• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Using a Generalized Logistic Regression Method to Detect Differential Item Functioning With Multiple Groups in Cognitive Diagnostic Tests.使用广义逻辑回归方法检测认知诊断测试中多组的项目差异功能。
Appl Psychol Meas. 2023 Jun;47(4):328-346. doi: 10.1177/01466216231174559. Epub 2023 May 13.
2
Detecting Differential Item Functioning Using Multiple-Group Cognitive Diagnosis Models.使用多组认知诊断模型检测项目功能差异
Appl Psychol Meas. 2021 Jan;45(1):37-53. doi: 10.1177/0146621620965745. Epub 2020 Oct 21.
3
A Monte Carlo Study of an Iterative Wald Test Procedure for DIF Analysis.用于差异项目功能分析的迭代 Wald 检验程序的蒙特卡罗研究。
Educ Psychol Meas. 2017 Jan;77(1):104-118. doi: 10.1177/0013164416637104. Epub 2016 Mar 7.
4
A Comparison of Differential Item Functioning Detection Methods in Cognitive Diagnostic Models.认知诊断模型中差异项目功能检测方法的比较
Front Psychol. 2019 May 17;10:1137. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01137. eCollection 2019.
5
Detecting Differential Item Functioning Using the Logistic Regression Procedure in Small Samples.在小样本中使用逻辑回归程序检测项目功能差异
Appl Psychol Meas. 2017 Jan;41(1):30-43. doi: 10.1177/0146621616668015. Epub 2016 Sep 24.
6
Wald χ Test for Differential Item Functioning Detection with Polytomous Items in Multilevel Data.用于多水平数据中多分类项目差异项目功能检测的 Wald χ 检验
Educ Psychol Meas. 2024 Jun;84(3):530-548. doi: 10.1177/00131644231181688. Epub 2023 Jul 11.
7
A Log-Linear Modeling Approach for Differential Item Functioning Detection in Polytomously Scored Items.一种用于多分类计分项目中差异项目功能检测的对数线性建模方法。
Educ Psychol Meas. 2020 Feb;80(1):145-162. doi: 10.1177/0013164419853000. Epub 2019 Jun 10.
8
Modern psychometric methods for detection of differential item functioning: application to cognitive assessment measures.用于检测项目功能差异的现代心理测量方法:在认知评估测量中的应用。
Stat Med. 2000;19(11-12):1651-83. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(20000615/30)19:11/12<1651::aid-sim453>3.0.co;2-h.
9
Psychometric Properties and Performance of the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Depression Short Forms in Ethnically Diverse Groups.患者报告结局测量信息系统(PROMIS)抑郁简表在不同种族群体中的心理测量特性及表现
Psychol Test Assess Model. 2016;58(1):141-181.
10
Measurement Equivalence of the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Applied Cognition - General Concerns, Short Forms in Ethnically Diverse Groups.患者报告结局测量信息系统(PROMIS)应用认知量表在不同种族群体中的测量等效性——一般问题及简表
Psychol Test Assess Model. 2016;58(2):255-307.

使用广义逻辑回归方法检测认知诊断测试中多组的项目差异功能。

Using a Generalized Logistic Regression Method to Detect Differential Item Functioning With Multiple Groups in Cognitive Diagnostic Tests.

作者信息

Sun Xiaojian, Wang Shimeng, Guo Lei, Xin Tao, Song Naiqing

机构信息

School of Mathematics and Statistics, Southwest University, Chongqing, China.

Southwest University Branch, Collaborative Innovation Center of Assessment for Basic Education Quality, Chongqing, China.

出版信息

Appl Psychol Meas. 2023 Jun;47(4):328-346. doi: 10.1177/01466216231174559. Epub 2023 May 13.

DOI:10.1177/01466216231174559
PMID:37283590
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10240570/
Abstract

Items with the presence of differential item functioning (DIF) will compromise the validity and fairness of a test. Studies have investigated the DIF effect in the context of cognitive diagnostic assessment (CDA), and some DIF detection methods have been proposed. Most of these methods are mainly designed to perform the presence of DIF between two groups; however, empirical situations may contain more than two groups. To date, only a handful of studies have detected the DIF effect with multiple groups in the CDA context. This study uses the generalized logistic regression (GLR) method to detect DIF items by using the estimated attribute profile as matching criteria. A simulation study is conducted to examine the performance of the two GLR methods, GLR-based Wald test (GLR-Wald) and GLR-based likelihood ratio test (GLR-LRT), in detecting the DIF items, the results based on the ordinary Wald test are also reported. Results show that (1) both GLR-Wald and GLR-LRT have more reasonable performance in controlling Type I error rates than the ordinary Wald test in most conditions; (2) the GLR method also produces higher empirical rejection rates than the ordinary Wald test in most conditions; and (3) using the estimated attribute profile as the matching criteria can produce similar Type I error rates and empirical rejection rates for GLR-Wald and GLR-LRT. A real data example is also analyzed to illustrate the application of these DIF detection methods in multiple groups.

摘要

存在差异项目功能(DIF)的项目会损害测试的有效性和公平性。已有研究在认知诊断评估(CDA)背景下探究了DIF效应,并提出了一些DIF检测方法。这些方法大多主要用于检测两组之间是否存在DIF;然而,实际情况可能涉及不止两组。迄今为止,在CDA背景下,仅有少数研究检测了多组的DIF效应。本研究使用广义逻辑回归(GLR)方法,以估计的属性概况作为匹配标准来检测DIF项目。进行了一项模拟研究,以检验两种GLR方法,即基于GLR的Wald检验(GLR-Wald)和基于GLR的似然比检验(GLR-LRT)在检测DIF项目方面的性能,还报告了基于普通Wald检验的结果。结果表明:(1)在大多数情况下,GLR-Wald和GLR-LRT在控制I型错误率方面比普通Wald检验具有更合理的性能;(2)在大多数情况下,GLR方法的实际拒绝率也高于普通Wald检验;(3)以估计的属性概况作为匹配标准,GLR-Wald和GLR-LRT的I型错误率和实际拒绝率相似。还分析了一个实际数据示例,以说明这些DIF检测方法在多组中的应用。