Suppr超能文献

评估替代加热油的微生物污染情况。

Evaluating microbial contaminations of alternative heating oils.

作者信息

Surger Maximilian J, Mayer Katharina, Shivaram Karthik, Stibany Felix, Plum Wilfried, Schäffer Andreas, Eiden Simon, Blank Lars M

机构信息

Institute of Applied Microbiology (iAMB) Aachen Biology and Biotechnology (ABBt) RWTH Aachen University Aachen Germany.

Institute for Environmental Research RWTH Aachen University Aachen Germany.

出版信息

Eng Life Sci. 2023 May 5;23(6):e2300010. doi: 10.1002/elsc.202300010. eCollection 2023 Jun.

Abstract

Since 2008, European and German legislative initiatives for climate protection and reduced dependency on fossil resources led to the introduction of biofuels as CO-reduced alternatives in the heating oil sector. In the case of biodiesel, customers were confronted with accelerated microbial contaminations during storage. Since then, other fuel alternatives, like hydrogenated vegetable oils (HVOs), gas-to-liquid (GtL) products, or oxymethylene ether (OME) have been developed. In this study, we use online monitoring of microbial CO production and the simulation of onset of microbial contamination to investigate the contamination potential of fuel alternatives during storage. As references, fossil heating oil of German refineries are used. Biodiesel blends with fossil heating oils confirmed the promotion of microbial activity. In stark contrast, OMEs have an antimicrobial effect. The paraffinic Fischer-Tropsch products and biogenic hydrogenation products demonstrate to be at least as resistant to microbial contamination as fossil heating oils despite allowing a diversity of representative microbes. Through mass spectrometry, elemental analysis, and microbial sequencing, we can discuss fuel properties that affect microbial contaminations. In summary, novel, non-fossil heating oils show clear differences in microbial resistance during long-term storage. Designing blends with an intrinsic resistance against microbial contamination and hence reduced activity might be an option.

摘要

自2008年以来,欧洲和德国在气候保护以及减少对化石资源依赖方面的立法举措促使生物燃料作为减少碳排放的替代品被引入取暖油领域。就生物柴油而言,客户在储存过程中面临微生物污染加速的问题。从那时起,其他燃料替代品,如氢化植物油(HVO)、气制液(GtL)产品或聚甲氧基二甲醚(OME)相继被开发出来。在本研究中,我们通过在线监测微生物二氧化碳的产生以及模拟微生物污染的起始情况,来研究燃料替代品在储存过程中的污染可能性。作为参考,我们使用了德国炼油厂的化石取暖油。生物柴油与化石取暖油的混合物证实了其对微生物活性的促进作用。与之形成鲜明对比的是,聚甲氧基二甲醚具有抗菌作用。尽管允许多种代表性微生物存在,但石蜡基费托产品和生物源氢化产品对微生物污染的抵抗力至少与化石取暖油相当。通过质谱分析、元素分析和微生物测序,我们可以探讨影响微生物污染的燃料特性。总之,新型非化石取暖油在长期储存过程中对微生物的抵抗力表现出明显差异。设计具有内在抗微生物污染能力从而降低活性的混合物可能是一种选择。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a09f/10235886/8dae7a416fdc/ELSC-23-e2300010-g006.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验