University Hospitals of Plymouth, Plymouth, Devon, UK.
Dis Esophagus. 2023 Nov 30;36(12). doi: 10.1093/dote/doad039.
The optimal management of cancer of the gastro-esophageal junction (GEJ) is an area of contention. GEJ tumors are typically resected via total gastrectomy or esophagectomy. Despite many studies aiming to determine the superiority of either procedure based on surgical or oncological outcomes, the evidence is equivocal. Data focusing specifically on quality of life (QoL), however, is limited. This systematic review was performed to determine if there is any difference in patient's QoL after total gastrectomy or esophagectomy. A systematic search of PubMed, Medline and Cochrane libraries was conducted for literature published between 1986 and 2023. Studies that used the internationally validated questionnaires EORTC QLQ-C30 and EORTC-QLQ-OG25, to compare QoL after esophagectomy to gastrectomy for the management of GEJ cancer were included. Five studies involving 575 patients undergoing either esophagectomy (n = 365) or total gastrectomy (n = 210) for GEJ tumors were included. QoL was predominantly assessed at 6, 12 and 24 months postoperatively. Although individual studies demonstrated significant differences in certain domains, these differences were not consistently demonstrated in more than one study. There is no evidence to suggest any significant differences in QoL after total gastrectomy compared to esophagectomy for management of gastro-esophageal junction cancer.
胃食管结合部(GEJ)癌症的最佳治疗方法存在争议。GEJ 肿瘤通常通过全胃切除术或食管切除术进行切除。尽管有许多研究旨在根据手术或肿瘤学结果确定哪种手术更具优势,但证据尚无定论。然而,专门关注生活质量(QoL)的数据有限。进行这项系统评价是为了确定在全胃切除术或食管切除术之后患者的 QoL 是否存在差异。对 1986 年至 2023 年期间发表的文献,在 PubMed、Medline 和 Cochrane 图书馆中进行了系统搜索。纳入了使用国际上经过验证的 EORTC QLQ-C30 和 EORTC-QLQ-OG25 问卷来比较食管切除术与胃切除术治疗 GEJ 癌症后 QoL 的研究。纳入了 5 项研究,涉及 575 例接受食管切除术(n=365)或全胃切除术(n=210)治疗 GEJ 肿瘤的患者。QoL 主要在术后 6、12 和 24 个月进行评估。尽管个别研究在某些领域显示出显著差异,但这些差异在超过一项研究中并未得到一致证明。没有证据表明全胃切除术与食管切除术治疗胃食管结合部癌症后 QoL 存在任何显著差异。