Suppr超能文献

新型锁定环缝线固定移植物的生物力学特性与 Krackow 缝线比较。

Biomechanical Characterization of a New Locking Loop Stitch for Graft Fixation versus Krackow Stitch.

机构信息

Orthopaedic Biomechanics Laboratory, Congress Medical Foundation, Pasadena, CA, USA.

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Takatsuki, Osaka, Japan.

出版信息

Clin Orthop Surg. 2023 Jun;15(3):508-515. doi: 10.4055/cios22134. Epub 2023 Mar 27.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to quantify and compare the biomechanical characteristics of a new locking loop stitch (LLS), developed utilizing the concepts of both running locking stitch and needleless stitch, to the traditional Krackow stitch.

METHODS

The Krackow stitch with No.2 braided suture and the LLS with 1.3-mm augmented polyblend suture tape were compared biomechanically. The LLS was performed with single strand locking loops and wrapping suture around the tendon, resulting in half the needle penetrations through the graft compared to the Krackow stitch. Twenty bovine extensor tendons were divided randomly into two groups. The tendons were prepared to match equal thickness and cross-sectional area. Each suture-tendon was stitched and preloaded to 5 N for 60 seconds, cyclically loaded to 20 N, 40 N, and 60 N for 10 cycles each, and then loaded to failure. The deformation of the suture-tendon construct, stiffness, yield load, and ultimate load were measured.

RESULTS

The LLS had significantly less deformation of the suture-tendon construct at 100 N, 200 N, 300 N, and at ultimate load compared to the Krackow stitch (Krackow stitch and LLS at 100 N: 1.3 ± 0.1 mm and 1.0 ± 0.2 mm, < 0.001; 200 N: 3.0 ± 0.3 mm and 1.9 ± 0.2 mm, < 0.001; 300 N: 5.1 ± 0.6 mm and 2.9 ± 0.4 mm, < 0.001; ultimate load: 12.8 ± 2.8 mm and 5.0 ± 1.2 mm, < 0.001). The LLS had significantly greater stiffness (Krackow stitch and LLS: 97.5 ± 6.9 N/mm and 117.2 ± 13.9 N/mm, < 0.001) and yield load (Krackow stitch and LLS: 66.2 ± 15.9 N and 237.9 ± 93.6 N, < 0.001) compared to the Krackow stitch. There was no significant difference in ultimate load (Krackow stitch: 450.2 ± 49.4 N; LLS: 472.6 ± 59.8 N; = 0.290).

CONCLUSIONS

The LLS had significantly smaller deformation of the suture-tendon construct compared to the Krackow stitch. The LLS may be a viable surgical alternative to the Krackow stitch for graft fixation when secure fixation is necessary.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在定量比较新型锁环缝线(LLS)与传统克氏缝合的生物力学特性,该缝线结合了连续锁边缝合和无针缝合的理念。

方法

对比了 2 号编织缝线的克氏缝合和 1.3mm 增强型多线缝合带的 LLS。LLS 采用单股锁边环和缝线缠绕肌腱,与克氏缝合相比,穿过移植物的针数减少一半。20 个牛伸肌腱随机分为两组。肌腱准备匹配相等的厚度和横截面积。每个缝线-肌腱缝合后预加载 5N 持续 60 秒,循环加载 20N、40N 和 60N 各 10 个循环,然后加载至失效。测量缝线-肌腱结构的变形、刚度、屈服载荷和极限载荷。

结果

与克氏缝合相比,LLS 在 100N、200N、300N 和极限载荷时缝线-肌腱结构的变形明显更小(克氏缝合和 LLS 在 100N 时:1.3±0.1mm 和 1.0±0.2mm,<0.001;200N 时:3.0±0.3mm 和 1.9±0.2mm,<0.001;300N 时:5.1±0.6mm 和 2.9±0.4mm,<0.001;极限载荷时:12.8±2.8mm 和 5.0±1.2mm,<0.001)。LLS 的刚度(克氏缝合和 LLS:97.5±6.9N/mm 和 117.2±13.9N/mm,<0.001)和屈服载荷(克氏缝合和 LLS:66.2±15.9N 和 237.9±93.6N,<0.001)明显大于克氏缝合。极限载荷无显著差异(克氏缝合:450.2±49.4N;LLS:472.6±59.8N;=0.290)。

结论

与克氏缝合相比,LLS 缝线-肌腱结构的变形明显更小。当需要牢固固定时,LLS 可能是克氏缝合的一种可行的替代方法,用于移植物固定。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/036b/10232308/3f758a3830ab/cios-15-508-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验