Suppr超能文献

国家人群髋关节残疾和骨关节炎结局评分(HOOS)参考数据。

National population-based reference data for the Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS).

机构信息

Department of Occupational Therapy and Physiotherapy, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg University, 18-22 Hobrovej, 9000, Aalborg, Denmark.

出版信息

Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023 Nov;143(11):6865-6874. doi: 10.1007/s00402-023-04915-w. Epub 2023 Jun 6.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Interpretation of patient-reported outcome scores such as the Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS) can be improved with use of reference values. The aim of the study was to establish population-based reference values for the HOOS' five subscales and its short-form HOOS-12.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A representative sample of 9997 Danish citizens 18 years and older were identified. The population record-based sample was based on seven predefined age groups and an equal sex distribution within each age group. A national secure electronic system was used to send the HOOS questionnaire and one supplementary question regarding previous hip complaints to all participants.

RESULTS

2277 participants completed the HOOS, 947 women (42%) and 1330 men (58%). The mean HOOS subscale scores were: pain 86.9 (95% CI 86.1-87.7), symptoms 83.7 (95% CI 82.9-84.5), ADL 88.2 (95% CI 87.5-89.0), sport and recreation function 83.1 (95% CI 82.0-84.1), QOL 82.7 (95% CI 81.8-83.6). The youngest age group reported better mean scores in four subscales compared to the oldest age group (pain 91.7 vs. 84.5, mean difference 7.2 95% CI 0.4-14.0), (ADL 94.6 points vs. 83.2, mean difference 11.4 95% CI 4.9-17.8), (sport and recreation function 91.5 points vs. 73.8 points, mean difference 17.7 95% CI 9.0-26.4), (QOL 88.9 points vs. 78.8, mean difference 10.1 points 95% CI 2.0-18.2). Participants with a self-reported hip complaint had worse HOOS scores across all subscales (mean difference range 22.1-34.6). Super obese patients (BMI > 40) had > 12.5 points worse scores across the five HOOS subscales. Results were similar for the HOOS-12.

CONCLUSION

This study provides reference values for the HOOS and its short form HOOS-12. Results show that older patients and patients with a BMI over 40 have worse HOOS and HOOS-12 scores that may be of clinical importance in the interpretation of scores both when evaluating potential for improvement and post-treatment results.

摘要

简介

通过使用参考值,可以提高对患者报告的结果评分(如髋关节残疾和骨关节炎结果评分(HOOS))的解释。本研究的目的是建立 HOOS 五个分量表及其简化版 HOOS-12 的基于人群的参考值。

材料和方法

确定了 9997 名丹麦 18 岁及以上的代表性样本。基于七个预定义的年龄组和每个年龄组内相等的性别分布,从人口记录中抽取样本。使用国家安全电子系统向所有参与者发送 HOOS 问卷和一个关于先前髋关节问题的补充问题。

结果

2277 名参与者完成了 HOOS 调查,其中 947 名女性(42%)和 1330 名男性(58%)。HOOS 分量表的平均评分分别为:疼痛 86.9(95%CI 86.1-87.7)、症状 83.7(95%CI 82.9-84.5)、ADL 88.2(95%CI 87.5-89.0)、运动和娱乐功能 83.1(95%CI 82.0-84.1)、生活质量 82.7(95%CI 81.8-83.6)。最年轻的年龄组在四个分量表中的平均评分均高于最年长的年龄组(疼痛 91.7 比 84.5,平均差异 7.2 95%CI 0.4-14.0)、(ADL 94.6 分比 83.2 分,平均差异 11.4 95%CI 4.9-17.8)、(运动和娱乐功能 91.5 分比 73.8 分,平均差异 17.7 95%CI 9.0-26.4)、(生活质量 88.9 分比 78.8 分,平均差异 10.1 分 95%CI 2.0-18.2)。自我报告髋关节问题的参与者在所有分量表上的 HOOS 评分均较差(平均差异范围 22.1-34.6)。超级肥胖患者(BMI>40)在五个 HOOS 分量表上的得分差了超过 12.5 分。HOOS-12 的结果相似。

结论

本研究为 HOOS 及其简化版 HOOS-12 提供了参考值。结果表明,年龄较大的患者和 BMI 超过 40 的患者的 HOOS 和 HOOS-12 评分较差,这在解释评分时可能具有临床意义,无论是在评估潜在改善还是治疗后结果时。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b155/10542294/2ad952220f27/402_2023_4915_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验