Rapisarda Filippo, Bergeron Nicolas, Dufour Marie-Michèle, Guay Stéphane, Geoffrion Steve
Research Centre, Institut universitaire en sant9́ mentale de Montréal (IUSMM), Montreal, QC, Canada.
Département de psychiatrie et d'addictologie, Faculté de Médecine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Front Psychiatry. 2023 May 18;14:1112184. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1112184. eCollection 2023.
Previous research has demonstrated the negative impact of the COVID-19 pandemic emergency on the wellbeing of healthcare workers. However, few research contributions reported a longitudinal evaluation of psychological distress and examined determinants of its duration and course over time. The present study aims to explore the impact of the pandemic emergency on HCWs mental health by adopting a longitudinal design and assessing mental health as combination of overlapping clinical symptoms (post-traumatic stress disorder, depression and anxiety).
Data were collected weekly through a mobile application during and after the first wave of COVID-19 in the province of Quebec, Canada, in 2020. Analysis was conducted on a final sample of 382 participants. Participants were grouped into "resilient" (RES) if they did not manifest clinical-level psychological distress during monitoring, "short-term distress" (STD) if distress exceeded the clinical threshold for 1-3 weeks, and longer-term distress (LTD) if it occurred for four or more weeks, even if not consecutively. Descriptive statistics for all variables were computed for each subgroup (RES, STD and LTD), and pairwise comparisons between each group for every descriptive variable were made using chi square statistics for categorical variables and t-test for continuous variables. Predictors of distress groups (STD and LTD vs RES) were assessed running multinomial hierarchical logistic regression models.
In our sample, almost two third (59.4%) HCWs did not manifest moderate or severe distress during the monitoring time. Short-term distress, mostly post-traumatic symptoms that lasted for less than 4 weeks, were the most common distress response, affecting almost one third of participants. Longer psychological distress occurred only in a smaller percentage (12.6%) of cases, as a combination of severe posttraumatic, depressive and anxiety symptoms. Perceived occupational stress was the most significant risk factor; moreover individual, peritraumatic work and family risk and protective factors, were likely to significantly affect the stress response.
Results tend to provide a more complex and resiliency-oriented representation of psychological distress compared to previous cross-sectional studies, but are in line with stress response studies. Findings allow us to better describe the profiles of distress response in STD and LTD groups. Participants that manifest short term distress experience acute stress reaction in which the interplay between personal, family and professional life events is associated with the stress response. Conversely, longer term distress response in HCWs presents a more complex mental health condition with an higher level of impairment and support needs compared to participants with short-term distress.
先前的研究已经证明了新冠疫情紧急情况对医护人员福祉的负面影响。然而,很少有研究报告对心理困扰进行纵向评估并考察其持续时间和随时间变化的决定因素。本研究旨在通过采用纵向设计并将心理健康评估为重叠临床症状(创伤后应激障碍、抑郁和焦虑)的组合,来探讨疫情紧急情况对医护人员心理健康的影响。
2020年在加拿大魁北克省第一波新冠疫情期间及之后,通过移动应用程序每周收集数据。对382名参与者的最终样本进行分析。如果参与者在监测期间未表现出临床水平的心理困扰,则将其分组为“有复原力”(RES)组;如果困扰超过临床阈值1至3周,则为“短期困扰”(STD)组;如果困扰持续四周或更长时间(即使不是连续的),则为“长期困扰”(LTD)组。对每个亚组(RES、STD和LTD)的所有变量进行描述性统计,并使用分类变量的卡方统计和连续变量的t检验对每个描述性变量的每组之间进行两两比较。通过运行多项分层逻辑回归模型评估困扰组(STD和LTD与RES)的预测因素。
在我们的样本中,近三分之二(59.4%)的医护人员在监测期间未表现出中度或重度困扰。短期困扰,主要是持续不到4周的创伤后症状,是最常见的困扰反应,影响了近三分之一的参与者。较长时间的心理困扰仅在较小比例(12.6%)的病例中出现,表现为严重的创伤后、抑郁和焦虑症状的组合。感知到的职业压力是最显著的风险因素;此外,个人、创伤周围工作和家庭风险及保护因素,可能会显著影响应激反应。
与先前的横断面研究相比,结果倾向于提供一个更复杂且以复原力为导向的心理困扰表征,但与应激反应研究一致。研究结果使我们能够更好地描述STD组和LTD组的困扰反应特征。表现出短期困扰的参与者经历急性应激反应,其中个人、家庭和职业生活事件之间的相互作用与应激反应相关。相反,医护人员的长期困扰反应呈现出更复杂的心理健康状况,与短期困扰的参与者相比,其受损程度更高且支持需求更大。