Suppr超能文献

窄带成像技术在吞咽功能内镜评估中的应用——它是如何工作的?

Narrow Band Imaging in Flexible Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing-How Does It Work?

机构信息

Center for Clinical Neurosciences, Department of Voice, Speech and Hearing Disorders, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany.

出版信息

J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2023 Jun 20;66(6):2035-2046. doi: 10.1044/2023_JSLHR-22-00579. Epub 2023 Jun 6.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The purposes of this study were to compare the visibility of various color groups in different dilutions using narrow band imaging (NBI) and white light (WL) and to determine an optimal color combination using NBI and WL for multicolor flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES), for example, to test different consistencies.

METHOD

Preliminary examinations were performed in the oral cavity of two healthy volunteers. Various dyes were tested using NBI and WL to evaluate their visibilities. In the case of a clearly discernible color change, the visibility differences in the dilution series under WL and NBI were recorded and compared. Subsequently, an abbreviated dilution series with NBI and WL was performed in a volunteer as part of a swallow endoscopy to determine whether the results from the oral cavity could be transferred to the hypopharynx.

RESULTS

The enhancement of visibility using NBI compared with WL can be proven. When NBI was used, yellow and red food dyes and their mixtures showed distinct color changes. The reacting dyes were still visible under NBI, even at a 10-times-higher dilution, requiring a lower dye concentration for FEES. For increased visibility, the dyes used for FEES with NBI must contain colors from a small range in the yellow and red spectra, which are close to the filter maxima of NBI. Both colors are well visible under WL when combining red and green (secondary color of yellow).

CONCLUSIONS

Certain food colorings are visible 10 times more diluted under NBI than under WL. In a multicolored approach, optimal visibility under NBI and WL can be achieved by combining green and red. This new high-sensitivity FEES should be highlighted to allow an instant distinction from WL-FEES; we suggest "FEES+."

SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL

https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.23280290.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在通过窄带成像(NBI)和白光(WL)比较不同稀释度下不同颜色组的可见度,并确定使用 NBI 和 WL 进行多色灵活吞咽内镜评估(FEES)的最佳颜色组合,例如,测试不同的稠度。

方法

在两名健康志愿者的口腔中进行初步检查。使用 NBI 和 WL 测试各种染料,以评估它们的可见度。在颜色变化明显的情况下,记录并比较 WL 和 NBI 下稀释系列中的可见度差异。随后,在一名志愿者的吞咽内镜检查中进行了 NBI 和 WL 的简化稀释系列,以确定口腔中的结果是否可以转移到下咽。

结果

与 WL 相比,NBI 增强可见度的效果可以得到证明。当使用 NBI 时,黄色和红色食物染料及其混合物显示出明显的颜色变化。即使在 10 倍稀释的情况下,反应染料在 NBI 下仍可见,这需要 FEES 中较低的染料浓度。为了提高可见度,FEES 中使用的染料必须在 NBI 的黄色和红色光谱范围内包含颜色,这接近 NBI 的滤光片最大值。当将红色和绿色(黄色的二次色)组合使用时,这两种颜色在 WL 下都有很好的可见度。

结论

某些食用色素在 NBI 下的可见度比 WL 下高 10 倍。在多色方法中,通过组合绿色和红色,可以在 NBI 和 WL 下获得最佳可见度。这种新的高灵敏度 FEES 应该突出显示,以便与 WL-FEES 立即区分;我们建议使用“FEES+”。

补充材料

https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.23280290.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验