Division of Infectious Diseases and Hospital Epidemiology, Departments of Medicine and Clinical Research, University Hospital Basel, Petersgraben 4, 4031, Basel, Switzerland.
Faculty of Medicine, University of Basel, 4031, Basel, Switzerland.
Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet. 2023 Jul;48(4):353-362. doi: 10.1007/s13318-023-00833-9. Epub 2023 Jun 6.
People living with HIV may present co-morbidities requiring the initiation and subsequently the discontinuation of medications with inducing properties. The time to reach maximal enzyme induction and to return to baseline enzyme levels has not been thoroughly characterized.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the onset and disappearance of dolutegravir [uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferase (UGT) 1A1 and cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 substrate] and raltegravir (UGT1A1 substrate) induction with strong and moderate inducers using physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling.
The predictive performance of the PBPK model to simulate dolutegravir and raltegravir pharmacokinetics and to reproduce the strength of induction was verified using clinical drug-drug interaction studies (steady-state induction) and switch studies (residual induction). The model was considered verified when the predictions were within 2-fold of the observed data. One hundred virtual individuals (50% female) were generated to simulate the unstudied scenarios. The results were used to calculate the fold-change in CYP3A4 and UGT1A1 enzyme levels upon initiation and discontinuation of strong (rifampicin) or moderate (efavirenz or rifabutin) inducers.
The time for reaching maximal induction and subsequent disappearance of CYP3A4 induction was 14 days for rifampicin and efavirenz but 7 days for rifabutin. The distinct timelines for the moderate inducers relate to their different half-lives and plasma concentrations. The induction and de-induction processes were more rapid for UGT1A1.
Our simulations support the common practice of maintaining the adjusted dosage of a drug for another 2 weeks after stopping an inducer. Furthermore, our simulations suggest that an inducer should be administered for at least 14 days before conducting interaction studies to reach maximal induction.
感染 HIV 的人群可能会出现合并症,需要开始并随后停止具有诱导作用的药物治疗。达到最大酶诱导和恢复到基线酶水平的时间尚未得到充分描述。
本研究旨在使用基于生理学的药代动力学(PBPK)模型评估强诱导剂和中度诱导剂诱导多拉韦林[尿苷二磷酸葡萄糖醛酸转移酶(UGT)1A1 和细胞色素 P450(CYP)3A4 底物]和拉替拉韦(UGT1A1 底物)诱导的起始和消失。
使用临床药物相互作用研究(稳态诱导)和转换研究(残留诱导)验证 PBPK 模型模拟多拉韦林和拉替拉韦药代动力学和再现诱导强度的预测性能。当预测值在观察数据的 2 倍以内时,模型被认为是经过验证的。生成 100 个虚拟个体(50%为女性)以模拟未研究的情况。结果用于计算起始和停止使用强诱导剂(利福平)或中度诱导剂(依非韦伦或利福布汀)时 CYP3A4 和 UGT1A1 酶水平的变化倍数。
利福平诱导 CYP3A4 的最大诱导时间和随后的诱导消失时间为 14 天,依非韦伦为 14 天,但利福布汀为 7 天。中度诱导剂的不同时间线与它们不同的半衰期和血浆浓度有关。UGT1A1 的诱导和去诱导过程更快。
我们的模拟结果支持在停止诱导剂后再维持调整剂量的药物治疗 2 周的常用做法。此外,我们的模拟结果表明,在进行相互作用研究以达到最大诱导之前,应至少给予诱导剂 14 天。