Suppr超能文献

社交焦虑障碍和广泛性焦虑障碍患者在情绪识别及心理理论任务中的表现:一项系统综述与荟萃分析

Performance in emotion recognition and theory of mind tasks in social anxiety and generalized anxiety disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Baez Sandra, Tangarife María Alejandra, Davila-Mejia Gabriela, Trujillo-Güiza Martha, Forero Diego A

机构信息

Universidad de los Andes, Bogotá, Colombia.

Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Antonio Nariño, Bogotá, Colombia.

出版信息

Front Psychiatry. 2023 May 19;14:1192683. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1192683. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

Social cognition impairments may be associated with poor functional outcomes, symptoms, and disability in social anxiety disorder (SAD) and generalized anxiety disorder (GAD). This meta-analysis aims to determine if emotion recognition and theory of mind (ToM) are impaired in SAD or GAD compared to healthy controls. A systematic review was conducted in electronic databases (PubMed, PsycNet, and Web of Science) to retrieve studies assessing emotion recognition and/or ToM in patients with SAD or GAD, compared to healthy controls, up to March 2022. Meta-analyses using random-effects models were conducted. We identified 21 eligible studies: 13 reported emotion recognition and 10 ToM outcomes, with 585 SAD patients, 178 GAD patients, and 753 controls. Compared to controls, patients with SAD exhibited impairments in emotion recognition (SMD = -0.32, CI = -0.47 - -0.16, = -3.97, < 0.0001) and ToM (SMD = -0.44, CI = -0.83 -0.04, = -2.18, < 0.01). Results for GAD were inconclusive due to the limited number of studies meeting the inclusion criteria (two for each domain). Relevant demographic and clinical variables (age, sex, education level, and anxiety scores) were not significantly correlated with emotion recognition or ToM impairments in SAD and GAD. Further studies employing ecological measures with larger and homogenous samples are needed to better delineate the factors influencing social cognition outcomes in both SAD and GAD.

摘要

社交认知障碍可能与社交焦虑障碍(SAD)和广泛性焦虑障碍(GAD)的不良功能结局、症状及残疾状况相关。本荟萃分析旨在确定与健康对照相比,SAD或GAD患者在情绪识别和心理理论(ToM)方面是否受损。在电子数据库(PubMed、PsycNet和Web of Science)中进行了系统综述,以检索截至2022年3月评估SAD或GAD患者与健康对照相比的情绪识别和/或ToM的研究。采用随机效应模型进行荟萃分析。我们确定了21项符合条件的研究:13项报告了情绪识别结果,10项报告了ToM结果,涉及585例SAD患者、178例GAD患者和753例对照。与对照组相比,SAD患者在情绪识别方面存在障碍(标准化均数差[SMD]= -0.32,可信区间[CI]= -0.47至-0.16,Z = -3.97,P < 0.0001),在ToM方面也存在障碍(SMD = -0.44,CI = -0.83至-0.04,Z = -2.18,P < 0.01)。由于符合纳入标准的研究数量有限(每个领域各两项),GAD的结果尚无定论。相关的人口统计学和临床变量(年龄、性别、教育水平和焦虑评分)与SAD和GAD患者的情绪识别或ToM障碍无显著相关性。需要进一步开展采用生态学测量方法、样本量更大且同质的研究,以更好地描绘影响SAD和GAD社交认知结局的因素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc4e/10235477/2ee94a0ba554/fpsyt-14-1192683-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验