School of Civil and Transportation Engineering, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou, 510006, Guangdong, China.
State Key Laboratory of Urban Water Resource and Environment, School of Environment, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin, 150090, China.
Environ Res. 2023 Sep 1;232:116253. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2023.116253. Epub 2023 Jun 3.
In this study, the relative residual UV absorbance (UV) and/or electron donating capacity (EDC) was investigated as a surrogate parameter to evaluate the abatement of micropollutants during the Fe(II)/PMS and Mn(II)/NTA/PMS processes. In the Fe(II)/PMS process, due to the generation of SO and •OH at acidic pH, UV and EDC abatement was greater at pH 5. In the Mn(II)/NTA/PMS process, UV abatement was greater at pH 7 and 9, while EDC abatement was greater at pH 5 and 7. This was attributed to the fact that MnO was formed at alkaline pH to remove UV by coagulation, and manganese intermediates (Mn(V)) were formed at acidic pH to remove EDC via electron transfer. Due to the strong oxidation capacity of SO, •OH and Mn(V), the abatement of micropollutants increased with increasing dosages of oxidant in different waters in both processes. In the Fe(II)/PMS and Mn(II)/NTA/PMS processes, except for nitrobenzene (∼23% and 40%, respectively), the removal of other micropollutants was greater than 70% when the oxidant dosages were greater in different waters. The linear relationship between the relative residual UV, EDC and the removal of micropollutants was established in different waters, showing a one-phase or two-phase linear relationship. The differences of the slopes for one-phase linear correlation in the Fe(II)/PMS process (micropollutant-UV: 0.36-2.89, micropollutant-EDC: 0.26-1.75) were less than that in the Mn(II)/NTA/PMS process (micropollutant-UV: 0.40-13.16, micropollutant-EDC: 0.51-8.39). Overall, these results suggest that the relative residual UV and EDC could truly reflect the removal of micropollutants during the Fe(II)/PMS and Mn(II)/NTA/PMS processes.
在这项研究中,相对剩余紫外吸光度(UV)和/或电子供体能力(EDC)被用作评价 Fe(II)/PMS 和 Mn(II)/NTA/PMS 过程中去除微量污染物的替代参数。在 Fe(II)/PMS 过程中,由于在酸性 pH 下生成 SO 和 •OH,因此在 pH 5 时,UV 和 EDC 的去除率更高。在 Mn(II)/NTA/PMS 过程中,在 pH 7 和 9 时,UV 的去除率更高,而在 pH 5 和 7 时,EDC 的去除率更高。这是因为在碱性 pH 下形成了 MnO 以通过混凝去除 UV,而在酸性 pH 下形成了锰中间体(Mn(V))以通过电子转移去除 EDC。由于 SO、•OH 和 Mn(V) 的强氧化能力,在两种过程中,随着氧化剂剂量的增加,不同水中微量污染物的去除率也随之增加。在 Fe(II)/PMS 和 Mn(II)/NTA/PMS 过程中,除了硝基苯(分别约为 23%和 40%)之外,当不同水中的氧化剂剂量增加时,其他微量污染物的去除率均大于 70%。在不同水中建立了相对剩余 UV、EDC 与微量污染物去除率之间的线性关系,表现出单相或两相线性关系。Fe(II)/PMS 过程中单相线性相关的斜率差异较小(微量污染物-UV:0.36-2.89,微量污染物-EDC:0.26-1.75),而 Mn(II)/NTA/PMS 过程中差异较大(微量污染物-UV:0.40-13.16,微量污染物-EDC:0.51-8.39)。总体而言,这些结果表明,相对剩余 UV 和 EDC 可以真实反映 Fe(II)/PMS 和 Mn(II)/NTA/PMS 过程中微量污染物的去除情况。