Kaur Ramandeep, Garg Rohit, Raj Rajnish
Department of Psychiatry, Government Medical College and Rajindra Hospital, Patiala, Punjab, India.
Ind Psychiatry J. 2023 Jan-Jun;32(1):130-135. doi: 10.4103/ipj.ipj_22_22. Epub 2023 Feb 17.
No Indian studies have evaluated the impact of stigma, severity, and insight on the quality of life in obsessive compulsive disorder.
A hospital-based, cross-sectional, descriptive study on 100 patients of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) as per Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition, was conducted. Data were collected using socio-demographic performa, Yale-Brown obsessive-compulsive scale (Y-BOCS), WHOQoL-Bref hindi, hindi stigma scale, and Brown Assessment of Beliefs Scale (BABS) from March to June 2021. Appropriate statistical analyses were used.
A majority of patients were males (58%), married (65%), above matric pass (89%), and belonged to rural areas (62%). The total stigma score showed a significant negative correlation with overall QoL ( < 0.01**), overall health ( < 0.002**), satisfaction with physical health ( 0.006**), psychological health ( < 0.01**), and social relations ( < 0.01**) on WHOQoL-Bref. Discrimination, disclosure, and positive aspect domains of the stigma scale also showed a significant negative correlation with many domains of QoL. Severity of illness showed a significant negative correlation with overall QoL ( 0.045*), satisfaction with physical health ( < 0.01**), psychological health ( 0.01**), social relations ( 0.004**), and environment ( 0.007**). Poorer insight on BABS was associated with poorer overall health ( 0.04*), satisfaction with physical health ( 0.001**), social relations ( 0.03**), and environment ( 0.009**). Stigma was significantly increased by higher severity of obsessions ( 0.04*), compulsions ( 0.007**), and total Y-BOCS score ( 0.007**).
Stigma and severity of OCD have a significant negative impact on quality of life. Stigma reduction and appropriate management of severity should be an integral part of management for patients with OCD.
尚无印度的研究评估污名、严重程度和自知力对强迫症患者生活质量的影响。
根据《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版,对100例强迫症患者进行了一项基于医院的横断面描述性研究。于2021年3月至6月期间,使用社会人口学表格、耶鲁-布朗强迫症量表(Y-BOCS)、世界卫生组织生活质量简表印地语版、印地语污名量表以及信念评估布朗量表(BABS)收集数据。采用了适当的统计分析方法。
大多数患者为男性(58%),已婚(65%),高中毕业以上学历(89%),且来自农村地区(62%)。污名总分与世界卫生组织生活质量简表中的总体生活质量(<0.01**)、总体健康状况(<0.002**)、对身体健康的满意度(0.006**)、心理健康状况(<0.01**)以及社会关系(<0.01**)均呈显著负相关。污名量表中的歧视、披露和积极方面领域也与生活质量的多个领域呈显著负相关。疾病严重程度与总体生活质量(0.045*)、对身体健康的满意度(<0.01**)、心理健康状况(0.01**)、社会关系(0.004**)以及环境(0.007**)呈显著负相关。信念评估布朗量表中较差的自知力与较差的总体健康状况(0.04*)、对身体健康的满意度(0.001**)、社会关系(0.03**)以及环境(0.009**)相关。强迫观念的较高严重程度(0.04*)、强迫行为(0.007**)以及耶鲁-布朗强迫症量表总分(0.007**)会使污名显著增加。
强迫症的污名和严重程度对生活质量有显著负面影响。减少污名和适当控制严重程度应成为强迫症患者管理的一个组成部分。