• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

理解在整个国家医疗体系中将公平性纳入质量改进的背景。

Understanding the Context for Incorporating Equity into Quality Improvement Throughout a National Health Care System.

作者信息

Hausmann Leslie R M, Lamorte Carolyn, Estock Jamie L

机构信息

Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion (CHERP), Veterans Affairs (VA) Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.

Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.

出版信息

Health Equity. 2023 May 26;7(1):312-320. doi: 10.1089/heq.2023.0009. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.1089/heq.2023.0009
PMID:37284535
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10240324/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Although health care systems aspire to deliver equitable care, practical tools that empower the health care workforce to weave equity throughout quality improvement (QI) processes are lacking. In this article, we report findings from context of use interviews that informed the development of a user-centered tool to support equity-focused QI.

METHODS

Semistructured interviews were conducted from February to April of 2019. Participants included 14 medical center administrators, departmental or service line leaders, and clinical staff involved in direct patient care from three Veterans Affairs (VA) Medical Centers within a single region. Interviews covered existing practices for monitoring health care quality (i.e., priorities, tasks, workflow, and resources) and explored how equity data might fit into current processes. Themes extracted through rapid qualitative analysis were used to draft initial functional requirements for a tool to support equity-focused QI.

RESULTS

Although the potential value of examining disparities in health care quality was clearly recognized, the data necessary for examining disparities were lacking for most quality measures. Interviewees also desired guidance on how inequities could be addressed through QI. The ways in which QI initiatives were selected, carried out, and supported also had important design implications for tools to support equity-focused QI.

DISCUSSION

The themes identified in this work guided the development of a national VA Primary Care Equity Dashboard to support equity-focused QI within VA. Understanding the ways in which QI was carried out across multiple levels of the organization provided a successful foundation upon which to build functional tools to support thoughtful engagement around equity in clinical settings.

摘要

目的

尽管医疗保健系统致力于提供公平的医疗服务,但缺乏能让医疗保健人员在质量改进(QI)过程中融入公平理念的实用工具。在本文中,我们报告了使用情境访谈的结果,这些结果为开发以用户为中心的工具以支持聚焦公平的QI提供了依据。

方法

2019年2月至4月进行了半结构化访谈。参与者包括来自同一地区三个退伍军人事务(VA)医疗中心的14名医疗中心管理人员、部门或服务线负责人以及直接参与患者护理的临床工作人员。访谈涵盖了监测医疗质量的现有做法(即优先事项、任务、工作流程和资源),并探讨了公平数据如何融入当前流程。通过快速定性分析提取的主题被用于起草支持聚焦公平的QI工具的初始功能要求。

结果

尽管人们清楚地认识到检查医疗质量差异的潜在价值,但大多数质量指标缺乏检查差异所需的数据。受访者还希望得到关于如何通过QI解决不公平问题的指导。QI计划的选择、实施和支持方式对支持聚焦公平的QI工具也有重要的设计意义。

讨论

这项工作中确定的主题指导了国家VA初级保健公平仪表板的开发,以支持VA内部聚焦公平的QI。了解QI在组织多个层面的实施方式为构建功能性工具提供了成功的基础,以支持在临床环境中围绕公平进行深入参与。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa82/10240324/8e9e66ca73ca/heq.2023.0009_figure1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa82/10240324/8e9e66ca73ca/heq.2023.0009_figure1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa82/10240324/8e9e66ca73ca/heq.2023.0009_figure1.jpg

相似文献

1
Understanding the Context for Incorporating Equity into Quality Improvement Throughout a National Health Care System.理解在整个国家医疗体系中将公平性纳入质量改进的背景。
Health Equity. 2023 May 26;7(1):312-320. doi: 10.1089/heq.2023.0009. eCollection 2023.
2
Using rising tides to lift all boats: Equity-focused quality improvement as a tool to reduce neonatal health disparities.利用涨潮托起所有船只:以公平为重点的质量改进是减少新生儿健康差距的工具。
Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2021 Feb;26(1):101198. doi: 10.1016/j.siny.2021.101198. Epub 2021 Jan 22.
3
4
Do primary care quality improvement frameworks consider equity?初级保健质量改进框架是否考虑公平性?
BMJ Open Qual. 2024 Jul 24;13(3):e002839. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2024-002839.
5
Empowering Implementation Teams with a Learning Health System Approach: Leveraging Data to Improve Quality of Care for Transient Ischemic Attack.采用学习型健康系统方法增强实施团队能力:利用数据提高短暂性脑缺血发作的护理质量。
J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Nov;35(Suppl 2):823-831. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-06160-y. Epub 2020 Sep 1.
6
Closing the gap on healthcare quality for equity-deserving groups: a scoping review of equity-focused quality improvement interventions in medicine.缩小应得公平医疗群体的医疗质量差距:对医学领域以公平为重点的质量改进干预措施的范围审查
BMJ Qual Saf. 2025 Jan 28;34(2):120-129. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2023-017022.
7
All Quality Improvement Is Health Equity Work: Designing Improvement to Reduce Disparities.所有质量改进都是健康公平工作:设计改进措施以减少差距。
Pediatrics. 2022 Mar 1;149(Suppl 3). doi: 10.1542/peds.2020-045948E.
8
Study protocol: improving the transition of care from a non-network hospital back to the patient's medical home.研究方案:改善从非网络医院转回患者医疗之家的护理过渡。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Feb 10;17(1):123. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2048-z.
9
Developing an informatics tool to advance supportive care: the Veterans Health Care Administration Palliative Care National Clinical Template.开发一种推进支持性护理的信息学工具:退伍军人医疗管理局姑息治疗国家临床模板。
J Palliat Med. 2014 Mar;17(3):266-73. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2013.0288. Epub 2014 Feb 18.
10

引用本文的文献

1
Trends in Initial Antihypertensive Medication Prescribing Among >2.8 Million Veterans Newly Diagnosed With Hypertension, 2000 to 2019.2000 年至 2019 年间,超过 280 万新诊断为高血压的退伍军人的初始抗高血压药物处方趋势。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 Oct 15;13(20):e036557. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.124.036557. Epub 2024 Oct 11.
2
Community design of the Brooklyn Health Equity Index.布鲁克林健康公平指数的社区设计
Health Aff Sch. 2024 Sep 9;2(9):qxae112. doi: 10.1093/haschl/qxae112. eCollection 2024 Sep.
3
Perceptions, Attitudes, and Barriers towards the Use of Central Board for Accreditation of Healthcare Institutions (CBAHI) Standards among Saudi Healthcare Providers.

本文引用的文献

1
Accelerating Generation and Impacts of Research Evidence to Improve Women Veterans' Health and Health Care.加速研究证据的产生及其影响,以改善女性退伍军人的健康状况和医疗保健服务。
J Gen Intern Med. 2022 Sep;37(Suppl 3):668-670. doi: 10.1007/s11606-022-07607-0.
2
Structural Racism In Historical And Modern US Health Care Policy.美国历史和现代医疗保健政策中的结构性种族主义。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2022 Feb;41(2):187-194. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2021.01466.
3
Systemic And Structural Racism: Definitions, Examples, Health Damages, And Approaches To Dismantling.
沙特医疗服务提供者对使用医疗机构认证中央委员会(CBAHI)标准的认知、态度和障碍
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Jan 12;12(2):183. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12020183.
系统性和结构性种族主义:定义、示例、健康损害以及消除方法。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2022 Feb;41(2):171-178. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2021.01394.
4
Spreading pride in all who served: A health education program to improve access and mental health outcomes for sexual and gender minority veterans.传播为所有服务者感到自豪的精神:一个改善性和性别少数群体退伍军人获得服务和心理健康结果的健康教育项目。
Psychol Serv. 2023 Aug;20(3):596-608. doi: 10.1037/ser0000604. Epub 2022 Feb 3.
5
Bridging the Patient Engagement Gap in Research and Quality Improvement Utilizing the Henry Ford Flexible Engagement Model.利用亨利·福特灵活参与模式弥合研究与质量改进中的患者参与差距。
J Patient Cent Res Rev. 2022 Jan 17;9(1):35-45. doi: 10.17294/2330-0698.1828. eCollection 2022 Winter.
6
The Quintuple Aim for Health Care Improvement: A New Imperative to Advance Health Equity.医疗保健改善的五大目标:促进健康公平的新要务。
JAMA. 2022 Feb 8;327(6):521-522. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.25181.
7
Equity and Quality-Improving Health Care Delivery Requires Both.公平与质量——改善医疗服务两者缺一不可。
JAMA. 2022 Feb 8;327(6):519-520. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.0283.
8
Developing an electronic health record-derived health equity dashboard to improve learner access to data and metrics.开发一个源自电子健康记录的健康公平仪表板,以改善学习者对数据和指标的获取。
AEM Educ Train. 2021 Sep 29;5(Suppl 1):S116-S120. doi: 10.1002/aet2.10682. eCollection 2021 Sep.
9
From HRO to HERO: Making Health Equity a Core System Capability.从高可靠性组织到健康公平性倡导者:将健康公平性打造为核心系统能力。
Am J Med Qual. 2022;37(1):81-83. doi: 10.1097/JMQ.0000000000000020.
10
Evaluation of a collaborative VA network initiative to reduce racial disparities in blood pressure control among veterans with severe hypertension.评估一个合作 VA 网络计划,以减少严重高血压退伍军人中血压控制方面的种族差异。
Healthc (Amst). 2021 Jun;8 Suppl 1:100485. doi: 10.1016/j.hjdsi.2020.100485. Epub 2021 Jun 23.