID-19.

METHODS

The study included employees of Cleveland Clinic in employment when the bivalent COVID-19 vaccine first became available. Cumulative incidence of COVID-19 over the following 26 weeks was examined. Protection provided by vaccination (analyzed as a time-dependent covariate) was evaluated using Cox proportional hazards regression, with change in dominant circulating lineages over time accounted for by time-dependent coefficients. The analysis was adjusted for the pandemic phase when the last prior COVID-19 episode occurred and the number of prior vaccine doses.

RESULTS

Among 51 017 employees, COVID-19 occurred in 4424 (8.7%) during the study. In multivariable analysis, the bivalent-vaccinated state was associated with lower risk of COVID-19 during the BA.4/5-dominant (hazard ratio, 0.71 [95% confidence interval, .63-79]) and the BQ-dominant (0.80 [.69-.94]) phases, but decreased risk was not found during the XBB-dominant phase (0.96 [.82-.1.12]). The estimated vaccine effectiveness was 29% (95% confidence interval, 21%-37%), 20% (6%-31%), and 4% (-12% to 18%), during the BA.4/5-, BQ-, and XBB-dominant phases, respectively. The risk of COVID-19 also increased with time since the most recent prior COVID-19 episode and with the number of vaccine doses previously received.

CONCLUSIONS

The bivalent COVID-19 vaccine given to working-aged adults afforded modest protection overall against COVID-19 while the BA.4/5 lineages were the dominant circulating strains, afforded less protection when the BQ lineages were dominant, and effectiveness was not demonstrated when the XBB lineages were dominant.

摘要

背景

本研究的目的是评估二价2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)疫苗是否能预防COVID-19。

方法

研究纳入了二价COVID-19疫苗首次可用时在克利夫兰诊所工作的员工。对接下来26周内COVID-19的累积发病率进行了检查。使用Cox比例风险回归评估疫苗接种提供的保护作用(作为时间依赖性协变量进行分析),并通过时间依赖性系数考虑随时间变化的主要流行谱系。分析针对最后一次先前COVID-19发作时的大流行阶段和先前接种疫苗的剂量进行了调整。

结果

在51017名员工中,4424人(8.7%)在研究期间发生了COVID-19。在多变量分析中,接种二价疫苗状态与在BA.4/5为主的阶段(风险比,0.71[95%置信区间,0.63 - 0.79])和BQ为主的阶段(0.80[0.69 - 0.94])COVID-19风险较低相关,但在XBB为主的阶段未发现风险降低(0.96[0.82 - 1.12])。在BA.4/5、BQ和XBB为主的阶段,估计的疫苗效力分别为29%(95%置信区间,21% - 37%)、20%(6% - 31%)和4%(-12%至18%)。自上次先前COVID-19发作以来的时间以及先前接种疫苗的剂量增加,COVID-19风险也增加。

结论

在工作年龄成年人中接种的二价COVID-19疫苗在BA.4/5谱系为主要流行毒株时总体上对COVID-19提供了适度保护,在BQ谱系为主时提供的保护较少,而在XBB谱系为主时未显示出有效性。

相似文献

1
Effectiveness of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Bivalent Vaccine.2019年冠状病毒病二价疫苗的有效性。
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2023 Apr 19;10(6):ofad209. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofad209. eCollection 2023 Jun.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

5
Rate of SARS-CoV-2 Reinfection During an Omicron Wave in Iceland.冰岛奥密克戎波期间 SARS-CoV-2 再感染率。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Aug 1;5(8):e2225320. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.25320.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验