Orthopaedic Biomechanics Laboratory, Congress Medical Foundation, Pasadena, CA, USA.
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Takatsuki, Osaka, Japan.
Clin Orthop Surg. 2023 Jun;15(3):508-515. doi: 10.4055/cios22134. Epub 2023 Mar 27.
The purpose of this study was to quantify and compare the biomechanical characteristics of a new locking loop stitch (LLS), developed utilizing the concepts of both running locking stitch and needleless stitch, to the traditional Krackow stitch.
The Krackow stitch with No.2 braided suture and the LLS with 1.3-mm augmented polyblend suture tape were compared biomechanically. The LLS was performed with single strand locking loops and wrapping suture around the tendon, resulting in half the needle penetrations through the graft compared to the Krackow stitch. Twenty bovine extensor tendons were divided randomly into two groups. The tendons were prepared to match equal thickness and cross-sectional area. Each suture-tendon was stitched and preloaded to 5 N for 60 seconds, cyclically loaded to 20 N, 40 N, and 60 N for 10 cycles each, and then loaded to failure. The deformation of the suture-tendon construct, stiffness, yield load, and ultimate load were measured.
The LLS had significantly less deformation of the suture-tendon construct at 100 N, 200 N, 300 N, and at ultimate load compared to the Krackow stitch (Krackow stitch and LLS at 100 N: 1.3 ± 0.1 mm and 1.0 ± 0.2 mm, < 0.001; 200 N: 3.0 ± 0.3 mm and 1.9 ± 0.2 mm, < 0.001; 300 N: 5.1 ± 0.6 mm and 2.9 ± 0.4 mm, < 0.001; ultimate load: 12.8 ± 2.8 mm and 5.0 ± 1.2 mm, < 0.001). The LLS had significantly greater stiffness (Krackow stitch and LLS: 97.5 ± 6.9 N/mm and 117.2 ± 13.9 N/mm, < 0.001) and yield load (Krackow stitch and LLS: 66.2 ± 15.9 N and 237.9 ± 93.6 N, < 0.001) compared to the Krackow stitch. There was no significant difference in ultimate load (Krackow stitch: 450.2 ± 49.4 N; LLS: 472.6 ± 59.8 N; = 0.290).
The LLS had significantly smaller deformation of the suture-tendon construct compared to the Krackow stitch. The LLS may be a viable surgical alternative to the Krackow stitch for graft fixation when secure fixation is necessary.
本研究旨在定量比较新型锁环缝线(LLS)与传统克氏缝合的生物力学特性,该缝线结合了连续锁边缝合和无针缝合的理念。
对比了 2 号编织缝线的克氏缝合和 1.3mm 增强型多线缝合带的 LLS。LLS 采用单股锁边环和缝线缠绕肌腱,与克氏缝合相比,穿过移植物的针数减少一半。20 个牛伸肌腱随机分为两组。肌腱准备匹配相等的厚度和横截面积。每个缝线-肌腱缝合后预加载 5N 持续 60 秒,循环加载 20N、40N 和 60N 各 10 个循环,然后加载至失效。测量缝线-肌腱结构的变形、刚度、屈服载荷和极限载荷。
与克氏缝合相比,LLS 在 100N、200N、300N 和极限载荷时缝线-肌腱结构的变形明显更小(克氏缝合和 LLS 在 100N 时:1.3±0.1mm 和 1.0±0.2mm,<0.001;200N 时:3.0±0.3mm 和 1.9±0.2mm,<0.001;300N 时:5.1±0.6mm 和 2.9±0.4mm,<0.001;极限载荷时:12.8±2.8mm 和 5.0±1.2mm,<0.001)。LLS 的刚度(克氏缝合和 LLS:97.5±6.9N/mm 和 117.2±13.9N/mm,<0.001)和屈服载荷(克氏缝合和 LLS:66.2±15.9N 和 237.9±93.6N,<0.001)明显大于克氏缝合。极限载荷无显著差异(克氏缝合:450.2±49.4N;LLS:472.6±59.8N;=0.290)。
与克氏缝合相比,LLS 缝线-肌腱结构的变形明显更小。当需要牢固固定时,LLS 可能是克氏缝合的一种可行的替代方法,用于移植物固定。