• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Detecting Differential Item Functioning Using Multiple-Group Cognitive Diagnosis Models.使用多组认知诊断模型检测项目功能差异
Appl Psychol Meas. 2021 Jan;45(1):37-53. doi: 10.1177/0146621620965745. Epub 2020 Oct 21.
2
Using a Generalized Logistic Regression Method to Detect Differential Item Functioning With Multiple Groups in Cognitive Diagnostic Tests.使用广义逻辑回归方法检测认知诊断测试中多组的项目差异功能。
Appl Psychol Meas. 2023 Jun;47(4):328-346. doi: 10.1177/01466216231174559. Epub 2023 May 13.
3
A Monte Carlo Study of an Iterative Wald Test Procedure for DIF Analysis.用于差异项目功能分析的迭代 Wald 检验程序的蒙特卡罗研究。
Educ Psychol Meas. 2017 Jan;77(1):104-118. doi: 10.1177/0013164416637104. Epub 2016 Mar 7.
4
Wald χ Test for Differential Item Functioning Detection with Polytomous Items in Multilevel Data.用于多水平数据中多分类项目差异项目功能检测的 Wald χ 检验
Educ Psychol Meas. 2024 Jun;84(3):530-548. doi: 10.1177/00131644231181688. Epub 2023 Jul 11.
5
Anchor Selection Using the Wald Test Anchor-All-Test-All Procedure.使用Wald检验锚定-全检验-全程序进行锚定选择。
Appl Psychol Meas. 2017 Jan;41(1):17-29. doi: 10.1177/0146621616668014. Epub 2016 Sep 24.
6
DIF Statistical Inference Without Knowing Anchoring Items.不知晓锚定项目的 DIF 统计推断。
Psychometrika. 2023 Dec;88(4):1097-1122. doi: 10.1007/s11336-023-09930-9. Epub 2023 Aug 7.
7
A Comparison of Differential Item Functioning Detection Methods in Cognitive Diagnostic Models.认知诊断模型中差异项目功能检测方法的比较
Front Psychol. 2019 May 17;10:1137. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01137. eCollection 2019.
8
A Framework for Anchor Methods and an Iterative Forward Approach for DIF Detection.一种用于差异项目功能(DIF)检测的锚定方法框架及迭代向前法
Appl Psychol Meas. 2015 Mar;39(2):83-103. doi: 10.1177/0146621614544195. Epub 2014 Aug 25.
9
DIF Analysis with Unknown Groups and Anchor Items.不同组别和锚定项目的 DIF 分析。
Psychometrika. 2024 Mar;89(1):267-295. doi: 10.1007/s11336-024-09948-7. Epub 2024 Feb 21.
10
Evaluating measurement equivalence using the item response theory log-likelihood ratio (IRTLR) method to assess differential item functioning (DIF): applications (with illustrations) to measures of physical functioning ability and general distress.使用项目反应理论对数似然比(IRTLR)方法评估测量等价性,以评估项目功能差异(DIF):身体功能能力和一般痛苦测量的应用(附说明)
Qual Life Res. 2007;16 Suppl 1:43-68. doi: 10.1007/s11136-007-9186-4. Epub 2007 May 5.

引用本文的文献

1
A Generalized Multi-Detector Combination Approach for Differential Item Functioning Detection.一种用于差异项目功能检测的广义多探测器组合方法。
Appl Psychol Meas. 2024 Dec 19:01466216241310602. doi: 10.1177/01466216241310602.
2
Enhancing Precision in Predicting Magnitude of Differential Item Functioning: An M-DIF Pretrained Model Approach.提高预测项目功能差异程度的精度:一种M-DIF预训练模型方法。
Educ Psychol Meas. 2024 Oct 1:00131644241279882. doi: 10.1177/00131644241279882.
3
Development of The Chinese Version of Ultra-Low Vision Visual Functioning Questionnaire-150.超低视力视觉功能问卷-150 的中文版的研制。
Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2023 Jun 1;12(6):9. doi: 10.1167/tvst.12.6.9.
4
Don't worry about the anchor-item setting in longitudinal learning diagnostic assessments.不用担心纵向学习诊断评估中的锚定项目设置。
Front Psychol. 2023 Feb 9;14:1112463. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1112463. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Examining the Impact of Differential Item Functioning on Classification Accuracy in Cognitive Diagnostic Models.检验认知诊断模型中项目功能差异对分类准确性的影响。
Appl Psychol Meas. 2020 Jun;44(4):267-281. doi: 10.1177/0146621619858675. Epub 2019 Jul 4.
2
A Comparison of Differential Item Functioning Detection Methods in Cognitive Diagnostic Models.认知诊断模型中差异项目功能检测方法的比较
Front Psychol. 2019 May 17;10:1137. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01137. eCollection 2019.
3
An empirical Q-matrix validation method for the sequential generalized DINA model.序贯广义 DINA 模型的经验 Q 矩阵验证方法。
Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2020 Feb;73(1):142-163. doi: 10.1111/bmsp.12156. Epub 2019 Feb 5.
4
Model Similarity, Model Selection, and Attribute Classification.模型相似性、模型选择与属性分类。
Appl Psychol Meas. 2016 May;40(3):200-217. doi: 10.1177/0146621615621717. Epub 2016 Jan 18.
5
Modeling Omitted and Not-Reached Items in IRT Models.在项目反应理论(IRT)模型中对遗漏和未达项目进行建模
Psychometrika. 2016 Nov 15. doi: 10.1007/s11336-016-9544-7.
6
A Cautionary Note on Using G(2)(dif) to Assess Relative Model Fit in Categorical Data Analysis.关于在分类数据分析中使用G(2)(dif)评估相对模型拟合的警示说明。
Multivariate Behav Res. 2006 Mar 1;41(1):55-64. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr4101_4.
7
A general framework and an R package for the detection of dichotomous differential item functioning.一种用于检测二分类差异项目功能的通用框架和 R 包。
Behav Res Methods. 2010 Aug;42(3):847-62. doi: 10.3758/BRM.42.3.847.
8
Factor analysis of the Dutch-language version of the MCMI-III.明尼苏达多项人格问卷-III荷兰语版本的因素分析。
J Pers Assess. 2007 Apr;88(2):144-57. doi: 10.1080/00223890701267977.
9
Measurement of psychological disorders using cognitive diagnosis models.使用认知诊断模型测量心理障碍。
Psychol Methods. 2006 Sep;11(3):287-305. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.11.3.287.
10
Recommended effect size statistics for repeated measures designs.重复测量设计的推荐效应量统计量。
Behav Res Methods. 2005 Aug;37(3):379-84. doi: 10.3758/bf03192707.

使用多组认知诊断模型检测项目功能差异

Detecting Differential Item Functioning Using Multiple-Group Cognitive Diagnosis Models.

作者信息

Ma Wenchao, Terzi Ragip, de la Torre Jimmy

机构信息

The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, USA.

Harran University, Sanliurfa, Turkey.

出版信息

Appl Psychol Meas. 2021 Jan;45(1):37-53. doi: 10.1177/0146621620965745. Epub 2020 Oct 21.

DOI:10.1177/0146621620965745
PMID:33304020
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7711248/
Abstract

This study proposes a multiple-group cognitive diagnosis model to account for the fact that students in different groups may use distinct attributes or use the same attributes but in different manners (e.g., conjunctive, disjunctive, and compensatory) to solve problems. Based on the proposed model, this study systematically investigates the performance of the likelihood ratio (LR) test and Wald test in detecting differential item functioning (DIF). A forward anchor item search procedure was also proposed to identify a set of anchor items with invariant item parameters across groups. Results showed that the LR and Wald tests with the forward anchor item search algorithm produced better calibrated Type I error rates than the ordinary LR and Wald tests, especially when items were of low quality. A set of real data were also analyzed to illustrate the use of these DIF detection procedures.

摘要

本研究提出了一种多组认知诊断模型,以解释不同组的学生可能使用不同的属性,或者使用相同的属性但以不同方式(例如,合取、析取和补偿)解决问题这一事实。基于所提出的模型,本研究系统地考察了似然比(LR)检验和 Wald 检验在检测项目功能差异(DIF)方面的性能。还提出了一种前向锚定项目搜索程序,以识别一组在不同组间具有不变项目参数的锚定项目。结果表明,与普通的 LR 和 Wald 检验相比,采用前向锚定项目搜索算法的 LR 和 Wald 检验产生了校准效果更好的 I 类错误率,尤其是当项目质量较低时。还分析了一组实际数据,以说明这些 DIF 检测程序的使用情况。